The Chinese State in Ming Society is a history book which investigates the role of the state in China in the Ming dynasty (from 1368 to 1644 in the late Imperial Chinese era); the interface between the state and society, and the effect of the state on ordinary people.[1][2]
Author | Timothy Brook |
---|---|
Language | English |
Genre | History |
Publisher | Routledge (Critical Asian Scholarship series) |
Publication date | 17 December 2004 |
Publication place | London, United Kingdom |
Media type | Print (Hardback) |
Pages | 272 |
ISBN | 0-415-34506-5 |
The book is written by Timothy Brook, a distinguished[3] Canadian historian who specializes in the study of China (Sinology).[4]
Synopsis
editThe Chinese State in Ming Society is set in the Ming dynasty, an era in which there was much "commercial expansion and cultural innovation".[2] The book is an "account of events and issues that engaged the members of local elites in Ming society and of the interface between these elites and the state,"[1] and the impact of the state on ordinary people in areas such as education, justice, the military and taxation.[1]
The book consists of a reworking of eight "heavily illustrated" essays which Brook has written and published separately over the years, and is divided into four main sections (parts I to IV) with two of these essays to each part of the book.[1][2] The parts are named "Space", "Fields", "Books" and "Monasteries", each of which "represent important areas of intersection between the Ming state and society."[1][2]
Brook argues that the model of despotic government fails to account for the complex interactions between individuals, groups, communities, society and state in this period.[1] Instead he proposes that by 1500 the Chinese had a remarkably developed system of governance, surpassing that of the European monarchs of the time, and that the developments were not the result of the isolated actions of the state, but rather of a complex interface and interaction, including local representatives of the state such as magistrates and local networks of the elite class of gentry.[1] According to Ellen Soulliere in her review, Brook argues that "society had the [enduring] ability to constrain, limit and sometimes redirect the authority of the state, without challenging its most basic claim to be the source of all legitimate authority."[1]
Reception
editThis section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (January 2010) |
Writing in the New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies, Ellen Soulliere describes the book as a "detailed", "succinct" and "compelling" account.[1] In conclusion, she states that "All in all, this is a fascinating and very valuable book that addresses major themes in Chinese history while greatly expanding our detailed knowledge of the issues that engaged people at the level of their local communities. It illuminates the conflicts and controversies that kept the state and society in a state of dynamic tension throughout the Ming period and beyond."[1]
Notes
edit- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Soulliere, Ellen (June 2006). "Timothy Brook, The Chinese State in Ming Society" (PDF). New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies. 8 (1). New Zealand Asian Studies Society: 168–171. Retrieved 2010-01-28.
- ^ a b c d Staff (2004). The Chinese State in Ming Society: About the Book. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-34507-1. Retrieved 2010-01-29.
- ^ Dirda, Michael (27 January 2008). "Painting the World: How a hunger for tea and tobacco created global trade". Washington Post. Retrieved 2010-01-22.
- ^ Conrad, Peter (29 June 2008). "A time when every picture told a story". The Observer. Retrieved 2010-01-22.
References
edit- Nakajima, Gakusho (January 2006). "The Chinese State in Ming Society by Timothy Brook". International Journal of Asian Studies. 3 (1). Association for Asian Studies: 143–147. doi:10.1017/S1479591405280257. S2CID 144121735. Retrieved 2010-01-26.
- Soulliere, Ellen (June 2006). "Timothy Brook, The Chinese State in Ming Society" (PDF). New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies. 8 (1). New Zealand Asian Studies Society: 168–171. Retrieved 2010-01-28.