This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
The John H. Jackson Moot Court Competition.[1] is an international moot court competition on WTO law.[2][3][4] The competition takes place on a yearly basis, with its first edition dating back to 2002. The competition was formerly known as ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO but has been renamed in 2018 after the American professor of law John Howard Jackson.
The competition is structured into six regional rounds all over the world and a final oral round where around 25 selected teams take part in. Each edition of the moot court hosts around one hundred teams constituted of two to four law students.
The Competition simulates a hearing of the WTO dispute settlement system. Teams prepare and analyse a fictitious case created by specialists of WTO Law and present their arguments for both the Complainant and the Respondent, first in a written format and then in front of a Panel which consists of WTO and trade law experts.
The competition is organised by the European Law Students' Association (ELSA) and is technically supported by the World Trade Organization.[5][6] It gathers participants from around 40 countries and 80 universities every year. The 18th and the 19th editions of the Competition where mainly organised online.
Since 2020, Pascal Lamy, former Director General of the WTO, is the Patron of the Competition.
The competition
editOrganisers
editThe Competition is organized by the international board of the European Law Students’ Association (ELSA). The European Law Students’ Association (ELSA) is an international, independent, non-political, non-profit making organisation for students and recent graduates in the field of Law. ELSA organises international project, amongst which the John H. Jackson Moot Court Competition.
The administrative planning of the Competition, the coordination of the Regional Rounds, and the organisation of the Final Oral Round is carried out by ELSA and the regional rounds of the competition are organized by selected hosts (universities, entities, firms)[7]
Sponsors and supporters
edit
The John H. Jackson Moot Court Competition is supported by multiple historical sponsors, in addition to the technical support of the World Trade Organization. They are providing financial and academic support to the organisation.
Van Bael & Bellis is the main sponsor of the John H. Jackson Moot Court Competition. Baker McKenzie, Akin Gump and Steptoe are the gold sponsors of the Competition and Sidley Austin and White and Case are the silver sponsors of the Competition.
Georgetown Law is the main academic supporter of the John H. Jackson Moot Court Competition and the World Trade Institute (WTI) and the European Public Law Organization (EPLO) are the academic supporters of the Competition
Awards
editDuring the Regional Rounds as well as during the Final Oral Round of the Competition, some teams and some participants are Awarded. The sponsors and supporters of the Competition are providing prizes for some of the Awards during the Competition.
The awards are:
- Best Complainant Written Submission Awards, for the Complainant, the Respondent and Overall;
- Best Orator Awards, for the Preliminaries, the Quarter-Finals, the Semi-Finals and the Final;
- Runner up of the round;
- Winner of the round.
Structure of the competition
edit1. The Written Round
editOn the 15th of September, the new edition is launched and the Case if published. The teams taking part in the competition have then between four and five months to draft two written submissions of 35 pages maximum each, one for each side of the dispute (Complainant and Respondent).
This round is not eliminatory, and all the teams submitting the written submissions will take part in the Regional Rounds. There the scores of the written submissions will be added to the scores they will receive in their pleading.
2. The Regional Rounds
editAll the teams that submitted a Written Submission will proceed to one of the 6 Regional Oral Rounds, depending on their location, from February to May of the second semester of the Edition. They will then plead against each other in sessions of 2 hours 30, at least two times.
Six rounds, as follow, are taking place in a new location every ear, hosted by Institution, chapters of ELSA or ALSA[8] or Universities:
- First and Second European Regional Rounds (including all the countries where an ELSA group is present);
- East Asia & Oceania Regional Round;
- West & South Asia Regional Round;
- All American Regional Round;
- African Regional Round.
They will first plead for the Complainant and the Respondent side in the preliminary sessions, then the four selected teams will plead during the Semi-Finals of the regional round and the winning teams of the Semi-Finals are taking part in the Final of the Round, open to public.
3. Final Oral Round
editThe 25 selected teams of the Regional Rounds gather in Geneva, at the WTO Headquarters and at the Graduate Institute,[9] where the Final Oral Round of the competition takes place at the end of June.
The Final Oral Round is structured in the same way as the regional rounds.
Winners of the previous editions
edit| Edition | Year | Winning Team |
|---|---|---|
| 20th | 2021-22 | University of Zurich, Switzerland[11] |
| 19th | 2020-21 | University of Colombo, Sri Lanka[12] |
| 18th | 2019-20 | Government Law College, Mumbai, India[13][14] |
| 17th | 2018-19 | Strathmore University, Kenya |
| 16th | 2017-18 | Graduate Institute for International Studies, Switzerland |
| 15th | 2016-17 | Harvard Law School, USA[15] |
| 14th | 2015-16 | Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Colombia |
| 13th | 2014-15 | National University of Juridical Sciences, India |
| 12th | 2013-14 | University of Athens, Greece |
| 11th | 2012-13 | Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Colombia |
| 10th | 2011-12 | Graduate Institute for International Studies, Switzerland |
| 9th | 2010-11 | University of Melbourne, Australia |
| 8th | 2009-10 | National University of Juridical Sciences, India |
| 7th | 2008-09 | University of Melbourne, Australia |
| 6th | 2007-08 | University of Los Andes, Colombia |
| 5th | 2006-07 | University of Melbourne, Australia |
| 4th | 2005-06 | University of Sydney, Australia |
| 3rd | 2004-05 | City University London, United Kingdom |
| 2nd | 2003-04 | London School of Economics, United Kingdom |
| 1st | 2002-03 | University College London, United Kingdom |
Cases of the previous editions
edit| Edition | Case | Case Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 19th | Budica - Measures relating to the importation and marketing of nutrition food bars | Gustavo Guarín-Duque;
Julián Becerra-Sánchez; Sara Lucía Dangón-Novoa |
| 18th | Taikon– Requirements on the Importation of Prepared Foods and Live Animals from Astor | Geraldo Vidigal |
| 17th | Zycron – Certain Measures Related to Electric Vehicles Charging Points and Infrastructure | Maria Anna Corvaglia;
Rodrigo Polanco Lazo |
| 16th | Borginia– Measures Affecting Trade in Textile Products | Prof. James J. Nedumpara |
| 15th | The CHIMEHA FTA between Chilo, Meco and Haito | Dr. Gabrielle Marceau |
| 14th | Eriador – Measures affecting the electricity sector | Andrew Lang |
| 13th | Viridium – Measures Affecting the Agricultural Sector | Nicolas Lamp |
| 12th | Aquitania – Measures Affecting Water Distribution and Sewage Collection Services | Markus Krajewski |
| 11th | Fixitania – Certain Measures affecting Financial Services and Influencing the Exchange-rate | Prof. Dr. Christoph Herrmann |
| 10th | ||
| 9th | Russelia – Measures Affecting the Importation of Sheep and Sheep Products from Aldousia | Dr Tomer Broude;
Dr Lukasz Gruszczynski |
| 8th | Ipland Certain Measures Affecting the Protection and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights | Prof. Bryan Mercurio |
| 7th | Ecoland – Measures Relating to Biofuels Made from Pine Cones | Prof. Bradly Condon |
| 6th | Teleland – Measures Affecting Telecommunications Services | Prof. Shin-yi Peng |
| 5th | Factoril – Compulsory Licensing of Pharmaceutical Patent | Dr Tania Voon |
| 4th | Subsidia – Agricultural Subsidies on Sweet Biscuits, Wheat & Pork | Prof. Jacques Bourgeois;
Prof. David A. Gantz; Dr. Laura Nielsen |
| 3rd | Dispute concerning Paradise – Differential Tariff Restrictions on Food Imports from Developing Countries | Prof. Robert Howse |
| 2nd | Dispute Concerning Mullavia - Measures Undertaken for the Establishment of the CUMCURIA Arrangement | Dr James Mathis |
| 1st | Bohemian Union – Import Restrictions on Tuna from the Empire of Avalon. |
References
edit- ^ "johnhjacksonmoot". Retrieved 2021-04-14.
- ^ "John H. Jackson Moot Court Competition". www.law.georgetown.edu. Retrieved 2021-05-05.
- ^ "ELSA MOOT COURT COMPETITION, WTO Dispute Settlement System". Advocacy. Retrieved 2021-05-05.
- ^ "WTO Moot Court 2016/2017". www.ivr.uzh.ch (in German). Retrieved 2021-05-05.
- ^ "WTO - Elsa Moot Court". www.wto.org. Retrieved 2021-05-05.
- ^ General Session on participating in the John H. Jackson Moot Court on WTO Law, retrieved 2021-05-24
- ^ "Moot Court". American University Washington College of Law. Retrieved 2021-05-05.
- ^ "Asian Law Students' Association | Always be One!". Retrieved 2021-04-14.
- ^ "WTO Moot Court Competition | IHEID". www.graduateinstitute.ch. Retrieved 2021-05-05.
- ^ "johnhjacksonmoot | Former Editions". Retrieved 2021-04-14.
- ^ "WTO Hosts 20th Edition of John H. Jackson Moot Court Competition". www.wto.org. Retrieved 2022-08-06.
- ^ "WTO announces winners of John H. Jackson Moot Court Competition". www.wto.org. Retrieved 2022-08-06.
- ^ "WTO awards winners of John H. Jackson Moot Court competition's final round". www.wto.org. Retrieved 2021-04-14.
- ^ "WTO awards winners of John H. Jackson Moot Court competition's final round". Global NGO Impact News. 2020-06-30. Retrieved 2021-04-19.
- ^ "WTO". Harvard Law School Moot Court. 2012-11-14. Retrieved 2021-05-05.