The Myth of the Andalusian Paradise

The Myth of the Andalusian Paradise is a non-fiction book written by Dario Fernández-Morera and published by ICI Books in 2016. In it, the author argues against La Convivencia, the hypothesis that the Spanish Islamic realms (Al-Andalus) were religiously tolerant.

The Myth of the Andalusian Paradise: Muslims, Christians, and Jews under Islamic rule in medieval Spain
First edition
AuthorDario Fernández-Morera
LanguageEnglish
SubjectLa Convivencia
GenreIslamic history
PublisherIntercollegiate Studies Institute
Publication date
February 29, 2016
Media typePrint (Hardcover, Paperback), E-book
Pages358
ISBN978-1610170956
OCLC1014253105

Background and contents

edit

Fernández-Morera is a Cuban-born associate professor at Northwestern University in the United States, specialising in the literature of Miguel Cervantes.[1] ICI Books is the publishing arm of the Intercollegiate Studies Institute, an American conservative think tank.[2]

The author believes that left-wing academics, journalists and politicians misrepresent the tolerance in Al-Andalus to promote their own agendas in modern times.[3] He argues that the Umayyad conquest of Hispania destroyed Visigothic Spain when it was flourishing culturally.[4] He mentions the important role of slavery in the economy of Al-Andalus, as well as the jizya tax taken from Christians and Jews as part of their dhimmi minority status that was higher than the equivalent zakat tax for Muslims.[4] He details the persecution of religious minorities under the later Almohad and Almoravid dynasties (Almohad doctrine), such as the Almohad emir Abu Yusuf who is said to have boasted that he had destroyed every church and synagogue in his realm.[4]

Reception

edit

Trevor J. Dadson called the book "a definite must-read for anyone interested in medieval Spain".[5] Alberto Ferreiro also gave the work a positive review, expressing a desire for a Spanish translation.[6]

Maribel Fierro finds that Fernández-Morera often "lacks first-hand knowledge of his subject matter and has misinterpreted his readings" and his book "will not lead to a better understanding of al-Andalus" but is "useful in understanding how al-Andalus is employed to fight the battles of the present".[7]

David F. Forte, a professor of law at Cleveland State University, wrote that the level of research for the book was "prodigious", but its organisation was poor and it "veers between genuine scholarship, pedantry, and advocacy". He noted some double standards in Fernández-Morera's argument: the Visigoths were praised for borrowing from their Roman predecessors, while the Muslims are chastised for doing the same; the book similarly mentions the Muslims' roles in the slave trade in Iberia and Africa, but not how the Christian Spaniards were involved in the same practices. Forte writes that the best research in the book is on how Iberian Christians and Jews dealt with internal rifts in the same era; the Jews against the Karaite sect and the Christians against Arianism.[4]

S. J. Pearce, an associate professor of Spanish and Portuguese at New York University and specialist on medieval Spain, wrote a scathing review of the book. She wrote that "the historian behind The Myth is promoting propaganda traditionally associated with the Spanish far-right", and "The Myth's myth is a myth", accusing Fernández-Morera of constructing a straw man argument of medieval Islamic tolerance that is not the modern academic consensus, as well as "It would be a book-length corrective that would address and properly contextualize and source all of the errors that occur at every level in The Myth".[1] She repeated her criticism in a 44-page chapter in The Extreme Right and the Revision of History.[8]

References

edit

General

Specific

  1. ^ a b Pearce, S. J. (17 March 2017). "Paradise Lost". Retrieved 4 September 2020.
  2. ^ Pearce 2020, p. 9
  3. ^ Pearce 2020, p. 2
  4. ^ a b c d Forte, David F. (3 August 2016). "Paradise Lost?". Law & Liberty. Retrieved 4 September 2020.
  5. ^ Review in The Modern Language Review 113.2 (2018): 421–423. doi:10.5699/modelangrevi.113.2.0421
  6. ^ Review in Anuario de Historia de la Iglesia 26 (2017): 574–576.
  7. ^ Review in al-Qantara 39.1 (2018): 248–253.
  8. ^ Pearce 2020, pp. 5–6
edit