Article evaluation #1
Spider man [1]
On this article about Spider man was very informative and very detailed in the first few paragraphs but once you got to the more detailed facts it lost a lot of references. Like when it talks about his super powers and costume it didn't reference what villeins countered certain ability's also how in certain comics he had different powers. In the section about personality its very short and does not get the point across. He has a very different personality and all it talks about is what his personality means to people instead of talking about his personality. Why it had a section about real life spider man I don't know they don't effect the characters they are just fan boys no the real hero felt like that needed to be a separate article names real life spider men that threw me off a lot. I felt a very strong presence of mostly the creators and the success of spider man more than like who is spider man? I felt if i didn't know anything about him and read that article it would just tell me what he does in the comic books and who created him. When what i wanted to know is years of comic book info but you get none of that. I got about half way through the articles lines i couldn't find any plagiarize or wrong links felt like to many links for my taste on pointless things but none where wrong. None of the content is out of date or behind this article is kept very uptight as you can see it is under semi protection. So in the talk section nothing is going on because its on protection its just people adding and editing the article. I would give this article a big 5,000 out of 6,000 empty web shooters. Because although it gives facts just does not give you the knowledge that you would if you read the comics or just ask a friend who has.
Article Evaluation #2
Call of Duty [2]
The article was very small and not very informative knowing a lot of info its missing a lot of important info about the competitive side. The article was very out of date missing merchandiser there are new POP figures not in their also mega blocks not in the section. Also fails to mention the updated followers on twitter and in the grammar section says came out not will come out. All around a very poorly done article and for being in the top 5 competitive games world wide needs a update looks pathetic. 5 out of 50 prestige's
Two pieces of research Funko pops, and release dates if the pops.
 | This is a user sandbox of 50StarfishFifty. You can use it for testing or practicing edits. This is not the sandbox where you should draft your assigned article for a dashboard.wikiedu.org course. To find the right sandbox for your assignment, visit your Dashboard course page and follow the Sandbox Draft link for your assigned article in the My Articles section. |
- ^ "Spider-Man". Wikipedia. 2017-04-24.
- ^ "Call of Duty". Wikipedia. 2017-04-24.