00:00 16-05-09 [1] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision 1600 admins: my condolences, but high motivation from fringe editors is partly due to unfair treatment.
23:33 15-05-09 [2] Talk:List of common misconceptions Water Hose Misconception: Really bad explanation in Physics section. Absurd "misconception": more. suspect complex mathematical explanations of simple phenomena.
22:27 15-05-09 [3] User talk:Rracecarr Friction with water?: new section) (top) [rollback]
21:51 15-05-09 [4] User talk:Mistro12 Sockpuppetry case: fmt
21:45 15-05-09 [5] User talk:Mistro12 Sockpuppetry case: okay, taking this at face value.
21:31 15-05-09 [6] Talk:University of Atlanta Deletion: it's a balance.
20:23 15-05-09 [7] User talk:Literaturegeek primary sources: in the end, it's all up to editorial consensus.
19:56 15-05-09 [8] Talk:List of common misconceptions Water Hose Misconception: Really bad explanation in Physics section. Absurd "misconception": Oh, goody! If I'm wrong I get to learn something. Being right is boring.
19:29 15-05-09 [9] User talk:Abd AfD nomination of University of Atlanta: thanks, A.B.
19:22 15-05-09 [10] User talk:Abd Laughlin Award & Academy of American Poets
19:21 15-05-09 [11] User talk:Abd Laughlin Award & Academy of American Poets: thanks.
19:11 15-05-09 [12] User talk:Mistro12 Sockpuppetry case: fmt
19:11 15-05-09 [13] User talk:Mistro12 Sockpuppetry case: disclose all, the fastest way to resolve this with a positive result.
18:16 15-05-09 [14] Talk:University of Atlanta advice for A. Mithani.
17:10 15-05-09 [15] John Bockris If we are going to give only a decade, this is more accurate. He didn't start until mid-1989, no earlier.) (top) [rollback]
17:08 15-05-09 [16] Talk:Cold fusion Vysotskii and biological transmutation: respond to Enric.
16:55 15-05-09 [17] Talk:Cold fusion Undue Weight: Hipocrite POV not consensus, no consensus yet found on these questions.
16:34 15-05-09 [18] Talk:Cold fusion Reliability of sources: this header level screwed up the TOC.
16:30 15-05-09 [19] Talk:Cold fusion how did this section end up in the middle of the Reliable Sources discussion? Give section title some more meat.
16:27 15-05-09 [20] Talk:Cold fusion Some News: a collapse title should be reasonably neutral and descriptive.
16:14 15-05-09 [21] Talk:List of common misconceptions Water Hose Misconception: Really bad explanation in Physics section. Absurd "misconception": viscosity of water is negligible. Hydraulic pressure has been overlooked.
15:10 15-05-09 [22] List of winners of the James Laughlin Award Winners: cite 2008 book publisher page
14:56 15-05-09 [23] List of winners of the James Laughlin Award Winners: independent reference Rusty Morrison, 2008.
14:49 15-05-09 [24] List of winners of the James Laughlin Award Winners: citation for Sharon Olds, 1983
14:44 15-05-09 [25] Talk:List of winners of the James Laughlin Award List of Awardees: hmmph!
14:35 15-05-09 [26] User talk:Abd Laughlin Award & Academy of American Poets: Laughlin award succeeded the Lamont Poetry Prize, first given in 1954.
14:21 15-05-09 [27] User talk:Abd Laughlin Award & Academy of American Poets: Thanks.
13:30 15-05-09 [28] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision Abd's pursuit of dispute resolution: qualify
13:30 15-05-09 [29] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision Abd's pursuit of dispute resolution: Okay, I'll try.
13:25 15-05-09 [30] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision Findings and remedies about Abd: agree with Carcharoth
04:39 15-05-09 [31] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision Abd's pursuit of dispute resolution: new section
03:58 15-05-09 [32] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Proposed topic ban of user:Scuro from Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: reply to Durova.
03:04 15-05-09 [33] Talk:List of common misconceptions Water Hose Misconception: Really bad explanation in Physics section. Absurd "misconception": original research....
02:24 15-05-09 [34] User talk:Beetstra Lostthegame whitelisting: Okay.
02:09 15-05-09 [35] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision Multiple, unsynchronized definitions of "uninvolved": comment.
02:02 15-05-09 [36] User talk:Abd Hi: welcome, have some tea.
01:33 15-05-09 [37] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision 1600 admins: IAR should never be a block rationale; it is, rather, a possible defense against blocking while involved, if recusal disclosing involvement is immediate.
15:09 14-05-09 [38] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Topic ban user:Scuro: Nja247 should not be the one to close this, nor the one to ban and maintain the ban.
14:46 14-05-09 [39] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Topic ban user:Scuro: support.
14:24 14-05-09 [40] User talk:Beetstra Lostthegame whitelisting: you anticipated the trusted users concept. Wow! Even better work!
14:16 14-05-09 [41] User talk:Beetstra Lostthegame whitelisting: great job, Beetstra, looks very good.
13:37 14-05-09 [42] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist pokerverdict.com: I got confused. It wasn't JzG. I thought Stifle at first, then looked up and saw JzG. What's wrong with this coffee?
13:34 14-05-09 [43] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist pokerverdict.com: you can ask the admin to reconsider. But, other admins: it might save JzG some trouble if you delist without that. Either way is fine.
04:33 14-05-09 [44] Talk:List of common misconceptions Water Hose Misconception: Really bad explanation in Physics section. Absurd "misconception": my, my, touchy.
00:02 14-05-09 [45] Talk:List of common misconceptions Water Hose Misconception: Really bad explanation in Physics section. Absurd "misconception": explain again.
23:28 13-05-09 [46] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision 1600 admins: if you notify properly, "review" might mean that nobody does anything, which effectively affirms the action without prejudice.
20:49 13-05-09 [47] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision 1600 admins: how to deal with too few admins, short-term.
20:38 13-05-09 [48] Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Poetry Notability of Academy of American Poets?: this is useful content. I'm prepared to defend it.
20:32 13-05-09 [49] List of winners of the James Laughlin Award Winners: List of judges
20:06 13-05-09 [50] Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Poetry Notability of Academy of American Poets?: list of public information not copyrightable
19:54 13-05-09 [51] Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Poetry Notability of Academy of American Poets?: update. copyright?
19:44 13-05-09 [52] Academy of American Poets okay, remove some arguable OR, leave less.
17:22 13-05-09 [53] Talk:Academy of American Poets Disputed??: removed the notability tag only.
17:18 13-05-09 [54] Academy of American Poets remove notability tag alone, not specifically justified. Other tag may be okay.
17:16 13-05-09 [55] Talk:Academy of American Poets Disputed??: that's right. none of us are required to do anything here.
17:09 13-05-09 [56] Talk:List of winners of the James Laughlin Award List of Awardees: showing judges is harmless, but I also don't consider it truly necessary. For now, I respect the work done to put it there.
17:07 13-05-09 [57] List of winners of the James Laughlin Award remove all but lead paragraph.
17:05 13-05-09 [58] Academy of American Poets James Laughlin Award: from main article to here, merge content.
17:03 13-05-09 [59] Academy of American Poets James Laughlin Award: add link to list.
17:00 13-05-09 [60] List of winners of the James Laughlin Award remove notability tag, there is sufficient source, but as a List article, this is supporting and is supported by the main article on the organization giving it.
16:58 13-05-09 [61] List of winners of the James Laughlin Award moved Talk:James Laughlin Award to Talk:List of winners of the James Laughlin Award: make into list article to support article on organization.) (top
16:58 13-05-09 [62] Talk:List of winners of the James Laughlin Award moved Talk:James Laughlin Award to Talk:List of winners of the James Laughlin Award: make into list article to support article on organization.
16:58 13-05-09 [63] James Laughlin Award moved James Laughlin Award to List of winners of the James Laughlin Award: make into list article to support article on organization.) (top
16:58 13-05-09 [64] Talk:James Laughlin Award moved James Laughlin Award to List of winners of the James Laughlin Award: make into list article to support article on organization.
16:57 13-05-09 [65] List of winners of the James Laughlin Award moving to list article, removed some possibly unnecessary stuff, but then left some too. This *might* justify an article other than a mere List. This will be followed by a move.
16:48 13-05-09 [66] List of winners of the James Laughlin Award prepare to convert to List article.
16:46 13-05-09 [67] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision 1600 admins: sp
16:46 13-05-09 [68] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision 1600 admins: sure, the active number is much less, though that doesn't affect the cogency of the argument that there are many.
16:39 13-05-09 [69] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision The view from the cheap seats: ass = grass if I abuse this.
16:22 13-05-09 [70] Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Poetry Notability of Academy of American Poets?: a bit of ping-pong at the article, the attention of other editors would be useful.
16:18 13-05-09 [71] Academy of American Poets Undid revision 289688195 by Collectonian (talk)Please, if a tag is proper, replace it with discussion in Talk of THAT tag.
16:16 13-05-09 [72] Talk:Academy of American Poets Disputed??: no specificity to complaints.
16:07 13-05-09 [73] Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Poetry Notability of Academy of American Poets?: okay, removed tags and I suggest solution to lists of winners of awards
16:01 13-05-09 [74] Academy of American Poets remove tags inadequately supported.
16:00 13-05-09 [75] Talk:Academy of American Poets Disputed??: removing the tag and why.
14:50 13-05-09 [76] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision Good advice for Abd: Thanks, Viridae. The advice could be generalized.
14:43 13-05-09 [77] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision The view from the cheap seats: responses, ideas.
14:18 13-05-09 [78] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision The view from the cheap seats: Agree. Especially with the "intelligent and good person" part!
13:58 13-05-09 [79] User talk:Abd Mills: the problem. Efficiency (necessary) vs. Fascism (excessive and dangerous)
11:38 13-05-09 [80] User talk:Abd Mills: very skilled con artist, or possible Nobel Prize winner? Fun. Let'
11:25 13-05-09 [81] User talk:Abd Mills: Truth will come out for those who look and watch and wait , don't you think?
05:22 13-05-09 [82] Robert Duncan (physicist) fix link text) (top) [rollback]
05:21 13-05-09 [83] Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Assessment/Assessment Drive/Lists/New16 moved article) (top) [rollback]
05:17 13-05-09 [84] Cold fusion replace biological transmutation link. As long as it's consensus that Condensed matter nuclear science and Low energy nuclear reactions redirect here, this belongs.
05:06 13-05-09 [85] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision Good advice for Abd: new section
04:58 13-05-09 [86] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision The view from the cheap seats: Thanks, Jehochman.
04:55 13-05-09 [87] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision The view from the cheap seats: Whoever is reviewing your logs, MastCell, it isn't me.
04:41 13-05-09 [88] User talk:Abd Mills: Summary: OMCV, go away. Your discussion here is not aimed at improving text but at ridicule and insult.
20:41 05-12-09 [89] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision So far so good.: new section
20:18 05-12-09 [90] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Inappropriate sourcing using newenergytimes.com: I see no way to assess due weight without making a content judgment
18:49 05-12-09 [91] Robert Duncan (physicist) start stub. more facts in Sci Am and other sources.
18:41 05-12-09 [92] Robert Duncan change to specify) (top) [rollback]
18:40 05-12-09 [93] Robert C. Duncan (astrophysicist) moved Talk:Robert Duncan (physicist) to Talk:Robert C. Duncan (astrophysicist): There is another physicist, Robert Duncan, vice-chancellor of research at the University of Missouri
18:40 05-12-09 [94] Talk:Robert C. Duncan (astrophysicist) moved Robert Duncan (physicist) to Robert C. Duncan (astrophysicist): There is another physicist, Robert Duncan, vice-chancellor of research at the University of Missouri
18:40 05-12-09 [95] Robert Duncan (physicist) moved Talk:Robert Duncan (physicist) to Talk:Robert C. Duncan (astrophysicist): There is another physicist, Robert Duncan, vice-chancellor of research at the University of Missouri) (top) [rollback]
18:40 05-12-09 [96] Talk:Robert Duncan (physicist) moved Robert Duncan (physicist) to Robert C. Duncan (astrophysicist): There is another physicist, Robert Duncan, vice-chancellor of research at the University of Missouri) (top) [rollback]
16:49 05-12-09 [97] User talk:Newyorkbrad Question about the Abd / JzG case: hope it's okay to comment here.
16:20 05-12-09 [98] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Inappropriate sourcing using newenergytimes.com: to judge "inappropriate" as to balance, we need to make content judgments. And with Cold fusion, the balance is far from clear. It's media RS vs. peer-reviewed RS.
15:09 05-12-09 [99] User talk:Abd Mills: respond at length.
11:34 05-12-09 [100] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Long, rambling messages: rambling? no, examining a topic from more than one POV, which is disconcerting to some.
11:12 05-12-09 [101] User talk:Abd Mills: no opinion on Mills.
02:38 05-12-09 [102] Talk:Cold fusion Undue Weight: hydrino theory, recent paper by Mills published in International Association for Hydrogen Energy (Elsevier)
02:06 05-12-09 [103] Talk:Cold fusion Some News: fmt
02:05 05-12-09 [104] Talk:Cold fusion Some News: yes, interesting.
21:04 05-11-09 [105] Talk:Cold fusion Undue Weight: actually, the straw poll was not about the version you have now been removing. It was about another version.
21:01 05-11-09 [106] Talk:Cold fusion Current or other version: This one is much more brief to address undue weight concerns. I reverted to it.
20:43 05-11-09 [107] Cold fusion revert per Talk. While it's possible this version is out of balance, current opinion seems to be that this is better than the version being reverted back. It addressed the undue weight concerned and is verifiable.
18:47 05-11-09 [108] User talk:Kirk shanahan Begin to narrow discussion: Kites can be flown.
18:31 05-11-09 [109] MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist lenr-canr.org (2): Agreed. Inferior or problematic source is better than no source, unless harm is greater than good.
18:21 05-11-09 [110] Talk:Cold fusion Undue Weight: well, it gets easier, if one is patient.
18:19 05-11-09 [111] Talk:Cold fusion A conference paper, not peer-reviewed: if the Vysotskii paper were the one presented a year later, I'd be claiming "notable minority opinion." Since that one is cited by Storms.
17:45 05-11-09 [112] Talk:Martin Fleischmann lenr-canr link: about "verified permission." That was an unstable overstatement of the guideline , removed the same day Verbal made his removal.
17:30 05-11-09 [113] Martin Fleischmann Conference proceedings: remove unverified reprint disclaimer per Verbal, revert this edit if you believe the disclaimer should be there.
17:25 05-11-09 [114] Martin Fleischmann Undid revision 286702999 by Verbal (talk)rv good-faith edit per Talk.
17:24 05-11-09 [115] Talk:Martin Fleischmann lenr-canr link: why I'm restoring the link: this decision was specific, and consensus was clear and settled until Verbal removed it.
17:18 05-11-09 [116] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Inappropriate sourcing using newenergytimes.com: actually, the link has been removed, and apparently nobody noticed, since it was a settled consensus after much discussion.
17:04 05-11-09 [117] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Inappropriate sourcing using newenergytimes.com: Short answer: Yes, of course, since you insist on an answer. But it's moot.
03:58 05-11-09 [118] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Inappropriate sourcing using newenergytimes.com: I love the sound of that parachute.
03:37 05-11-09 [119] Talk:Cold fusion I'm dropping work on the version of the article here: new section
01:16 05-11-09 [120] MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist lenr-canr.org (2): respond to question of alteration.
20:35 05-10-09 [121] User talk:Abd Re discussion on Newyorkbrad's talk page: stuff
20:06 05-10-09 [122] User talk:Newyorkbrad Point of information: Edit this to remove possible misunderstandings. Clarify a few comments.
14:30 05-10-09 [123] User:Abd/NPOV and how to find it create essay) (top
05:48 05-10-09 [124] Cold fusion Proposed explanations: by no means complete
05:45 05-10-09 [125] Blacklight Power Reactions in the scientific community: Uh, that was a BLP violation. Cold fusion isn't pseudoscience, got RS for that?
04:11 05-10-09 [126] Cold fusion Proposed explanations: heavy weight is placed on passing mention in a source showing no familiarity with the depth of replication. Remove that source, make text more neutral.
03:58 05-10-09 [127] Cold fusion Discussion: and this was redundant also! and "not observed" actually covers it. (By the way, this proposal isn't common in present CF theory.)
03:51 05-10-09 [128] Cold fusion 2.- The branching ratio: remove *quadruple* redundancy and make this more coherent.
03:45 05-10-09 [129] Cold fusion 1.- The probability of reaction: rate for what?
03:33 05-10-09 [130] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG admonished over Civility discussion: Further process on this is unlikely to come from me. JzG is not my target. Wasn't, and won't be.
03:13 05-10-09 [131] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Template: Oppose. Beetstra, you might give this proposal a title.
03:05 05-10-09 [132] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Inappropriate use of newenergytimes.com: Moot
03:04 05-10-09 [133] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Evaluation: grammar
03:02 05-10-09 [134] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Evaluation: Don't oppose a sound policy on the grounds that it will be applied mindlessly.
02:47 05-10-09 [135] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG desysopped: add 1.1 that practically begs for assurances from JzG
02:32 05-10-09 [136] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG and Cold fusion: important word dropped
02:27 05-10-09 [137] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Abd's zealous pursuit of dispute resolution: my, my, SBHB, AGF.
02:18 05-10-09 [138] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Discussion recommended: ack, that was a copy and paste, must have missed the first bracket
02:17 05-10-09 [139] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Discussion recommended: point to page noted by Beetstra
02:14 05-10-09 [140] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Analysis of evidence presented by Abd: not an expert except compared to Mathsci
01:39 05-10-09 [141] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG briefly desysopped: respond to Coppertwig.
01:35 05-10-09 [142] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG briefly desysopped: turn support to oppose: a slap on the wrist is punitive.
16:34 05-09-09 [143] Talk:Cold fusion Vysotskii and biological transmutation: much flap over no content.
16:29 05-09-09 [144] Talk:Cold fusion Reliability of sources: sign with original timestamp
16:21 05-09-09 [145] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Inappropriate sourcing using newenergytimes.com: Moot. Example.
16:20 05-09-09 [146] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Inappropriate use of lenr-canr.org: Moot.
16:19 05-09-09 [147] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Inappropriate sourcing using lenr-canr.org: Moot.
16:18 05-09-09 [148] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG's actions in blacklisting lenr-canr.org and newenergytimes.com: Oppose, and why.
16:14 05-09-09 [149] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG briefly desysopped: Support as adequate, proposed modification.
16:10 05-09-09 [150] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG admonished and instructed: Support.
16:09 05-09-09 [151] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Proposed Findings of Fact: sp
16:06 05-09-09 [152] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Proposed Findings of Fact: Support.
16:01 05-09-09 [153] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop No Personal Attacks: Support and explain.
15:53 05-09-09 [154] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Decorum and civility: support. One does wonder what proposals on this page JzG would support. I suppose he can respond at any time.
15:52 05-09-09 [155] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Evaluation: sign
15:51 05-09-09 [156] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Evaluation: respond to MastCell; I think the matter becomes very clear.
15:27 05-09-09 [157] User talk:Alecmconroy Thanks for your evidence at RfAr/Abd and JzG: add note re possible "disruption."
15:16 05-09-09 [158] User talk:Alecmconroy Thanks for your evidence at RfAr/Abd and JzG: sp
15:15 05-09-09 [159] User talk:Alecmconroy Thanks for your evidence at RfAr/Abd and JzG: typo
15:12 05-09-09 [160] User talk:Alecmconroy Thanks for your evidence at RfAr/Abd and JzG: new section
14:09 05-09-09 [161] User talk:Abd MgATP cyclotron: don't waste my time.
02:18 05-09-09 [162] Talk:Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder coatrack and undue weight issues: it's not necessary to make a determination of what is "fringe."
02:12 05-09-09 [163] User talk:Enric Naval Congratulations on your whitelisting: new section
02:04 05-09-09 [164] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Spam blacklist dispute resolved: two additional links to lenr-canr.org whitelisted.
01:56 05-09-09 [165] Cold fusion Bibliography: add convenience link, freshly whitelisted.
01:48 05-09-09 [166] MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist lenr-canr.org: Thanks, Beetstra.
01:40 05-09-09 [167] Talk:Cold fusion A conference paper, not peer-reviewed: technical point. There is a connection with cold fusion.
01:16 05-09-09 [168] Talk:Cold fusion Reliability of sources: Yes, this poll was set up abusively.
00:56 05-09-09 [169] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Discussion recommended: yes, indeed. Thanks, Beetstra.
20:14 05-08-09 [170] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG and Cold fusion: yet, it moves.
17:26 05-08-09 [171] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Abd urged: do I begin to see the dimensions of the problem?
17:18 05-08-09 [172] Talk:Cold fusion Reliability of sources: urk
17:17 05-08-09 [173] Talk:Cold fusion collapse disruptive poll. Don't poll over every disagreement! There should have been more discussion before the first poll, this one is beyond the pale.
17:02 05-08-09 [174] Talk:Cold fusion Vysotskii and biological transmutation: done here, for now.
16:54 05-08-09 [175] User talk:Enric Naval Is Storms RS? What about "heat dissipated into the lattice"?: about stuff and assocation.
16:50 05-08-09 [176] User talk:Enric Naval Is Storms RS? What about "heat dissipated into the lattice"?: new section
15:45 05-08-09 [177] Talk:Cold fusion Vysotskii and biological transmutation: on the polls.
15:36 05-08-09 [178] Talk:Cold fusion Vysotskii and biological transmutation: modify, the question contained an incorporated assumption.
15:34 05-08-09 [179] Talk:Cold fusion Vysotskii and biological transmutation: uncivil? How?
15:25 05-08-09 [180] User talk:EdChem Your comment about me on Talk:Newyorkbrad: fix link
15:24 05-08-09 [181] User talk:EdChem Your comment about me on Talk:Newyorkbrad: new section
15:20 05-08-09 [182] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Analysis of evidence presented by Abd: fmt
15:20 05-08-09 [183] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Analysis of evidence presented by Abd: recusal is actually a safety and a protection, but recusal policy does not trump WP:IAR.
15:15 05-08-09 [184] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Analysis of evidence presented by Abd: respond to Fritzpoll's questions; this is a common question among admins, and apparently more complete guidance is in order. Doesn't have to be done here, but AC can set some principles.
14:38 05-08-09 [185] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Analysis of evidence presented by Abd: respond to Matchsci.
14:09 05-08-09 [186] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG's administrator actions on Cold fusion: about the meta blacklisting, Beetstra is correct.
14:02 05-08-09 [187] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG and Cold fusion: reply to Carcharoth.
13:54 05-08-09 [188] Talk:Cold fusion Which is better?: clarify and specify.
13:53 05-08-09 [189] Talk:Cold fusion Vysotskii and biological transmutation: Hipocrite, have you read the DoE reviews? What does fraud have to do with this? Even Huizenga doesn't assert fraud, and Taubes' allegations were never supported.
13:43 05-08-09 [190] User talk:Abd Rewrite of Wikipedia:Spam blacklist: ce
13:41 05-08-09 [191] User talk:Abd Rewrite of Wikipedia:Spam blacklist: Thanks, Beetstra.
11:13 05-08-09 [192] Talk:Cold fusion Vysotskii and biological transmutation: Incorrect about Storms. Not a one-liner. 2 pages, one line is his reference to it as sufficiently reported to deserve theoretical attention.
08:18 05-08-09 [193] Talk:Cold fusion Vysotskii and biological transmutation: format
08:15 05-08-09 [194] Talk:Cold fusion Abd's version provides too much weight to a single, unreliable source: Did I get your intention right, Enric? (fix numbering problem.
08:11 05-08-09 [195] Talk:Cold fusion Vysotskii and biological transmutation: new section
08:09 05-08-09 [196] User talk:Newyorkbrad Point of information: well, I think I should answer this. Hope this is okay, NYB. and respond to EdChem.
07:11 05-08-09 [197] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Analysis of evidence presented by Abd: radical proposal: use peer-reviewed RS to determine what's in the article.
06:57 05-08-09 [198] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Abd urged: Eh? Okay, I promise.
06:45 05-08-09 [199] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Abd's zealous pursuit of dispute resolution: okay, if that's what you want to say. Is zealous good or bad? Could anyone who isn't patient and determined successfully deal with abuse by a popular admin?
06:19 05-08-09 [200] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Discussion recommended: Support.
06:16 05-08-09 [201] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG reminded: odd reluctance to assert actual involvement.
06:11 05-08-09 [202] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG's commitment to avoid further involvement: Sure. But.
06:00 05-08-09 [203] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Evaluation: Is recusal when involved optional? Merely "better" but it's fine if you don't?
05:43 05-08-09 [204] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Evolution of standards for "involved" administrators: Support the comment, but not the comment on the comment.
05:28 05-08-09 [205] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG's administrator actions on Cold fusion: this was *not* about a content dispute.
05:06 05-08-09 [206] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG and Cold fusion: oppose
04:46 05-08-09 [207] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Nature of the dispute: not "extensive noticeboard discussions" on the recusal topic.
04:24 05-08-09 [208] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Dispute resolution: Support
04:23 05-08-09 [209] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Avoiding even the appearance of impropriety: Support
04:23 05-08-09 [210] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Use of administrator tools in disputes: Support
04:22 05-08-09 [211] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Administrators: Support
01:51 05-08-09 [212] Talk:Cold fusion Condensed matter nuclear science: new section
01:30 05-08-09 [213] Talk:Cold fusion or muons: ruminate on V's proposal, why we can't do this with the article, and general considerations.
00:43 05-08-09 [214] Talk:Cold fusion or muons: no, not in the article just because it might make sense. We need a basis in reliable source, unless by some miracle we get clear, stable consensus on it. Ain't gonna happen.
20:39 05-07-09 [215] Talk:Cold fusion Other comments: no doubt that Version 1 needs improvement. It might be balanced, though, by moving the theoretical considerations in another section here.
20:27 05-07-09 [216] Talk:Cold fusion Current or other version: link to version current as of comment and to version as then edited by Hipocrite. Folks, feel free to update references for your !votes in this section.
20:13 05-07-09 [217] User talk:Objectivist Moved your comment in the poll at Cold fusion: new section) (top) [rollback]
20:04 05-07-09 [218] Talk:Cold fusion Other comments: fmt
20:03 05-07-09 [219] Talk:Cold fusion Which is better?: move V's comment to keep it tidy, I assume he will accept this, if he doesn't, he's welcome to revert me.
19:59 05-07-09 [220] Talk:Cold fusion Other comments: extended comment on Hipocrite's misunderstanding of consensus process, and implications.
16:43 05-07-09 [221] Muon-catalyzed fusion Some problems facing practical exploitation: cd "for" is colloquial for break-even and break-even means just less than what's needed for excess thermal energy.
16:23 05-07-09 [222] Talk:Cold fusion The elephant in the living room: What "proposed explanations"?: new section
15:19 05-07-09 [223] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Spam blacklist is for spam: naive view of experts, who tend to imagine that they are more qualified to judge what's important in a topic than non-experts or even other experts.
15:02 05-07-09 [224] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Enforcement of content policies and involvement: WP:DAS: Don't Assume Stupidity.
14:50 05-07-09 [225] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG desysopped: confirm that concerns were expressed by many editors.
14:40 05-07-09 [226] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Resolution of recusal failure: more as a party.
14:22 05-07-09 [227] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Analysis of evidence presented by Abd: ce
14:17 05-07-09 [228] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Analysis of evidence presented by Abd: this shows the danger of making quick assumptions without a detailed and balanced discussion underneath them.
13:52 05-07-09 [229] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Avoiding the appearance of impropriety: on the block of Rothwell. Yes, there was support, but there wasn't a process that considered it in sufficient depth.
13:38 05-07-09 [230] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Spam blacklist is for spam: this shows the problem we have with experts. They typically have a POV (or what looks to us like a POV). Arent't they supposed to advocate it in Talk? If done within behavioral guidelines, why not?
13:26 05-07-09 [231] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Please avoid repetition: a little more on a proposed process change.
11:24 05-07-09 [232] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Please avoid repetition: thanks, NYB.
11:19 05-07-09 [233] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Loci of dispute: Nice.
11:15 05-07-09 [234] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Spam blacklist is for spam: Thanks, Beetstra. Jed Rothwell Rothwell was in compliance with COI rules. We expect COI editors to "push" a POV, that's why we have COI rules!
02:36 05-07-09 [235] Devarda's alloy Long-debated question of the nascent hydrogen: sp
02:31 05-07-09 [236] Devarda's alloy Long-debated question of the nascent hydrogen: remove redundant word, misspelled to boot.
02:17 05-07-09 [237] User talk:Abd Verbal welcome to post here.: new section
00:27 05-07-09 [238] Cold fusion Reverted edits by Shinkolobwe (talk) to last version by ArthurBot
20:36 05-06-09 [239] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Analysis of evidence presented by Abd: comment on that first Talk page post. I suggest reading the RfC, it's got more detail, as I recall.
20:11 05-06-09 [240] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Analysis of evidence presented by Abd: not to make this into a content debate .... the point is strong POV, asserted over a long period of time.
19:43 05-06-09 [241] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Analysis of evidence presented by Abd: review Fritzpolls analysis; let's not forget the readers!
16:29 05-06-09 [242] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Abd admonished: how could I possibly object to good counsel?
16:16 05-06-09 [243] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Avoiding the appearance of impropriety: two heads are better than one, and can put wikilawyers out of business.
16:06 05-06-09 [244] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Avoiding the appearance of impropriety: about appearance of involvement and avoiding it with recusal at the drop of a glove.
15:48 05-06-09 [245] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Prior admonition: brilliant: call attention to EdChem's citation from RfAr/C68-FM-SV re desysopping in a ruling that appears to have covered JzG.
15:36 05-06-09 [246] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG not an uninvolved administrator with respect to cold fusion: that's great, A.B.! Thanks.
15:29 05-06-09 [247] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Loci of dispute: Mathsci is repeating arguments that have been made and considered in detail and rejected by consensus.
15:16 05-06-09 [248] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Spam blacklist is for spam: extended discussion of blacklisting
14:34 05-06-09 [249] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Administrators not to act unless uninvolved: more on recusal, "gaming the system" actually doesn't apply.
13:51 05-06-09 [250] User talk:Carcharoth The situation when ArbCom members are recused: some thoughts on this.
13:27 05-06-09 [251] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Collapsing of threads: I'd prefer to use collapse. It encourages me to organize into "most important" and "extended discussion."
03:46 05-06-09 [252] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Tools exist primarily to sanction behavior, not content: convenience links are important
03:25 05-06-09 [253] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG not an uninvolved administrator with respect to cold fusion: say maybe too much, this is going way too far afield. I'll stop now!
03:10 05-06-09 [254] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Loci of dispute: agree with AB on both points.
02:43 05-06-09 [255] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG not an uninvolved administrator with respect to cold fusion: sp
02:39 05-06-09 [256] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG not an uninvolved administrator with respect to cold fusion: attempt to clear up some confusion about administrative roles.
02:01 05-06-09 [257] User talk:Abd Hipocrite: missing word
01:59 05-06-09 [258] User talk:Abd Hipocrite: Dan, you surprise me, but I'll ask your advice any way.
22:54 05-05-09 [259] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Abd has confrontational style: fastest way to learn: be wrong. If you pay attention and aren't attached to being right!
22:35 05-05-09 [260] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG strongly admonished: thanks EdChem, nice.
20:18 05-05-09 [261] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Enforcement of content policies and involvement: Content policy is not to be "enforced with tools," excepting mission-critical policies like COPYVIO and BLP.
19:59 05-05-09 [262] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Spam blacklist is for spam: is this so difficult?
17:36 05-05-09 [263] User talk:Abd Hipocrite: wow! is this a hot-button topic or what. My Talk page, how about not reading it if it gets you upset. See the warning at the top of the page!
17:25 05-05-09 [264] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG admonished: like who?
17:22 05-05-09 [265] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG not an uninvolved administrator with respect to cold fusion: yes, we get it, Beetstra. What make you think we don't?
17:06 05-05-09 [266] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Spam blacklist dispute resolved: recusal can be for any reason, it doesn't refer only to recusal required by policy.
16:51 05-05-09 [267] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Enforcement of content policies and involvement: r to EdChem. Thanks, BTW, for other comments.
16:34 05-05-09 [268] User talk:Abd Hipocrite: Verbal, go away and stay away from my Talk page.
15:49 05-05-09 [269] User talk:Abd Hipocrite: please don't troll for reports to ANI; Enric, go away.
15:41 05-05-09 [270] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop add more, though.
15:38 05-05-09 [271] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Abd has confrontational style: recuse.
15:34 05-05-09 [272] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Spam blacklist is for spam: sure, it's possible. but the exceptions that make it possible don't apply and are covered, anyway, under WP:IAR.
15:25 05-05-09 [273] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Abd admonished: recuse but a little comment
15:19 05-05-09 [274] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG strongly admonished: two concerns
14:26 05-05-09 [275] Wikipedia:Requests for page protection Current requests for unprotection: correct error
14:19 05-05-09 [276] Wikipedia:Requests for page protection Requesting Unprotection of Condensed matter nuclear science. (TW)
14:11 05-05-09 [277] User talk:Abd Hipocrite: BTW
14:02 05-05-09 [278] User talk:Abd Hipocrite: complicated.
13:48 05-05-09 [279] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Enforcement of content policies and involvement: confirm and give example relevant to the basis for this case.
12:19 05-05-09 [280] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG not an uninvolved administrator with respect to cold fusion: Beetstra unable to see the forest for the trees.
04:13 05-05-09 [281] User talk:Abd Hipocrite: Usurpation
04:09 05-05-09 [282] User talk:Abd Hipocrite: tangled web.
03:42 05-05-09 [283] User talk:Abd Hipocrite: move from User talk:Abd/IP
03:41 05-05-09 [284] User talk:Abd Hipocrite: new section
03:39 05-05-09 [285] User talk:Abd/IP Hipocrite: move to my Talk page.
03:38 05-05-09 [286] Talk:Cold fusion Abd's version provides too much weight to a single, unreliable source: put comments back as apparently intended.
03:27 05-05-09 [287] Talk:Cold fusion Abd's version should be used but balanced: Thanks, Hipocrite, I've been trying to figure out how to keep # numbering with comments, now I see!
03:15 05-05-09 [288] MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist Norton AntiVirus: I'll ask the editor.
03:13 05-05-09 [289] User talk:TechOutsider Your February request at MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist: new section
02:52 05-05-09 [290] User talk:Stephen Bain JzG & Abd: Thanks, Bainer
02:45 05-05-09 [291] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence Bainer's evidence: I write what I see, I've been doing it for many years.
02:31 05-05-09 [292] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Dispute resolution is about compromise: about compromise and the limits of compromise.
02:03 05-05-09 [293] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG admonished: Fritzpoll's version below is better.
02:02 05-05-09 [294] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG strongly admonished: ce, sign
01:58 05-05-09 [295] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG strongly admonished: support conditionally.
01:46 05-05-09 [296] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG's use of the spam blacklist: whitelisting, suggested by blacklist admins as if it were easy, isn't. Many reasonable requests are denied, even where no linkspam hazard exists.
01:28 05-05-09 [297] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Collapsing of threads: hmmph. I wear bifocals, have for many years.
01:25 05-05-09 [298] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Use of administrative tools in a dispute: sign the original collapse with original time of edit
01:24 05-05-09 [299] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Use of administrative tools in a dispute: honor objection to collapse.
01:20 05-05-09 [300] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Use of administrative tools in a dispute: actually, strike this, no response, so I'm deleting it. Objection? restore with strike, thanks. (the word "content" shouldn't be there.)
01:03 05-05-09 [301] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Spam blacklist is for spam: meta and en.wiki are independent
20:56 05-04-09 [302] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Collapsing of threads: smalltext?
20:45 05-04-09 [303] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Spam blacklist is for spam: r to Jehochman. Important issue.
20:28 05-04-09 [304] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Administrators not to act unless uninvolved: "concerns were not about cold fusion, and it took three months, much disruption, an RfC, and the filing of an RfAr and a question from an arbitrator to extract an inadequate agreement.
20:14 05-04-09 [305] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Use of administrative tools in a dispute: move EN's comment (I expect EN won't mind that.) and respond to Jehochman.
19:29 05-04-09 [306] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Use of administrative tools in a dispute: support Fritzpoll's version as correct (as well as others)
19:23 05-04-09 [307] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Long, rambling messages: respond to Mathsci. Obviously, I was too brief for this editor.
19:21 05-04-09 [308] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Long, rambling messages: copy edit.
18:13 05-04-09 [309] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Long, rambling messages: fascinating.
16:43 05-04-09 [310] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Administrators not to act unless uninvolved: r to MastCell and Enric Naval
16:37 05-04-09 [311] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Administrators not to act unless uninvolved: another phony problem asserted to weaken recusal policy.
16:05 05-04-09 [312] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence Bainer's evidence: what it shows.
15:57 05-04-09 [313] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence Bainer's evidence: r to Bainer, thanks a ton!
15:48 05-04-09 [314] Cold fusion See also: why, shore, more than one way to remove epidermis from a feline.
15:45 05-04-09 [315] Talk:Cold fusion Abd's version provides too much weight to a single, unreliable source: separate responses from listed straw poll !votes
15:42 05-04-09 [316] Talk:Cold fusion Abd's version provides too much weight to a single, unreliable source
15:19 05-04-09 [317] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG desysopped: Enabling?
15:03 05-04-09 [318] User talk:Kirk shanahan Begin to narrow discussion: how bout fixing the terminology first?
15:00 05-04-09 [319] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG admonished: be bold!
14:59 05-04-09 [320] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG admonished: support and explain.
14:00 05-04-09 [321] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG desysopped: not out for blood. Desysopping is bloodless, preventative, not punitive. And if not on the table, more disruption will be likely.
13:49 05-04-09 [322] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG desysopped: ask Fritzpoll a question.
13:45 05-04-09 [323] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Spam blacklist dispute resolved: update with reference to Stifle recusal.
13:42 05-04-09 [324] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Long, rambling messages: if consensus is the goal, less is less.
13:37 05-04-09 [325] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG not an uninvolved administrator with respect to cold fusion: ce
13:30 05-04-09 [326] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG not an uninvolved administrator with respect to cold fusion: and to express the disagreement with Nick.
13:27 05-04-09 [327] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG not an uninvolved administrator with respect to cold fusion: agree generally with Nick and expand on it.
12:20 05-04-09 [328] Talk:Cold fusion Living organisms?: CMNS?
12:13 05-04-09 [329] Talk:Cold fusion Living organisms?: finish, sign.
11:26 05-04-09 [330] MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist lenr-canr.org: about copyright permission.
11:21 05-04-09 [331] MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist lenr-canr.org: thanks, Stifle.
11:19 05-04-09 [332] MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist meenaonthenet.com: Thanks, Stifle.
11:09 05-04-09 [333] Talk:Cold fusion Abd's version should be used but balanced: fix confusion
11:07 05-04-09 [334] Talk:Cold fusion Abd's version provides too much weight to a single, unreliable source: V is right.
11:00 05-04-09 [335] Talk:Cold fusion Abd's version does not overweight any source: we don't vote, but I consider a straw poll okay to delineate positions before the real process starts.
10:40 05-04-09 [336] Zero-point energy Experimental evidence for vacuum energy: punct
10:38 05-04-09 [337] Zero-point energy Experimental evidence for vacuum energy: clean up ref
10:27 05-04-09 [338] Infinite Energy (magazine) sp) (top) [rollback]
03:26 05-04-09 [339] Cold fusion These should be external links rather than See Also.
03:19 05-04-09 [340] Cold fusion Observations needing to be addressed by theory: add some footnotes (not full citations)
03:04 05-04-09 [341] Cold fusion Challenges to be face by theory: sp
03:03 05-04-09 [342] Cold fusion Challenges: header
03:02 05-04-09 [343] Cold fusion Undid revision 287564272 by Hipocrite (talk)Discuss in Talk.
02:56 05-04-09 [344] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG desysopped: reply to NYB.
02:47 05-04-09 [345] MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist lenr-canr.org: what was declined?
02:45 05-04-09 [346] MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist lenr-canr.org: Okay, some evidence.
02:33 05-04-09 [347] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG has not acknowledged his duty to recuse: and now ... the word "desysopped." I hope not, but it has to be said.
01:49 05-04-09 [348] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG has not acknowledged his duty to recuse: explain precedent.
01:42 05-04-09 [349] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Proposed principles: here it is, first mention of "removal of administrative privileges," but as a contingency.
01:25 05-04-09 [350] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Proposed principles: correct numbering
01:24 05-04-09 [351] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG has not acknowledged his duty to recuse
01:19 05-04-09 [352] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Proposals by Abd: JzG has not acknowledged involvement
01:12 05-04-09 [353] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Spam blacklist dispute resolved: whitelisting requested for convenience copy
01:10 05-04-09 [354] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Spam blacklist dispute resolved: definitely not resolved, whitelisting declined today.
00:48 05-04-09 [355] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence Bainer's "evidence": there is no commentary in the evidence Stephen transcribed.
00:18 05-04-09 [356] MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist meenaonthenet.com: incorrect to "defer to meta."
23:58 05-03-09 [357] MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist lenr-canr.org: revise comment
21:41 05-03-09 [358] MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist lenr-canr.org: Thanks for the prompt response. Tl:dr? moi?
21:33 05-03-09 [359] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence Bainer's "evidence": what commentaries?
21:25 05-03-09 [360] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Tools exist primarily to sanction behavior, not content: Risker is, of course, correct.
21:16 05-03-09 [361] Talk:Cold fusion How much weight for Storms book?: more source.
21:00 05-03-09 [362] Talk:Cold fusion How much weight for Storms book?: ref for Widom-Larsen theory. (article by Larsen).
20:59 05-03-09 [363] Talk:Cold fusion Living organisms?: some sources on this.
20:49 05-03-09 [364] Talk:Cold fusion Living organisms?: book review on this topic.
20:35 05-03-09 [365] Talk:Cold fusion How much weight for Storms book?: and now for something completely different
20:02 05-03-09 [366] Talk:Cold fusion How much weight for Storms book?: link to Kozima
19:58 05-03-09 [367] Talk:Cold fusion How much weight for Storms book?: title of paper
19:54 05-03-09 [368] Talk:Cold fusion How much weight for Storms book?: references to Storms.
19:20 05-03-09 [369] Talk:Cold fusion Regarding CF explanations: review by Scott Chubb
19:17 05-03-09 [370] Talk:Cold fusion Regarding CF explanations: interview with Storms.
19:00 05-03-09 [371] Talk:Cold fusion Regarding CF explanations: actually, Storms is RS and there is plenty besides.
18:51 05-03-09 [372] Talk:Cold fusion Removal of Storms material.: Most scientiests are employed or retained as consultants in their field! This is wikilawyering away reliable source, cut it out!
18:22 05-03-09 [373] Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Clerks Clerk attention required at Abd/JzG: sp
18:22 05-03-09 [374] Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Clerks Clerk attention required at Abd/JzG: remove extra sig
18:21 05-03-09 [375] Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Clerks Clerk attention required at Abd/JzG: question about use of section reserved for parties by non-parties.
18:15 05-03-09 [376] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Tools exist primarily to sanction behavior, not content: Support
18:00 05-03-09 [377] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop No use of admin tools by parties in a dispute: teeny
17:59 05-03-09 [378] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Long, rambling messages: we are also not paid by the hour to copy-edit discussion.
17:51 05-03-09 [379] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Spam blacklist: note re move of 3.2 struck by Jehochman.
17:47 05-03-09 [380] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Questioning of administrative actions: Support
17:45 05-03-09 [381] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Administrators not to act unless uninvolved: Support. Discuss bogus anti-recusal argument, often raised, probably needs some clear statement showing why it's bogus.
17:18 05-03-09 [382] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Spam blacklist dispute resolved: not accurate in substance. only technically.
17:05 05-03-09 [383] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Loci of dispute: Jehochman's request is reasonable.
16:53 05-03-09 [384] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Spam blacklist is for spam: Support. Jehochman invited to cite policy he claims is being changed.
16:32 05-03-09 [385] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG's use of the spam blacklist: clarify re "MediaWiki"
16:28 05-03-09 [386] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG's use of the spam blacklist: Support and comment
16:21 05-03-09 [387] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Prior admonition: Support and comment on finding of prior admonition.
16:04 05-03-09 [388] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG not an uninvolved administrator with respect to cold fusion: the links removed were not spam, nor were they vandalism.
15:37 05-03-09 [389] User talk:Abd What I do on Wikipedia: Here is where it goes!
15:36 05-03-09 [390] User talk:Abd Summarizing: wrong section!
15:35 05-03-09 [391] User talk:Abd Summarizing: propitiating the Durova its/it's demon.
15:34 05-03-09 [392] User talk:Abd Summarizing: thoughts on the dispute resolution proposal Coppertwig made.
15:25 05-03-09 [393] Talk:Cold fusion Lecture by Robert Duncan: about the lecture and implications
15:05 05-03-09 [394] Talk:Cold fusion Living organisms?: yes, there were controls.
13:40 05-03-09 [395] Talk:Cold fusion Removal of Storms material.: problem is that the alleged "mainstream" appears to be clinically dead, by the peer-reviewed publication meter.
03:53 05-03-09 [396] Talk:Cold fusion Removal of Storms material.: Note Hipocrite's removal of the section
03:03 05-03-09 [397] Talk:Cold fusion Removal of Storms material.: see above.
03:02 05-03-09 [398] Talk:Cold fusion Living organisms?: note
00:55 05-03-09 [399] User talk:Jehochman But, of course.: comment on the SA alleged block evasion.
00:38 05-03-09 [400] Talk:Cold fusion How much weight for Storms book?: reply
00:24 05-03-09 [401] Talk:Cold fusion Removal of Storms material.: new section
23:45 05-02-09 [402] Cold fusion Undid revision 287536726 by Olorinish (talk)Could I summarize this in one paragraph? No. You are welcome to try.
23:42 05-02-09 [403] Talk:Cold fusion Living organisms?: fmt
23:35 05-02-09 [404] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence normally requires at least two editors to blacklist: ce
23:34 05-02-09 [405] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence normally requires at least two editors to blacklist: I guess I didn't dot my i's and cross my t's.
23:24 05-02-09 [406] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Undid revision 287538613 by Abd (talk)oops! wrong section!
23:21 05-02-09 [407] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Proposed remedies: collapse unused sections
23:18 05-02-09 [408] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Proposed principles: extend comment, respond to Beetstra
22:11 05-02-09 [409] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Hipocrite removing and distorting Talk page discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop: Thanks. NCMV. I'll drop an archive template on this. If I'd done this yesterday, you wouldn't have wasted your time.
21:03 05-02-09 [410] Talk:Cold fusion NPOV - Undue: only "great wrong" I'm interested in is the possibility of an unbalanced article in terms of what's in the sources.
20:50 05-02-09 [411] Talk:Cold fusion Living organisms?: ce
20:49 05-02-09 [412] Talk:Cold fusion Living organisms?: wow! there actually is a "radiodurans"
20:45 05-02-09 [413] Talk:Cold fusion Living organisms?: pretty far out, eh?
19:57 05-02-09 [414] User talk:Abd What I do on Wikipedia: add qualification
19:49 05-02-09 [415] User talk:Abd Summarizing: my, what this led to..... new section, What I do on Wikipedia.
19:04 05-02-09 [416] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop No use of admin tools by parties in a dispute: Agreed. Jehochman, eh? What?
18:55 05-02-09 [417] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Content policies are enforced by editors: Agreed
18:54 05-02-09 [418] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Dispute resolution is not for punishment: Agree. Note that desysopping is not punitive, it's purely protective (properly). The issue is possible future behavior, predicted from past and present.
18:49 05-02-09 [419] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Long, rambling messages: widely held views can be dead wrong. The real question is what happens when the views are carefully examined. to find genuine consensus.
18:42 05-02-09 [420] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Long, rambling messages: is threaded response by non-parties in the Comment by parties section allowed? Do we need to wait for clerks to fix this? Guidance, please!
18:36 05-02-09 [421] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Proposed principles: ce
18:35 05-02-09 [422] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Proposals by User:Z: I think is where it goes.
18:32 05-02-09 [423] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Proposals by Abd: remove, this is in totally wrong place, will place below.
18:30 05-02-09 [424] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Template: title it!
18:28 05-02-09 [425] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Template: added "struck" qualification below but not here.
18:27 05-02-09 [426] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Spam blacklist: add proposal
16:58 05-02-09 [427] Cold fusion Challenges: cite that particular conclusion.
16:56 05-02-09 [428] Cold fusion Proposed explanations: add reference for this material., organize the section better.
16:49 05-02-09 [429] Cold fusion Proposed explanations: Begin with detailed coverage of theory from Storms (2007), who approaches theory in a very organized way.
16:44 05-02-09 [430] User talk:Abd Summarizing: about COI and summarization: No.
16:41 05-02-09 [431] User talk:Abd Summarizing: I can do it, all right.
15:17 05-02-09 [432] Cold fusion again removing POV tag. Do not replace tag without specific discussion shortly after removal of such a tag by consensus
15:01 05-02-09 [433] MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist lenr-canr.org: request link to early Martin Fleischmann paper.
13:59 05-02-09 [434] Talk:Cold fusion Removal of Park book: Yes, the original neutron findings were widely criticized, and they were retracted and never confirmed (at those high levels).
13:37 05-02-09 [435] Talk:Cold fusion Sourcing: attribute self-published material, it's essential.
13:28 05-02-09 [436] User talk:Abd Summarizing: Damn! you're good at that!
13:20 05-02-09 [437] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Request to narrow initial focus: collapse most moot argument. Request acceptance would have had to be timely to be of much service.
13:04 05-02-09 [438] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Spam blacklist: add expanded version that reflects actual and proper practice. Refactor my prior comments and add justification for 3.2
12:35 05-02-09 [439] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Policy and point of view: maybe there is a baby in this bathwater
12:16 05-02-09 [440] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Request to narrow initial focus: missed one
12:15 05-02-09 [441] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Request to narrow initial focus: fmt
12:13 05-02-09 [442] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Request to narrow initial focus: respond to NYB
12:01 05-02-09 [443] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Long, rambling messages: the long and the short of it.
01:59 05-02-09 [444] User talk:Olorinish Thanks.: new section) (top) [rollback]
01:24 05-02-09 [445] Talk:Cold fusion Removal of Park book: Thanks for the link to today's blog by Park.
01:14 05-02-09 [446] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Hipocrite's removal: too bad, not.
01:03 05-02-09 [447] Talk:Cold fusion NPOV - Undue: why I reverted Hipocrite's removal.
00:56 05-02-09 [448] Cold fusion Undid revision 287302392 by Hipocrite (talk)KB made no such suggestion. Don't remove sourced text without consensus.
00:35 05-02-09 [449] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence Evidence presented by Abd: other matters.
00:31 05-02-09 [450] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence JzG refused to acknowledge involvement or to recuse: ce
00:28 05-02-09 [451] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence Protected page edited (Spam-blacklist): remove discussion of evidence
00:26 05-02-09 [452] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence Protected page edited (Spam-blacklist): reword per Beetstra comments
00:22 05-02-09 [453] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence JzG has not shown the civility expected of administrators
00:21 05-02-09 [454] User talk:Abd The scope of the ArbCom Case: thanks, I'll be working on it.
00:05 05-02-09 [455] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence JzG long refused to acknowledge involvement or to recuse: fill out this section.
23:00 05-01-09 [456] User talk:Abd Undid revision 287343493 by Hipocrite (talk)remove trolling.
22:57 05-01-09 [457] User talk:Hipocrite Mentioned you at AN/I: new section
22:54 05-01-09 [458] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Hipocrite removing and distorting Talk page discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop: pinged both clerks.
22:50 05-01-09 [459] User talk:Hmwith Hipocrite at RfAr:Abd and JzG: fix link
22:49 05-01-09 [460] User talk:Hersfold Hipocrite at RfAr:Abd and JzG: fix link
22:48 05-01-09 [461] User talk:Hersfold Hipocrite at RfAr:Abd and JzG: new section
22:48 05-01-09 [462] User talk:Hmwith Hipocrite at RfAr:Abd and JzG: new section
22:38 05-01-09 [463] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Hipocrite removing and distorting Talk page discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop: okay.
22:34 05-01-09 [464] Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement Viridae: note frivolous request by frequent AE disruptor. Also move Jehochman comment, I believe it was in the wrong section.
22:23 05-01-09 [465] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Hipocrite removing and distorting Talk page discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop: new section
22:08 05-01-09 [466] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Undid revision 287252967 by Hipocrite (talk) I don't think this removal by Hipocrite was proper. He can strike his proposal, but not remove comments of others.
22:03 05-01-09 [467] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence Response of Abd to TenOfAllTrades Evidence.: don't edit my Talk page comments, Hipocrite.
21:55 05-01-09 [468] User talk:Literaturegeek It's a huge no-no to revert talk page posts on wiki: demonstrate collapse box
18:53 05-01-09 [469] User talk:Jmh649 Post at WP:WQA: suggestion
18:48 05-01-09 [470] User talk:Nja247 ADHD: Your removal of my comment was okay, Nja. So was the replacement by Bwilkins.... toss-up. Thanks.
18:26 05-01-09 [471] User talk:Abd WQA discussion: weird coincidence
16:45 05-01-09 [472] Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts Scuro and editors generally: how about accepting the commitment, Doc James? (even if you already have!)
16:33 05-01-09 [473] Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts Scuro and editors generally: speak of the devil.
16:10 05-01-09 [474] Talk:Cold fusion show paper.
16:04 05-01-09 [475] Talk:Cold fusion Sourcing: cite prior discussion and actual edit placing the source.
15:50 05-01-09 [476] Talk:Cold fusion Sourcing: r to Hipocrite and Verbal.
15:44 05-01-09 [477] Talk:Cold fusion NPOV - Undue: explain removal of POV tag
15:38 05-01-09 [478] Cold fusion remove npov tag, added with inadequate specificity of complaint in Talk, shortly after being removed with general acceptance.
15:37 05-01-09 [479] Cold fusion Undid revision 287265035 by Abd (talk)reverse my decision, will discuss in Talk or improve sourcing.
15:35 05-01-09 [480] Cold fusion Undid revision 287257320 by Hipocrite (talk)This source has been accepted by consensus. Seek Talk consensus before removal.
15:30 05-01-09 [481] Talk:Cold fusion NPOV - Undue: a spade is a spade, but I won't name it other than that.
15:22 05-01-09 [482] User talk:Abd Beantwo: sp
15:21 05-01-09 [483] User talk:Abd Beantwo: I've reverted my edit per your apparent consent to removal of the notice, nja247.
15:20 05-01-09 [484] User talk:Beantwo Undid revision 287261179 by Abd (talk)revert self, apparently nja247 consents to removal.) (top) [rollback]
15:13 05-01-09 [485] User talk:Beantwo Undid revision 287159084 by Beeblebrox (talk)revert SSP notice back in, removed in error.
15:03 05-01-09 [486] Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts Scuro and editors generally: comment
14:52 05-01-09 [487] User talk:Scuro May 2009: self-revert
14:51 05-01-09 [488] User talk:Scuro May 2009: respond to request to not use Talk page, acknowledging, will self-revert.
14:46 05-01-09 [489] User talk:Literaturegeek It's a huge no-no to revert talk page posts on wiki: not an accident, don't do it.
14:36 05-01-09 [490] User talk:Abd Barnstar: fix error
14:34 05-01-09 [491] User talk:Abd ADHD: advice.
11:15 05-01-09 [492] User talk:Scuro May 2009: follow DR, Scuro. It works. It means that you don't carry on a dispute all by your lonesome, beyond the first steps.
11:03 05-01-09 [493] User talk:Literaturegeek It's a huge no-no to revert talk page posts on wiki: reinforce warning.
