Voice your opinion on this candidate (talk page)
(?/?/?); Scheduled to end You're almost there. All you need to do now is substitute the time parser function (it isn't as scary as it sounds, edit the page and inline comments will guide you). This will generate a fixed end time. Remove the <!--
and -->
around subst:
in the template (as well as this comment) once you transclude this request.
Nomination
editUsername (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) – Your description of the candidate. Azxluraa (talk) 22:56, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Questions for the candidate
editDear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as a bureaucrat. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. Have you read the discussions on when to promote and not promote? What do you understand the criteria for promotion to be?
- 'A:'I understand I should promote when told to.
- 2. How would you deal with contentious nominations where a decision to promote or not promote might be criticized?
- 'A:'I do whats best for others and Wikipedia
- 3. Wikipedians expect bureaucrats to adhere to high standards of fairness, knowledge of policy and the ability to engage others in the community. Why do you feel you meet those standards?
- 'A:'I feel I meet those standards because I am onest and trustworthy. I will be spending alot of time on Wikipedia.
Discussion
edit- Links for Username: Username (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
- Edit summary usage for Username can be found here.
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.
Support
editOppose
edit
Neutral
edit
General comments
edit