 | The owner of this account is suspected of abusively using multiple accounts.
(Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets) |
Mother Tongue: Welsh
Patrilineal Tongue: Irish Gaelic
Tongue: Scottish Gaelic
Grandma Tongue: Scots
Grandpa Tongue: English
Tongue: Scottish English
→
If you wish to refute anything I have written because of your relationship to nationalism, nationality, or nations, I kindly ask you to relate to what I have written in relation to language instead.
Identity or ethnicity is a passive expression of linguistic historical fact.
A foreign immigrant, refugee, or slave, maintains an identity immediately in relation to words, passively in relation to ethnicity.
I think, therefore I am?
I talk, thus I was.
→
If you wish to relate anything in relation to Kingdoms, Republics, or such political institutions, be my guest.
Kings, politicians: talk.
You or I talk to them.
What we talk about to them is also linguistic historical fact.
→
Nationality, ethnicity, is zoology. The Animal Kingdom is of less size than you think.
Talk to your pet. It 'might' respond immediately in relation to words, though always again only passively in relation to zoology.
Animals that lack such a response are absent of a Kingdom.
A King rules, immediately, in relation to words.
Language without words is linguistically absent.
An animal simply is something. A figurehead. A shape attacking a shape. A shape that smells, tastes, makes noises.
Reading body language is reading those things.
To talk with your body is simply to imitate.
To talk with words is to be conceptual.
→
If you wish to write about battles within articles relating to Kingdoms, Republics, political institutions, or more broadly, politics, political theory, law, legal theory, please relate only how those battles relate to those things specifically, plus how a battle brought about a change in relationships, plus who was looking to impose what on whom in the first place, before relating what the imposition subsequently was, whilst relating if in any achievement in a settlement of these things occurs beyond the imposition, plus what the imposition or settlement did to those within (what could then be obsolete) political institutions, or those holding political or legal positions.
→
Beyond that, let's talk about archaeology, architecture, or geography.