This is a Wikipediauser page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bellezzasolo/Edits.
I am quite active counteracting vandalism. Have I reverted you? Maybe you're a vandal. Maybe not. If you aren't, talk to me, we all make mistakes. Or, you may have been acting in good faith, but don't quite grasp Wikipeida's Policies. Other than imploding vandals, I like to spend my time working on pages of particular note to me, for example My College.
My Edits by Namespace (as of February 2018)
Main (36.40%)
Talk (5.37%)
User (15.46%)
User Talk (20.53%)
Template (6.12%)
Module (2.96%)
Wikipedia (6.93%)
Template Talk (1.36%)
Module Talk (1.66%)
Other (3.21%)
My Edits by Namespace (as of December 2018, 10,000 edits)
My college. Naturally, I think it's the best in Oxford, but I manage to ensure WP:NPOV in the article - after all, the facts speak for themselves.
I've been working on fleshing out the article from start class - in particular history. However, I've been more successful at taking photos - sources are difficult to come by.
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.
My alma mater. Of course, similar story to above, except this time there are some WP:RSs that support my POV (naturally, NPOV still applies). I have to hand second place to Anglia Ruskin.
I've been working on improving the article, hopefully towards WP:FA. My main contribution so far is a wizz bang map template. Which is actually pretty cool, if I do say so myself.
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.
Following an RfC, there is a new criterion for speedy deletion: C4, which applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past.
The arbitration case Historical Elections is currently open. Proposed decision is expected by 3 September 2024 for this case.
Editors can now enter into good article review circles, an alternative for informal quid pro quo arrangements, to have a GAN reviewed in return for reviewing a different editor's nomination.