User:Bleff/sandboxcine

Cinema of Argentina
No. of screens	978 (2017)
Main distributors	United International Pictures 23.7% The Walt Disney Company 22.4% Warner Bros. 16.2%
Produced feature films (2023)
Total	235
Number of admissions (2023)
Total	44,447,934
National films	3,267,857 (7.3%)
Gross box office (2023)
Total	ARS 53.8 billion
National films	ARS 4.83 billion (8.9%)

The cinema of Argentina has historically been among the most developed in Latin America and one of the most recognized and influential in the Spanish-speaking world. What is known as Argentine cinema is often equated to the cinema of Buenos Aires, as the city and its metropolitan area have historically concentrated the majority of film production, although in every era there have been more or less isolated cinematic experiences outside the capital. Both the kinetoscope and the cinematograph arrived to Buenos Aires shortly after their creation and introduced the local public to the concept of motion pictures early on. The country's first films were made in the late 1890s and early 1900s by pioneers like cameraman Eugenio Py and businessman Max Glücksmann of the Casa Lepage, while the first narrative films emerged by the end of the decade, thanks to Mario Gallo. The 1914 film Amalia is often—albeit erroneously—cited as the country's first feature film, although its lavish premiere at the Teatro Colón, its association with high society, and its substantial revenue did open up new prospects for artistic prestige and commercial success in Argentine cinema.

From 1915 onward, the repercussions of World War I fueled a boom in Argentine silent films, surpassing production in other Spanish-speaking countries, which established Argentina as a leader in Latin American film production and spurred the first attempts to develop it as an entertainment industry. The 1915 premiere of Nobleza gaucha was crucial to this trend, becoming an unprecedented commercial success that led to a growth in local film activity. This period saw the release of several notable titles such as Hasta después de muerta (1916), El último malón (1918)—produced in Santa Fe–and Juan Sin Ropa (1919); as well as the world's first animated feature film with El Apóstol (1917). Concurrently, it marked the emergence of the first women directors, who would not occupy directorial roles for decades following the introduction of sound. By the 1920s, Argentine silent cinema had lost its initial momentum, eclipsed by the revival of European cinema and the unmatched rise of Hollywood's dominance, while struggling to establish itself as a sustainable industry. Nevertheless, the films of that decade—notably the work of José A. Ferreyra—played a crucial role in shaping later sound cinema by pioneering the integration of tango as a central theme and facilitating the professional development of several key figures of the sound era.

Argentina holds the record for the most Academy Awards for Best International Feature Film in Latin America, with two wins: The Official Story (1985) and The Secret in Their Eyes (2009); and has had a total of 8 nominations, making it the most recognized Latin American country in this category. Additionally, Argentina has won 19 Goya Awards for Best Ibero-American Film, more than any other country. In Sight and Sound's Greatest Films of All Time 2022, Lucrecia Martel's La Ciénaga (2001) was the only Latin American film on any list, appearing in 62nd place in the director's poll.

History

1894–1914: Pioneering years

View of the now-demolished Teatro Odeón in Buenos Aires, where the cinematograph was presented in July 1896.

Argentine cinema is almost as old as cinema in the world. The first early motion pictures introduced to Buenos Aires were Thomas Edison's kinetoscopes, which were brought by Czech businessman Federico Figner and presented on 18 September 1894—a few months after its first ever exhibition in New York City—in a special press screening. Although they consisted of small, single-view tapes, the kinetoscopes familiarized the local press and the general public with the concept of moving pictures, and the device came to be used as a parameter for all technical explanations regarding cinema.

https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=qOADz1T4H4MC&pg=PA101&dq=%22vivomatograph%22&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiCs4Gp0-yKAxXvppUCHVRqGFEQ6AF6BAgFEAI#v=onepage&q&f=false

but true film projections were only possible thanks to the Lumière brothers' cinematograph, with which a series of presentations were made on 28 July 1896 at the Teatro Odeón.

In 1897, the first projectors and cameras—from the Lumière and Gaumont firms—reached the country through Enrique Lepage's photography store, Casa Lepage. Their technician, the French Eugenio Py, became the first person to systematically film in Argentina; he shot the 1897 short La bandera argentina, a register of the national flag which is generally considered the country's first film. Other authors consider that the first films belong to the German Federico Fignero, who shot different views with a vitascope in 1896, aided by the camarographer José Steimberg. In addition to Lepage and Py, the third figure who dominated film production at this time was the Austrian Max Glücksmann, who was initially an employee of Casa Lepage and later acquired the firm in 1908. The works of these early years of Argentine cinema correspond to actuality films. As noted by historian José Agustín Mahieu, this stage of national cinema "naively discovers the magic of movement, the direct capture of the landscape, of the event. The camera is still a primary eye planted in front of the facts. Over any other concern (artistic or cultural) prevails the technical curiosity, the exploration of a tool that is just beginning to be known." Thus, a small-scale commercial exploitation began, with the Casa Lepage offering projectors and films to restaurants, cafes or other entertainment venues. The company dominated the country's film production for a decade, dedicating to filming curiositites and current events such as official state visits, festivities and tourist sights. In 1900, the first movie theater, the Salón Nacional, was inaugurated, and soon more venues dedicated to the projection of films were opened.

Although the topic has been little explored by Argentine film historiography, the country notably emerged as possibly the first major center for the production of pornographic films worldwide in the early 20th century. While pornographic cinema is generally considered to have originated in France alongside the birth of the medium, Buenos Aires became a hub for clandestine stag films, also known as "smokers". Around 1905, the French companies Pathé and Gaumont are reported to have shifted part of their production to Argentina in order to circumvent censorship in France. According to David Kerekes and David Slater, the red-light district of Buenos Aires at the time hosted the filming, projection and export of some of the earliest pornographic films, which were distributed to private buyers abroad. These productions were not intended for local or popular audiences but were marketed as a form of "sophisticated entertainment for the enjoyment of the wealthy classes of the Old Continent". Film historians Arthur Knight and Hollis Alpert noted that hardcore stag films were shipped by boat from Argentina to private clients, mainly in France and England, but also in Russia and the Balkans. Biographer Louis Sheaffer, in his account of Eugene O'Neill's life, mentions that the playwright traveled to Buenos Aires during this period and frequented pornographic screening rooms in the Barracas neighborhood. The Argentine film El Sartorio (sometimes referred to as El Satario) is often cited as the earliest surviving pornographic film. Believed to have been shot between 1907 and 1912 on the banks of the Río de la Plata in Quilmes or along the Paraná River near Rosario, it depicts six nude nymphs surprised by a satyr or faun who captures one and engages in sexual acts, including the 69 position. A copy of El Sartorio is preserved at the Kinsey Institute, which holds the world's largest collection of stag films.

At the end of the 1900s, the incipient Argentine cinema made significant progress with the appearance of the first narrative films, which encouraged production and distribution. These were the work of the Italian Mario Gallo, who had arrived in Buenos Aires a few years before as part of an opera company. There is confusion as to which was the first narrative film in the country: those who date its release in 1908 consider it to be El fusilamiento de Dorrego, while more recent researchers point out that this film is actually from 1910 and the first one was really La Revolución de Mayo, released in 1909. For this reason, May 23 is considered National Film Day in the country, in commemoration of the release date of the latter film. In the manner of the French film d'a rt trend, Gallo's films were closer to photographed theatre, almost always on historical topics.

• 
  View of the Teatro Odeón c. 1900, where the cinematograph was presented for the first time in 1896.
• 
  A frame of the Eugenio Py's La bandera Argentina (1897), long considered the first Argentine film in history.
• 
  French immigrant Eugenio Py is generally considered to have made the first films of the country in the 1890s.
• 
  A frame from Mario Gallo's La Revolución de Mayo (1909), regarded as the first narrative film of the country.
• 
  Portrait of Mario Gallo.
• 
  An article published in 1914 in the magazine Caras y Caretas about Max Glücksmann and the Casa Lepage.

1914–1920: Peak and decline of the silent era

A scene from Amalia (1914), a film financed by and starring members of Buenos Aires high society that offered new prospects of prestige and economic success to Argentine cinema.

The 1914 release of the film Amalia—based on the novel of the same name by José Mármol—was highly influential and marked a milestone in the development of Argentine cinema. The film's premiere on 12 December 1914 was an unprecedented event for national filmmaking, as it took place at the Teatro Colón, the most prestigious venue for the high society and aristocracy of Buenos Aires, with the presence of President Victorino de la Plaza and his ministers. Amalia was produced by Glücksmann, directed by playwright Enrique García Velloso and photographed by Py, shot in a very similar style to Gallo's films. The film was an initiative of the charity society Asociación del Divino Rostro, and its premiere was held with the "stated purpose of raising funds for the construction of a chapel and a school for girls." The characters were played by a long list of members of Buenos Aires' high society, presented in what Peña called "one of the longest title sequences in the entire history of cinema." Described as a "self-celebration show" for Buenos Aires' high society, the premiere of Amalia featured an unusually expensive ticket for a film screening and was accompanied by the Teatro Colón's orchestra. Contrary to popular belief, Amalia was not Argentina's first feature-length film, nor did it represent a stylistic breakthrough, as Nelly o la prima pobre was released the previous year, a 60-minute production sponsored by and starring members of elite charitable societies. Nevertheless, Amalia was the longest film up to that time, with an original running time of 3,000 meters, and is also the oldest surviving feature film of the country. As in 1912 and 1913, it was the only film released that year, but as Mafud pointed out, "unlike the previous ones, the trail that Amalia would leave would be much more important, both in 'artistic' prestige and in commercial possibility." By then, national production of fiction films had been stagnant for years, following a brief boom during on the occasion of the Centennial celebrations. Amalia had a pedagogical purpose centered on the ideals and tastes of the upper classes, which gave national cinema a new "moral and artistic prestige", as it was not only featured prominently in the society sections of major newspapers but also in theater reviews, initiating film criticism in Argentina.

Film still of Mariano Moreno y la Revolución de Mayo (1915). Produced by Glücksmann in an attempt to replicate the success of Amalia, it became the most expensive production of Argentine cinema up to that moment.

The influence of Amalia is evident in most of the following year's film production. On the one hand, it gave a notable boost to films linked to the elite's institutions, with at least three—El tímido, Deuda sagrada, and Un romance argentino—of the seven films released in 1915 being produced by benevolent societies. Additionally, the film demonstrated the financial potential of national cinema, pulling in over 35,000 pesos from just a few high-end screenings, where the cost of admission was set high for an exclusive, affluent crowd. For example, director Julio Irigoyen, who became the "paradigm of low-budget cinema", declared that he made his first film inspired by the economic success of Amalia and the high price of its tickets, stating: "Fifteen pesos a seat when in the best cinemas downtown you paid twenty... cents to see Pearl White, Charlie Chaplin, Maciste, etcetera!". Glücksmann himself was the first to try to replicate the success of Amalia and shortly after its premiere began filming Mariano Moreno y la Revolución de Mayo (1915), and in the course of the year built his own filming studio in the barrio of Belgrano. Unlike its predecessor, Mariano Moreno y la Revolución de Mayo premiered in commercial theaters, where it competed directly with the European productions that dominated the local screen. It also featured leading Argentine stage actors, such as members of the Podestá family and Camila Quiroga, who combined artistic prestige with wide popular appeal. With a budget of 70,000 pesos, the film was the most ambitious Argentine production to date and would remain so for several years, considering that film investments between 1915 and 1916 generally ranged from 4,000 to 50,000 pesos. Nevertheless, the film failed to achieve the expected success, and Glücksmann's plans to continue producing large-scale historical works—timed to coincide with the centennial of independence in 1916—collapsed. His subsequent films were made on much smaller budgets, and by 1916 he withdrew permanently from fiction production.

The unprecedented commercial success of Nobleza gaucha (1915) inaugurated a new boom period for Argentine silent cinema.

Glücksmann's efforts were informed by his role as the leading importer of films in 1914–1915, seeing local production as a way of addressing the crisis in a market heavily dependent on European cinema. With the outbreak of World War I in 1914, the film industries of France and Italy, the most important at the time, were severely affected and reduced their exports to markets such as Argentina and the rest of Latin America. At the same time, domestic demand for film was rapidly expanding, and the shortage of imports created an opening that could be filled with national productions. In this context, the retreat of European film production due to the war resulted in an abundance of Argentine production in the following years. As noted by Mahieu, during this time Argentine cinema "tends to abandon its character of empirical adventure, to become an entertainment industry. New distributors appeared, and in 1914 Pampa Film was founded, which produced several films." Argentina emerged as one of the most significant producers of fiction films in Latin America, notable for both the number of films made and the recognition they received. Favored by the war in Europe, the country experienced a "golden age" of silent films and led their production in Spanish, with more than 100 feature films being made between 1915 and 1924, equal to the combined total of those made in Mexico and Spain. During the first three decades of the 20th century, more than 200 silent feature films were produced in the country, in addition to a large number of documentaries, newsreels and shorter fictional works. By 1918, Buenos Aires counted roughly 120 cinemas, and trade journals alternated between enthusiasm and complaint about uneven programming, rushed projection speeds that distorted running times, and thin musical accompaniment, which pointed to a market expanding faster than its technical standards.

The release of the 1915 film Nobleza gaucha—a project by Humberto Cairo, Eduardo Martínez de la Pera and Ernesto Gunche—was a turning point in Argentine film history, opening new artistic and economic paths and paving the way for the profitability of national cinema. Unlike Amalia or Mariano Moreno, this rural drama set within the gauchesque tradition achieved success by featuring popular-class protagonists—a gaucho and an Italian smallholder—whose conflict over the abduction of a woman allowed broad social sectors to see themselves represented. Nicknamed "the goldmine" by distributors and exhibitors, Nobleza gaucha was an unexpected massive commercial success which remained in theaters for more than two decades,and was also released in Spain and several Latin American countries. The film received wide acclaim from the press, which praised it as comparable to the best foreign productions, and it became the highest-grossing film of Argentine silent cinema. Its influence was evident in the wave of explicitly national titles that followed its success, as distributors, programmers and exhibitors recognized their commercial potential, leading to a sharp growth of film activity with new producers and directors entering the field—though none matched the initial success of Nobleza gaucha. Martínez de la Pera and Gunche followed with the release of Hasta después de muerta (1916), Brenda (1921), Fausto (1922) and La casa de los cuervos (1923). Following the success of Nobleza gaucha, between 1915 and 1916 several investors in national films built or acquired shooting galleries and laboratories in Buenos Aires, among them Glücksmann, Martínez and Gunche, Cinematografía del Río de la Plata, Cóndor Film and Ortiz Film. By 1917, new companies such as Colón Film, Argentina Film, Austral Film, Platense Film S.A., and Mario Gallo's Talleres Cinematográficos had emerged, while other producers, lacking infrastructure, were forced to rent facilities or partner with these firms or smaller workshops for the technical production of their films. As noted by Fernando Martín Peña:

If anything characterizes Argentine silent cinema, even during its most prolific period, it is its dispersion and diversity. Instead of being concentrated in large companies, production appears atomized in dozens of independent enterprises, technically assisted by a relatively small number of specialists and laboratories (or "talleres" [workshops], in the terms of the time). This phenomenon explains its wide thematic variety and its singularities: in this mode of production, opposed by definition to the mass production favored by the big studios, the exception was the rule.

Cover of film periodical La Película in 1917 featuring Emilia Saleny, a pioneering woman filmmaker.

Unlike the later industrial system, the context of dispersed, small-scale production of silent films allowed the emergence of the first women filmmakers in Argentina. Among the earliest was Angélica García de García Mansilla, whose Un romance argentino (1915) was linked to the nationalist atmosphere preceding the centenary of independence; produced within charitable circles, it sought to associate the upper classes with the essence of the nation while also signaling cultural affinities with Europe and the United States. Around the same time, Emilia Saleny, originally an actress, founded an Academy of Cinematographic Arts and directed at least two children's films, while Antonieta Capurro de Renauld—also a teacher—produced a contested but early example of educational cinema for children, both cases rooted in contemporary debates about juvenile delinquency and the moral dangers of commercial film. María B. de Celestini, with a background in theater, directed Mi derecho (1920), a protofeminist work that challenged social conventions by depicting the right of a single woman to motherhood, a theme that echoed in her later plays. Another important figure was Elena Sansinena de Elizalde, later founder of Amigos del Arte, who was credited in some accounts as director of Blanco y negro (1920), based on a play by Henri Bernstein and possibly co-directed with Victoria Ocampo. According to Julio Noé, Sansinena's strong personality and leadership style suggested that any collaborators "were chosen, encouraged, and infused with her fervor". Although these contributions were scattered and often tied to elite cultural projects, they reveal how women directors and screenwriters helped shape segments of Argentine silent cinema before the rise of industrial production in the 1930s effectively excluded them for decades.

A cutout figure of President Hipólito Yrigoyen used in Quirino Cristiani's El apóstol (1917), the world's first animated feature film.

Between 1916 and 1917, national film production grew sharply, rising from 7 releases in 1915 to 26 in 1916 and 21 in 1917. Successful titles like Bajo el sol de la pampa (1916), Resaca (1916), Hasta después de muerta (1916) and Santos Vega (1917) reflected audiences' desire to see familiar actors and local themes on screen. The emerging film industry drew heavily on established cultural forms, particularly the national theater. Producers frequently recruited leading stage actors, whose popularity was highlighted in advertising, and film schedules often had to adjust to their theatrical commitments or tours. Theatrical circles, in turn, were attracted by the new medium, which promised fame and financial reward comparable to that enjoyed by foreign film stars. The commercial theater provided plots and adaptations, while variety theaters integrated film into their shows and performers carried over their characters and styles to the screen, creating a process of cross-pollination between stage and cinema. At the same time, exhibitors and publicists embraced modern promotion: large color posters, richly illustrated magazines and prominent press ads became routine. The local press also intensified coverage, dedicating regular columns to film news and inflating anticipation for national releases with lists of costs, stars and production details. Cinema's ties with the press were strong, with periodicals such as Fray Mocho, Crítica and PBT organized screenwriting contests to finance and promote films. Newspapers also inspired genres, as caricaturists supplied early animation, comic strips were adapted into films, and crime reporting fed both documentaries and fiction features. Cartoonist Quirino Cristiani directed El apóstol (1917), the first animated feature film in world history. Combining political satire with innovative cut-out techniques, the work established Argentina as a pioneer in animation, though it is now lost.

A scene from Santos Vega (1917), directed by Carlos de Paoli, with José Juan Podesta in the title role.

Nevertheless, the momentum was fragile and the nascent industry could not withstand the massive influx of U.S. films beginning in 1917, which quickly reasserted foreign dominance over the Argentine market. The outbreak of World War I not only curtailed European film production and exports but also facilitated the emergence of the United States as the world's leading cinematic power. American films were perceived as more naturalistic and dynamic, contrasting with the theatricality of Italian productions, and their arrival reshaped audience tastes while exposing the technical and aesthetic limitations of Argentine films. The massive influx of U.S. productions, supported by aggressive publicity, quickly dominated the exhibition circuit, restricting the distribution of national works. U.S. companies flooded the market not only with recent releases but also with previously unavailable titles, including superproductions like The Birth of a Nation (1915), Intolerance (1916) and Cleopatra (1917), all of which premiered in Buenos Aires in 1919 with unprecedented publicity campaigns. The absence of fixed weekly programming meant that competition among exhibitors for access to foreign releases was intense, and local films were often relegated to marginal slots or excluded from downtown theaters altogether. The high cost of U.S. exclusivity contracts further disadvantaged Argentine distributors, who paid much more than their French or Brazilian counterparts, while producers were forced to charge ticket prices equal to or higher than those of technically superior foreign films. Dependence extended beyond exhibition: most raw film stock, especially Kodak celluloid, also had to be imported from the United States at inflated prices. These structural conditions, compounded by the fragility of the local industry, led to stagnation: Argentine film output fell to 16 in 1918 and 1919, and to only 9 in 1920. Press outlets began calling for protective measures, such as tariff exemptions on raw film stock, subsidies for local production, or tax reductions for cinemas showing Argentine films. By late 1917, journals openly described a "heavy and unpleasant" climate; unions of exhibitors and operators drafted statutes to defend the sector from punitive taxes and patent fees, while the same magazines admitted that close to 90% of their pages now celebrated U.S. cinema at the expense of local work. Despite demands, no government policies were implemented during this period.

Juan Sin Ropa (1919), directed by Georges Benoît and produced alongside its protagonists Camila and Héctor Quiroga, is one of the most celebrated films of the Argentine silent era.

In the aftermath of U.S. dominance, two opposing tendencies emerged in Argentine cinema in 1919, both paradoxically influenced by U.S. models. One sought to attract major investment by hiring renowned stage actors, successful playwrights, and experienced foreign directors to create "quality" productions comparable to U.S. films but rooted in national themes. This approach was exemplified by En buena ley (1919), a rural drama written by José Mazzanti and directed by Italian Alberto Traversa, and Juan Sin Ropa (1919), a social melodrama by playwright José González Castillo and French director Georges Benoît. Regarded as one of the greatest Argentine films of the silent era, Juan Sin Ropa has been praised for its expressive close-ups and dynamic editing, which Kevin Brownlow judged superior to comparable sequences in Griffith's Intolerance. The other trend during the era was defined by low-budget productions from small publishers, aesthetically shaped by American techniques and genres but adapted to local elements. Represented by works such as José A. Ferreyra's Campo ajuera (1919) and Roberto Guidi's El mentir de los demás (1919), it found its main advocate in Leopoldo Torres Ríos (a future filmmaker and one of the country's first film critics), who urged filmmakers to avoid costly failures, form actors and directors within cinema itself rather than importing theatrical conventions, and cultivate new talent from among young film enthusiasts. The coexistence of both models proved difficult. Producers like Mario Gallo and Héctor Quiroga soon abandoned fiction filmmaking, despite Juan Sin Ropa's success, citing the overwhelming presence of foreign films and the need to conquer external markets through coproductions with European capital. Torres Ríos, in contrast, argued that only sustained low-cost, technically solid production could attract audiences and eventually larger investments, while warning against amateurs and opportunistic distributors who undermined the reputation of national cinema. It was filmmakers aligned with this second current who would carry Argentine production forward through the silent era, though both approaches contributed to the technical advances recognized by critics in the early 1920s. By late 1919, discussion turned to the need for a consolidated national industry, though the absence of adequate legislation on raw film stock, burdened by high import tariffs and the lack of government support left local production at a disadvantage. Despite isolated artistic successes, the industry found itself increasingly cornered as it entered the 1920s.

1920–1933: The 1920s and the transition to sound

Argentino Gómez, Berta Singerman and Santos Casabal in La vendedora de Harrods (1921), directed by Francisco Defilippis Novoa.

In the early 1920s, Argentine cinema was going through a period of uncertainty caused, on the one hand, by the recovery of the European film industry after the end of World War I and, on the other, by the ascent of Hollywood cinema to a position of unparalleled international dominance. This situation was explicitly denounced in 1922 by Leopoldo Torres Ríos, who lamented: "When they show an Argentine production, they do it as if it were alms. Those same gentlemen endure daily the cinematographic detritus sent from the East to the West and our public, on their immense, broad backs, carries it without a protest." The most notable successes of this period in Argentine cinema did not stem from the competing trends that had defined the previous decade. The first major box-office hit was La vendedora de Harrods (1921), directed by Francisco Defilippis Novoa, an adaptation of Josué Quesada's popular novel. Premiering under adverse conditions on a Monday, the film achieved exceptional public acclaim despite receiving lukewarm reviews from critics. Its success continued a line inaugurated in 1917 with Delfina (1917–1919), based on the novel by Manuel T. Podestá, and Flor de durazno (1917), adapted from Hugo Wast. These productions brought to the screen works by widely read, if not always critically prestigious, authors whose novels were published in mass-market series such as La Novela Semanal, Biblioteca La Nación and La Novela del Día. The release of a film often boosted the circulation of these novels, while in reverse, short novels were sometimes written to accompany or expand upon the storylines of recently released films.

Advertisement for Milonguita (1922), directed by José Bustamante y Ballivián.

This model of adaptation attracted other popular writers. Juan B. Lecuona founded Estrella Film to bring his novel El triunfo de la verdad to the screen, while Hugo Wast established Hugo Wast Film in 1922 to produce adaptations of his own works, including La casa de los cuervos (1923), Valle negro (1924) and Pata de zorra (1924). At the same time, literary classics of the 19th century were also adapted, as in Martín Fierro (1923), El Fausto criollo (1922), El puñal del mazorquero (1923, based on Juana Manuela Gorriti), and La epopeya del gaucho Juan Moreira (1924). Another major success was Milonguita (1922), directed by José Bustamante y Ballivián, which highlighted cinema's growing association with tango, then at the height of its popularity. The film extended a cultural cycle that began with the tango of the same name by Enrique Delfino and Samuel Linning, premiered in the sainete Delikatessen Haus in 1920, subsequently recorded by Carlos Gardel, and widely disseminated through printed sheet music. Linning also authored a sainete titled Milonguita in 1922, the same year the film was released. For the film version, Delfino himself provided the score, performed live by his orchestra during screenings. This marked the consolidation of the first "tango melodrama" model in Argentine silent cinema, a trend that would continue with titles such as La cieguita de la avenida Alvear (Julio Irigoyen, 1924) and La borrachera del tango (Edmo Cominetti, 1928). Tango soon became a dominant presence in the music accompanying films, including foreign productions. Its influence expanded with La muchacha del arrabal (1922, José A. Ferreyra), where music by Roberto Firpo was performed live, and Melenita de oro (1923), inspired by another tango by Linning.

Advertisements for José A. Ferreyra's La chica de la calle Florida (1922) published in trade magazine Excelsior.

The combined success of La vendedora de Harrods and Milonguita, along with other profitable productions such as Ferreyra's La chica de la calle Florida (1922) and Nelo Cosimi's El remanso (1922), signaled the possibility of a sustainable national cinema industry. Film production increased from around 15 titles in 1921 and 12 in 1922 to 24 in 1923. This growth sparked renewed debate in the press on measures to protect and encourage local cinema, including proposals for tax exemptions, an annual state-sponsored prize for the best film, and the creation of a national cinema day. None of these initiatives were implemented, and the fragile industry relied instead on self-organized institutions. These included the Unión Filmadores Argentinos (1923), which briefly sought to consolidate producers; the distributor Selección Nacional, dedicated exclusively to Argentine films; and the Asociación Cinematográfica Nacional, which brought together professionals from across the field to promote local productions. Public attention also expanded through media coverage of film actors, with magazines and newspapers publishing photographs, interviews, and feature articles. This culminated in the publication of Roberto Gustavino Molinari's Estrellas del cine (1923), a book of interviews with leading actors, reflecting the early formation of a local star system.

Nelo Cosimi and Blanca Podestá in Manuelita Rosas (1925), directed by Ricardo Villarán.

Despite this apparent boom, the industry remained precarious. Organizations like the Unión Filmadores Argentinos quickly dissolved, Selección Nacional ceased operations in 1924, and the local star system proved unstable. Production was dominated by small companies such as Julio Irigoyen's Buenos Aires Film, which in 1923–1924 released 7 films, including Sombras de Buenos Aires and De nuestras pampas. Irigoyen, who had founded Buenos Aires Film as early as 1913, specialized in rapid, very low-budget productions of melodramatic and popular subjects. His film De nuestras pampas (1923) also marked the screen debut of José Gola, later a celebrated star of the sound era. While financially successful, these works were often criticized for their low budgets, brief shooting schedules, and aesthetic shortcomings when measured against the dominant American narrative model. In this way, Buenos Aires Film came to epitomize precisely the type of cinema that earlier pioneers such as Mario Gallo, Héctor Quiroga and Roberto Guidi—and even the inconsistent José A. Ferreyra—had sought to overcome. Alongside Irigoyen, other directors were central to sustaining silent film production in the 1920s. Nelo Cosimi, an Italian-born actor who turned to directing with El remanso (1922), often combined the roles of filmmaker, screenwriter and actor, and later remained active as an actor in the sound era until his death in 1945. His films included El lobo de la víbora, La mujer y la bestia and Federales y unitarios (1927). Edmo Cominetti, with prior experience in photography, directed his first film in 1920 and gained attention with Bajo la mirada de Dios (1926)—which was even screened in the United States—and La borrachera del tango, acclaimed by critics and audiences alike.

María Turgenova and Ermete Meliante in Perdón, viejita (1927), directed by José A. Ferreyra.

Ferreyra, who began his career in the mid-1910s, is considered the most important Argentine filmmaker of the 1920s, and continued to be a central figure during the transition to sound and later in the classical-industrial period. His prolific output during the silent period positioned him as an intuitive and popular chronicler of Buenos Aires life, and his work became the most complete form of the silent "tango melodrama" model. Considered a precursor of neorealism, Ferreyra's influential style was characterized by its profoundly local identity, with characters and situations linked to the world of tango lyrics and the urban working classes of Buenos Aires, in whose streets he filmed with low resources and often starring non-actors. His films, often melodramatic but deeply rooted in the everyday world of the arrabal, earned him the nickname of a "minor poet of the suburbs" for their portrayal of archetypal characters with a fresh and simple authenticity, akin to the tone of poet Evaristo Carriego. Many of Ferreyra's titles point to a connection with the mythology of the city and its music: La muchacha del arrabal (1922), Buenos Aires, ciudad de ensueño (1922), Mi último tango (1925), El organito de la tarde (1925), Muchachita de Chiclana (1926), La vuelta al bulín (1926) and Perdón, viejita (1927), among others. Some of these films were based on specific tangos while others inspired the composition of new tangos, and also incorporated other elements of popular culture such as sainete and serial novels. As noted by film historian Jorge Miguel Couselo: "In Ferreyra, also a sporadic lyricist, the identification with tango is total. His adherence to Buenos Aires, to the most needy and suffering face of Buenos Aires, is a porteñismo of soul, temperament and habit, synonymous with tango. The subject matter of his films is tango, an eager search to discover the dramatizable facets of the city song, its habitat, its types, its conflicts, its symbolic candor, its accessible tragedy."

María Turgenova in José A. Ferreyra's Muñequitas porteñas (1931), one of the first sound films in the country, which used the sound-on-disc technique.

Around 1929, the inventor Alfredo Murúa—founder of Sociedad Impresora de Discos Electrofónicos (SIDE)—became a partner of the Ariel production company, and produced the short film Mosaico criollo, with his own sound-on-disc system. Mosaico criollo, the first instalment of an intended series, is not a spoken film but rather a filmed "musical revue". Murúa was responsible for the sound of most of the Argentine sound films made between 1931 and 1933, always using the sound-on-disc technique. The most important was Muñequitas porteñas (1931) by Ferreyra, for its pioneering use of spoken dialogue, although there were several others that used it partially, such as Amanecer de una raza (1931) by Cominetti, El cantar de mi ciudad (1930) by Ferreyra or La vía de oro (1931) by Cominetti; or that used sound to record only music and sound effects, among them ¡Adiós Argentina! (1930) by Mario Parpagnoli, La canción del gaucho (1930) by Ferreyra or Dios y la patria (1931) by Cosimi. It also happened that originally silent films were re-released with new sound added, as in the case of Nobleza Gaucha and Perdón, viejita, among others. As noted by Fernando Martín Peña: "In this sense, the transition [from silent to sound films] was complex and very similar to that which had just taken place in the United States and Europe."

Carlos Gardel in Luces de Buenos Aires (1931), the first in a series of films produced by Paramount Pictures featuring the tango star that were decisively influential on the incipient local producers.

As in other countries, the arrival of sound films put in check the international dominance of American cinema due to the language barrier, leaving a market available. This situation was analogous to the one that occurred during World War I, when the European film crisis benefited Argentine producers. Hollywood tried to deal with these difficulties with attempts at dubbing that ended up failing and also with various forms of subtitling, although this still required technical development and also excluded illiterate audiences. Eventually, the U.S. industry reacted by making little accepted Spanish-language versions of its most important productions, although they found the greatest success once they began to make produce original Spanish-language films made to showcase Latin American stars. Among them, the 1931–1935 films made by Paramount Pictures starring Carlos Gardel stood out, and became a major influence on the emergence of an Argentine sound film industry. Before being hired by Paramount, Gardel—the most popular performer in the history of tango—had starred in a series of short films using optical sound between 1930 and 1931, which were directed by Eduardo Morera and produced by Federico Valle. The first of Gardel's feature films produced by Paramount was Luces de Buenos Aires, released in September 1931 to great success. By this time optical sound had demonstrated its advantage over disc systems, so the equipment was progressively replaced in a process that lasted throughout 1932.

Despite being foreign productions, Gardel's films may be considered as part of the history of Argentine cinema, as they were conceived by the singer himself together with other Argentine artists (like his lyricist Alfredo Le Pera or revue producer Manuel Romero), and their model corresponded to that of the tango dramas directed by Ferreyra during the silent era, resulting in a strong Argentine identity. In addition, their great commercial success demonstrated the commercial viability of a cinema of Argentine identity for the incipient local producers that would inaugurate the Golden Age period in 1933. Paradoxically, Hollywood's attempt to dominate the local market would soon result in the birth of the national industry, which would take Gardel's films as a model to be replicated. According to Peña, the success of Gardel's films was "in fact the success of Ferreyra's and Torres Ríos' ideas taken up by a popular idol and legitimized for the local culture because of their 'foreign' condition". In an interview, Argentine film historian Clara Kriger felt that: "... we [Argentine film historians] always say 'in 1933 the industry was born in Argentina', and the truth is that I would say that until Gardel appeared in films, Argentine cinema practically did not exist on billboards; very little Argentine cinema was being seen. Gardel is what gives Argentine cinema that strength on the billboards." Another aspect little mentioned by historians is that the last four Paramount productions with Gardel were in fact the singer and Le Pera's own productions that the studio agreed to finance, with full property rights for both creators after a first period of commercial exploitation.

1933–1956: The "Golden Age" or classical-industrial period

Main article: Golden Age of Argentine cinema

1956–1973: The era of modernism and political cinema

https://ahira.com.ar/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/El-Amante-135.pdf

• 
  Elsa Daniel and Lautaro Murúa in Leopoldo Torre Nilsson's La casa del ángel (1957).
• 
  Alberto de Mendoza and Rossana Zucker in El jefe (1958), directed by Fernando Ayala.
• 
  Film still of Lautaro Murúa's Shunko (1960).
• 
  The actresses Olga Zubarry, Alba Mujica, Elsa Daniel and Aída Luz, and director Vlasta Lah, during the filming of Las furias (1960).
• 
  The impoverished children of Santa Fe portrayed in Fernando Birri's Tire dié (1960).
• 
  Alberto Argibay and Virginia Lago in Alias Gardelito (1961), directed by Lautaro Murúa.
• 
  Luis Medina Castro and María Vaner in Tres veces Ana (1961), directed by David José Kohon.
• 
  Héctor Pellegrini and María Cristina Laurenz in Rodolfo Kuhn's Pajarito Gómez (1965).
• 
  Libertad Leblanc in Héctor Olivera's Psexoanálisis (1967), with set design by pop artist Edgardo Giménez.
• 
  Diego Puente in Crónica de un niño solo (1965), directed by Leonardo Favio.
• 
  Isabel Sarli in Carne (1968), directed by Armando Bó.
• 
  Graciela Borges in Leonardo Favio's El dependiente (1969).
• 
  Alberto Fernández de Rosa and Ana María Picchio in David José Kohon's Breve cielo (1969).
• 
  Experimental filmmaker Narcisa Hirsch with a Super 8 film camera, c. 1970s.

1973–1976: The "Camporist spring" and political violence

Poster of Leonardo Favio's Juan Moreira (1973), featuring Rodolfo Bebán in the title role.

The return of democracy in 1973 opened a brief but decisive chapter for Argentine cinema. On 25 May, Héctor J. Cámpora assumed the presidency with 50% of the electorate, ending eighteen years of Peronist proscription, and placed Hugo del Carril and Mario Soffici at the head of the Instituto Nacional de Cinematografía (INC). In August, Octavio Getino was appointed interventor of the Ente de Calificación Cinematográfica with the dual purpose of promoting a new film law to abolish censorship and, in the meantime, to prevent cuts and bans. Although Del Carril's presence was largely symbolic given his residence abroad, Soffici pursued active management, enforcing labor regulations, reviving the Sindicato de la Industria Cinematográfica Argentina (SICA), and reactivating the Cámara de la Industria Cinematográfica as a coordinating body. Getino's own appointment carried symbolic weight: as a figure associated with the Grupo Cine Liberación, he now assumed responsibility for an institution that his generation had long criticized.

These domestic changes unfolded in a wider international context marked by U.S. strategic setbacks. In March 1976, Henry Kissinger acknowledged that 6decades of Soviet industrial-military expansion had brought Moscow close to parity with Washington—an admission that would have been unthinkable a decade earlier. This new balance coincided with U.S. defeats in Indochina and the rise of independence movements in Africa, which undermined the economies and political confidence of Europe and the United States. In this scenario, Europe became the main arena of political negotiation, while Latin America remained a U.S. preserve. The Southern Cone, where leaders such as Salvador Allende, Juan José Torres, Juan Velasco Alvarado, and Juan Domingo Perón had promoted projects of autonomous development, was targeted for rollback, and local "demolition forces" were mobilized to neutralize those experiments.

Jorge Villalba, Federico Luppi and Pepe Soriano in La Patagonia rebelde (1974), directed by Héctor Olivera.

Argentina thus became both an exception and a battlefield. While neighboring Uruguay and Bolivia had already succumbed to authoritarian counteroffensives, Cámpora's May 1973 victory and Perón's subsequent electoral triumph with nearly two-thirds of the vote created a climate of massive political participation. The atmosphere was symbolized in cinema by Leonardo Favio's Juan Moreira, released on the eve of Cámpora's inauguration, which struck a chord with audiences by revisiting themes of social injustice through the figure of the marginalized gaucho. Its commercial success owed less to cinematic qualities than to the mood of national liberation that animated large sectors of workers, intellectuals and the petite bourgeoisie.

Within this context, the INC and the Ente initiated a radically different cultural policy. Getino's 90 day tenure at the Ente was conceived as an "unprecedented experience" of counter-censorship. He convened a multidisciplinary advisory council—including filmmakers, critics, psychologists, sociologists, religious figures and labor representatives—intended to replace the "moralist" leagues that had previously dominated censorship bodies. He organized public screenings at cultural institutions and unions where audiences debated films before they were classified, giving spectators an unprecedented sense of autonomy. At the same time, the Ente authorized works that had long been banned or delayed, ranging from La hora de los hornos to international films by Godard, Pasolini, Kubrick, Bertolucci and Costa-Gavras. The most controversial case was Bertolucci's Last Tango in Paris, whose October 1973 premiere sold out theaters but provoked judicial actions against Soffici and Getino, the seizure of prints, and repeated prosecutions that pursued Getino into exile.

The cast of Daniel Tinayre's La Mary (1974). Sitted: Carlos Monzón and Susana Giménez. Standing up: Leonor Manso, Juan José Camero, Alberto Argibay, Dora Baret, Jorge Rivera López and Olga Zubarry.

The INC's agenda was equally ambitious. Soffici encouraged broad union renewal: SICA elected new leadership, the directors' guild incorporated younger figures, and independent producers organized through the newly created Asociación de Productores de Películas Independientes. A coalition of filmmakers—among them Fernando Solanas, Rodolfo Kuhn, René Mugica, Humberto Ríos and Alejandro Saderman—met under the banner of the Frente de Liberación del Cine Nacional. Together with INC officials, they drafted an advanced Film Law that proposed a far-reaching restructuring of the industry: greater state intervention in production and exhibition, quotas to guarantee one Argentine film for every six foreign releases, a ticket surcharge to fund new projects, regionalized production circuits, improved technical training, and stronger integration with Latin American markets. The project, endorsed by Isabel Perón in August 1974, was submitted to Congress but soon shelved.

Marilina Ross in La Raulito (1975), directed by Lautaro Murúa.

Meanwhile, industrial production indicators improved. After averaging 29 domestic releases per year between 1955 and 1970, Argentine cinema released 42 features in 1973 and 39–40 in 1974. Attendance also grew sharply, with 1973 showing a 12% increase over the previous year and 1974 reaching 40% higher admissions. Popular audiences, long marginalized from theaters, returned in large numbers. The renewal was reflected in films that combined commercial success with political resonance: Héctor Olivera's La Patagonia rebelde, which denounced the 1921 massacres of striking workers, became a major box-office hit despite opposition from the armed forces; Ricardo Wullicher's Quebracho explored foreign domination in the Littoral; and Lautaro Murúa's La Raulito portrayed the struggles of a marginalized woman. At the same time, filmmakers such as Jorge Prelorán deepened anthropological documentary practices, while younger directors produced works that blurred the line between underground experimentation and political cinema, including Julio Ludueña's La civilización está haciendo masa and Edgardo Cozarinsky's Puntos suspensivos.

The momentum was fragile. Perón's death on 1 July 1974 brought to power María Estela Martínez and José López Rega, who quickly curtailed the reformist initiatives of the previous year. The Triple A intensified repression with threats, bombings and assassinations that drove many artists into exile. In cinema, the change was symbolized by the appointment of Miguel Paulino Tato as interventor of the Ente de Calificación in August 1974. Known as "Señor Tijeras" (transl. Mr. Scissors), Tato reimposed severe restrictions, oversaw the banning of films previously liberated, and remained in his post under the military dictatorship, becoming the most notorious censor in Argentine history. The shelving of the Film Law, the suppression of union activity and the reappearance of systematic censorship marked the end of what had been described as the "Camporist spring".

1976–1983: During the last civic-military dictatorship

From 1975 onward, production fell sharply: 32 features were made in 1975, but only 16 in 1976, with partial recovery to 31 in 1979. The sector shifted toward low-quality comedies, light entertainment and commercial vehicles, while respected directors like Leopoldo Torre Nilsson and Leonardo Favio struggled with censorship or box-office failures. Studios such as Argentina Sono Film closed, Aries reoriented its production to broad commercial comedies, and rising ticket prices narrowed audiences to wealthier urban publics, with neighborhood theaters disappearing. Foreign distributors, particularly U.S. companies, consolidated dominance, recording a 59.9% revenue increase in Argentina between 1977 and 1978. Filmmakers were exiled, disappeared, or killed: Raymundo Gleyzer was abducted in 1976, Enrique Juárez was murdered, and Jorge Cedrón died in exile under suspicious circumstances.

1983–1994: After the return to democracy

Luis Puenzo and Norma Aleandro after receiving the Oscar for Best Foreign Language Film for La historia oficial (1985) at the 58th Academy Awards.

Argentine cinema in exile, although less prolific than the wave made by Chilean filmmakers after the 1973 coup against Salvador Allende, continued in certain respects the militant tradition that the dictatorship at home had shut down. Beyond the two features Jorge Cedrón completed in France, a number of other works were made abroad, many of which were not seen in Argentina until the 1990s and some of which remain unreleased. The principal figures of Grupo Cine Liberación—who had themselves criticized the persistence of armed organizations after 1973—made films that were comparatively distant from day-to-day politics, including La familia Pichilín (Octavio Getino, Peru, 1977), Memorias de un salvaje (Gerardo Vallejo, Spain, 1979) and La mirada de los otros (Fernando Solanas, France, 1980). A branch of Cine de la Base (Jorge Denti, Nerio Barberis) shot in Peru the short Las AAA son las tres armas (1977), inspired by Rodolfo Walsh’s “Open Letter to the Military Junta,” and later filmed in Nicaragua during the Sandinista Revolution; another branch (Álvaro Melián, Jorge Giannoni) finished in Cuba the feature Las vacas sagradas (1977), a chronicle of Argentina’s successive coups from 1955 to 1976 and of middle-class responses to them, before completing in Italy the short Persistir es vencer (1978), in the militant vein of Cedrón’s Resistir but from the PRT-ERP’s perspective, with interviews with Enrique Gorriarán Merlo and Luis Mattini. Humberto Ríos, who had concluded in Argentina the documentary Al grito de este pueblo (1972) on Bolivia’s political process, made several films during his Mexican exile; the most notable, Una voz entre muchas (1978), recorded one of the earliest testimonies by a survivor of Argentina’s clandestine detention centers. Rodolfo Kuhn lived and worked in Germany and then in Spain, where he directed the documentary Todo es ausencia (1984) on the Mothers of Plaza de Mayo and adapted Eduardo Pavlovsky’s play as El señor Galíndez (1984); he died in Mexico in 1987 at the home of writer Miguel Bonasso on the day they finished the screenplay adapted from Bonasso’s Recuerdos de la muerte.

Within Argentina, several films began to break the prevailing “metaphor of confinement” by positing journeys or passages that implied personal transformation. La conquista del paraíso (1981) by Eliseo Subiela—who had informally belonged to the 1960s generation with the shorts Un largo silencio (1963) and Sobre todas estas estrellas (1965), and had also taken part in clandestine militant cinema with Didáctico sobre las armas del pueblo—offered an early route out. Another early sign was Queridas amigas (1980), the overlooked but sensitive debut of Carlos Orgambide, in which the stifling routine of two women is relieved through the intervention of a third, a trip north, and a birth. More indirectly, De la misteriosa Buenos Aires (Alberto Fischerman, Ricardo Wullicher, and Oscar Barney Finn, 1981) went to the past through three tales by Manuel Mujica Láinez to echo themes resonant in the present. The allegory that most explicitly cancels the “confinement” period is Los enemigos (Eduardo Calcagno, 1983), written by Alan Pauls from a concept by the director, which in almost expressionist terms opposes a youthful, free, uninhibited outside to a decrepit, endogamous, violent inside. In 1981 the censors barred María Luisa Bemberg from casting Víctor Laplace in her debut Momentos but permitted the film’s depiction of female-initiated adultery—largely absent from earlier Argentine cinema—which she pursued, with variations, in Señora de nadie (1982). The embrace of the dictatorship’s economic policies by Buenos Aires’s middle class, and the ensuing collapse, provided the subject of the black comedy Plata dulce (Fernando Ayala, 1982), written by Oscar Viale and Jorge Goldenberg, one of Aries’s first major hits not tied to picaresque comedy; Ayala emerged from a long lull with that film and especially El arreglo (1983), about one man’s stubborn resistance to quotidian corruption, scripted by Roberto Cossa and Carlos Somigliana.

In 1983—an election year culminating in October and the end of the dictatorship—cinema also reckoned with the past through diverse formal strategies but similar political vectors, notably anti-Peronist ones. The documentary La república perdida (Miguel Pérez, 1983), which Claudio España later described as conceived “from Radicalism,” contributed to the campaign that brought Raúl Alfonsín to power. The same role was played by No habrá más penas ni olvido (Héctor Olivera, 1983), adapted by Roberto Cossa from Osvaldo Soriano’s novel, which pits right- and left-wing Peronists in an archetypal provincial town; Olivera’s taste for mordant humor found an ideal vehicle in a plot that begins lightly and descends into tragedy, provoking irritation among Peronists while effectively staging the movement’s contradictions. That year Juan José Jusid returned with Espérame mucho, another backward look, more intimate and autobiographical, and among the last Argentine films censored. Around the same time, Emilio Vieyra rushed to capitalize on new libertarian winds with El poder de la censura (1983), a comedy publicized with Reina Reech emerging more or less nude from an eggshell on the poster.

Parallel dissident voices became visible outside commercial circuits in a prolific underground made in 16 mm and Super-8 for cine-clubs, special screenings, or ad-hoc festivals, notably the annual UNCIPAR, which became a significant space of resistance. These short-film makers called themselves “independents,” a term later overused by critics; although they accompanied the mobilizations and euphoria of the democratic transition, most remained marginalized by the National Film Institute’s policies. A key emergence in this zone was Cine Testimonio (founded in 1982 by Tristán Bauer, Laura Búa, Silvia Chanvillard, and Alberto Giudici, later joined by Víctor Benítez, Marcelo Céspedes, and Mario Piazza), whose heterogeneous output ranged from Bauer and Chanvillard’s works close to Jorge Preloran’s ethnographic practice (Martín Choque, 1982; Ni tan blancos ni tan indios, 1984), to Giudici’s departure from conventional anthropological structures in Causachum Cusco (1982), and Céspedes’s urban inflection of Fernando Birri’s foundational proposals in Los totos (1982). Produced without official support and circulated via alternative channels—such as the 1985 program “De este pueblo” curated by Octavio Fabiano at Buenos Aires’s Cine Arte—the collective dissolved as members’ interests diverged.

With Raúl Alfonsín’s inauguration in December 1983, the director Manuel Antin was appointed to head the National Film Institute; among his first measures was the anticipated abolition of censorship. The historian and critic Jorge Miguel Couselo became the last interventor at the Ratings Board while Antin moved swiftly in Congress to repeal its founding law and replace it with a system of age restrictions that, with variations, remains in force. Abolishing censorship ratified rather than inaugurated a cultural opening already in progress, and the newfound license to “say and show everything” quickly yielded more explicit sex and violence—through picaresque comedies and sadistic thrillers—much as a decade earlier. Emilio Vieyra contributed Sucedió en el internado (1985) and especially Correccional de mujeres (1986), which cemented Edda Bustamante’s brief fame as a sex symbol; Carlos Borcosque Jr. pushed the genre to delirious extremes with Las esclavas (1987), while Juan Carlos Desanzo offered more sober thrillers, notably En retirada (1984), co-written with José Pablo Feinmann and Santiago Carlos Oves, a plausible portrait of the dictatorship’s “unemployed workforce,” a euphemism for former death-squad operatives. Standout entries came from two veterans of the 1960s generation: Lautaro Murúa’s Cuarteles de invierno (1984), from Osvaldo Soriano’s novel, achieved a rare, dense noir atmosphere; José Martínez Suárez’s Noches sin lunas ni soles (1984), from Rubén Tizziani’s novel, folded together his recurring motifs—classical cinema, male friendship, the city, anarchism. Both filmmakers closed their careers with these films.

Antin’s tenure emphasized broad dissemination—retrospectives, contemporary programs, international awards—but was constrained by the same economic pressures that precipitated Alfonsín’s early exit in 1989; nor did the period introduce a production or exhibition paradigm shift, aside from isolated professional uses of 16 mm. In 1987 Homero Alsina Thevenet argued for industrial reconversion—Super-16 adoption, smaller theaters, and, crucially, television investment, common in Spain, Italy, and France but absent in Argentina. In 1995 Sergio Wolf questioned why, despite the opportunity, no chain of national-cinema theaters had materialized, leaving films to fight exhibitors for minimal screen time. Antin supported a few under-thirty directors (Gustavo Mosquera, Christian Pauls), yet the decade mostly allowed a now-mature generation—silenced by the dictatorship—to update its work; thematic freedom frequently favored allegory and indirection over direct engagement with the recent past. Some of the period’s best films followed this “indirect” line: Los insomnes (Carlos Orgambide, 1984), Hay unos tipos abajo (Rafael Filippelli and Emilio Alfaro, 1985), Malayunta (José Santiso, 1986), and El dueño del sol (Rodolfo Mórtola, 1987). Others addressed the past by returning to earlier eras, as in Debajo del mundo (Juan B. Stagnaro and Beda Docampo Feijóo, 1987) and, conspicuously, Camila (María Luisa Bemberg, 1984), a period melodrama that became the decade’s biggest commercial hit and received an Academy Award nomination. Luis Puenzo’s La historia oficial (1985), written with Aída Bortnik, framed a history teacher’s belated moral awakening as she suspects her adopted daughter may be the child of “disappeared” parents; by offering access to “knowledge” and a tempered redemption, the film facilitated recognition without provoking a deeper debate about civil responsibility, while the state addressed military accountability. The contemporaneous “two demons” theory encouraged representational vagueness, portraying victims as “idealists” who “thought differently,” while explicit affiliations with leftist organizations remained quasi-criminalized; numerous films treated “memories,” fewer worked critically with memory in the stronger sense.

More direct treatments appeared around the Falklands/Malvinas War and exile. Los chicos de la guerra (Bebe Kamin, 1984), from Daniel Kon’s novel, adopted a generational portrait of conscripted youths, a necessarily episodic structure that enabled an intimate accounting of the conflict’s consequences. El rigor del destino (1985) marked Gerardo Vallejo’s return from exile, alternating past and present through the bond between a young man and his grandfather (Carlos Carella), and reconnecting his protagonists with their landscape in a vein of emotional Peronism. Alberto Fischerman’s Los días de junio (1985) drew on exile and Malvinas as points of departure for a lucid overcoming of the past through intimate ties, articulated—per critic Gustavo Cabrera—with an “intense awareness of physical expression” that countered the period’s talkative excesses; Fischerman then oscillated between experimental 16 mm (Gombrowicz o la seducción) and comedies like La clínica del doctor Cureta (1987) and Las puertitas del señor López (1988). The most explicit mainstream film on recent repression was La noche de los lápices (1986), produced by Aries, even as the company continued degraded comedies and exploitation ventures (Pasajeros de una pesadilla, 1984; collaborations linked to Roger Corman). Héctor Olivera proceeded cannily—drawing on María Seoane and Héctor Ruiz Núñez’s book, involving survivor Pablo Díaz, and facilitating the collective short Memoria y homenaje—and later remarked that he made the film because “the left wasn’t making it”; its unadorned directness proved potent in theaters and on television, shaping awareness among viewers who had never approached Nunca más.

Fernando Solanas’s delayed Los hijos de Fierro reached only a small audience in April 1984, but its time-capsule nature was striking: while much of Argentine cinema addressed the past obliquely, Solanas offered an epic rereading of Peronism through Martín Fierro, condensing the turbulence of 1972–1975—early repression, killings, exiles—while recalling the formal and narrative inquiries truncated by the dictatorship. He updated those themes while retaining expressive heterogeneity in two complementary films: El exilio de Gardel (1986) and Sur (1988). Broadly, the former speaks to those who left and the latter to those who stayed, but both expand into frescoes where history, politics, and identity are pursued through open, poetic reflection; consistent with his earlier work, Solanas rejects conventional narrative models to seek forms adequate to dispersed, heterogeneous realities, reviving FORJA’s political ideas and Homero Manzi’s aesthetic strategies, appropriating historical figures and popular myths to interpret the present, and folding a younger generation’s skepticism toward parental choices into the films’ own forward-looking energies.

Away from political urgencies, Alejandro Doria and Eliseo Subiela made emblematic popular successes. Doria pivoted from allegory (La isla, Los miedos) to realist drama in Darse cuenta (1984), about a doctor’s obsessive effort to save a terminal patient, and followed with the blockbuster Esperando la carroza (1985), from Jacobo Langsner’s play, a paradigmatic aggiornamento of the grotesque whose lines and characters entered popular culture and inspired later attempts in the genre. Subiela’s second feature, Hombre mirando al sudeste (1987), staged a metaphysical mystery around a psychiatric patient whose intelligence unsettles his doctor; beneath its web of references, the film—like Darse cuenta—urged solidarity at society’s margins, extending concerns already present in Un largo silencio two decades earlier at the same hospital, now reframed by the figure of a doctor as the spectator’s point of view.

Antin’s administration encouraged many debuts, but the deepening crisis at the Institute and in the national economy imperiled continuity, reinforcing the “one-off debut” syndrome already seen among some 1960s filmmakers. The resulting films, heterogeneous and often personal, offer intense documentation of the decade. Beyond allegories like Malayunta and El dueño del sol, several works restored omitted subjects to representation. Marginality—concealed by the dictatorship during the 1978 World Cup—surfaced in documentaries and in Teo Kofman’s Perros de la noche (1986), from Enrique Medina’s novel, pioneering a non-paternalist approach and extensive work with non-professional actors. Américo Ortiz de Zárate’s Otra historia de amor (1986) surpassed the more popular Adiós, Roberto (Enrique Dawi, 1985) in depicting a relationship between two men; as writer Ricardo Rodríguez Pereyra notes, its most transgressive gesture was to shape protagonists outside stock “effeminate” or “camp” archetypes, and its happy ending was later altered for television against the director’s protests. A kin yet more enigmatic debut, Víctor Dínenzon’s Abierto de 18 a 24 (1988), went largely unnoticed amid the economic turmoil that culminated months later in hyperinflation. The ever-fragile possibility of cinema beyond porteño parameters gained a brief impulse with La deuda interna (1988), a success paradoxically enabled by a British coproduction only six years after the Falklands War; Jujuy-born Miguel Pereira, trained in London, gave the landscape a protagonist’s weight and restored the expressive value of silence in a particularly verbose decade.

The decade’s most acclaimed fiction, La película del rey (1986), is a definitive “film-about-filmmaking” and a study in the material difficulty, necessary madness, and seductive self-destruction of production. Carlos Sorín’s debut—after long experience in cinematography and advertising—spirals as the effort to film the story of Orélie-Antoine de Tounens, the self-proclaimed “King of Patagonia,” abandons initial corporate safety and disintegrates into improvised strategies; Sorín and Jorge Goldenberg’s original script resists romanticization, grounding the protagonists in the original nobility of their subject, the absence of a national epic, and a paradigmatic North-American reference. Alternating the filming process with the footage obtained—beginning in epic and ending in delirious abstraction—the film mirrors the project’s own dissolution. Its mise-en-abyme extends to its conception, inspired by a 1972 attempt by designer Juan Fresán and Goldenberg (with Sorín as cinematographer) to tell the same story, and even earlier to Alberto Yaccelini’s Single (Un ejercicio incompleto) (c. 1967), a film about failing to make a film; Yaccelini later edited La película del rey. A literary variant of this recursion appears in Christian Pauls’s debut Sinfín (La muerte no es ninguna solución), co-written with his brother Alan, about filming an adaptation of Julio Cortázar’s “Casa tomada,” itself the subject of a special edition designed by Fresán; their father Axel Harding served as executive producer on La película del rey.

Provocation found its foremost exponent in Jorge Polaco, who forged a scandal-aesthetic across three extraordinary films—Margotita (Super-8, 1984), Diapasón (1986), and En el nombre del hijo (1987)—often around the figure of Margot Moreyra. Marked by ritual, deliberate confusions between the real and the imagined, and endogamous enclosures that culminate in decomposition, these works were read as a post-dictatorship exorcism akin to the expressionist shadows born in interwar Germany; Polaco’s later output proved more erratic. Painter and short-filmmaker Jorge Acha built a briefer, coherent, and largely hidden oeuvre in total independence, combining mordant humor with a radical sensorium; Habeas corpus (1987) and Standard (1989) culminate in Mburucuyá (completed posthumously, 1994), with Habeas corpus—as scholar Ricardo Parodi argued—constituting perhaps the national cinema’s most probing exploration of a tortured body’s fragmentary perceptions and powers.

Amid the 1989 economic collapse, two Argentines based in France returned to shoot in the country at producer Jorge Estrada Mora’s invitation: Edgardo Cozarinsky with Guerreros y cautivas and Eduardo de Gregorio with Cuerpos perdidos, a romantically charged tale of parallel loves separated by time; both premiered domestically in 1994 to limited response. Also that year came the Argentine release of Las veredas de Saturno (Les trottoirs de Saturne, 1986), a French production spiritually Argentine, in which Hugo Santiago—with Juan José Saer, Ricardo Aronovich, and musician-turned-actor Rodolfo Mederos—revisited the Invasión universe, abstracting explicit referents (Buenos Aires, the exile of bandoneonist “Tata” Cedrón, the unresolved death of his brother Jorge in Paris) into a singular mythic purity that mirrored the act of transporting fragments of porteño memory to their “symmetric” city, Paris.

Documentary production featured major contributions from women-led initiatives and independent groups. Sculptor Ana Montes de González, a specialist in popular crafts, moved from that field to what she called “committed anthropology,” first researching key 1960s documentaries (Quilino, Ocurrido en Hualfín) and then directing Los onas: vida y muerte en Tierra del Fuego (1977), one of Argentina’s most valuable yet least seen documentaries; she completed Las tejedoras de ñandutí (1988) and began a third project on Alicia Moreau de Justo before her death in 1990. Silvia Chanvillard and Laura Búa formed Cine Testimonio Mujer, making the mid-length films Solas o mal acompañadas (1988) and No sé por qué te quiero tanto (1992). More enduring was Cine Ojo (Carmen Guarini, Marcelo Céspedes), active in production and diffusion, with indispensable titles such as Hospital Borda (1986)—rejected by state television as “audiences are not mature enough to see it”—Crónicas villeras (1988), and La noche eterna (1991) on Río Turbio coal miners. Carlos Echeverría emerged as the period’s leading documentarian with Cuarentena (1983), accompanying writer Osvaldo Bayer’s homecoming during the electoral campaign and already displaying a talent for paradox and cinematic structuring, and with Juan: como si nada hubiera sucedido (1987), an investigation into the sole disappeared person from Bariloche that reconstructs a face, a voice, and—through objects, traces, witnesses, and the inclusion of hesitations and silences—the mesh of military, political, and economic interests that sustained the dictatorship; refusing resignation, the film broke the informal pact of impunity, condemned the Due Obedience and Full Stop laws in real time, and, despite limited circulation and meager institutional support, became the decade’s most influential documentary.

A signal of fiction’s renewal arrived with Alejandro Agresti’s El amor es una mujer gorda (1988), which, amid “obediencia debida” and “punto final,” insisted on interrogating the past through a protagonist who obsessively searches for his disappeared girlfriend; Boda secreta (1989) inverted the premise—an ex-guerrilla returns and discovers his girlfriend cannot recognize him. Agresti’s work reasserted the cinematic necessity of political explicitness against a tide of vagueness, restored a vital sense of form to a cinema burdened by unadventurous naturalism, and demonstrated the possibility of sustained authorship through relentless production despite economic crisis, union constraints, and institutional resistance.

Festivals

A screening of the Buenos Aires International Festival of Independent Cinema (BAFICI) at Teatro San Martín, 2009.

Awards

View of the first Argentine Academy Awards in 1942, with Orson Welles, Enrique Muiño, Delia Garcés, María Duval, Mirtha Legrand, Mario Soffici, Luis Saslavsky, Francisco Múgica and Sebastián Chiola in the crowd.

The Silver Condor Awards, presented annually by the Argentine Film Critics Association, are the most important film awards in the country.

See also

• The 100 Greatest Films of Argentine Cinema
• Latin American cinema
• Lists of Argentine films
• List of Argentine submissions for the Academy Award for Best International Feature Film
• List of Argentine Academy Award winners and nominees

Bibliography

• Di Núbila, Domingo (1998). La época de oro. Historia del cine argentino I (in Spanish). Buenos Aires: Ediciones del Jilguero. ISBN 978-987-957-865-0.
• Feldman, Simón (1990). La generación del 60 (PDF) (in Spanish). Buenos Aires: Instituto Nacional de Cinematografía; Ediciones Culturales Argentinas; Editorial Legasa. Retrieved 3 November 2024.
• Finkielman, Jorge (2004). The Film Industry in Argentina: An Illustrated Cultural History. McFarland & Company, Inc. ISBN 978-078-641-628-8. Retrieved 12 November 2022 – via the Internet Archive.
• Getino, Octavio (2005). Cine argentino: entre lo posible y lo deseable (in Spanish). Buenos Aires: Ediciones CICCUS. ISBN 978-987-935-524-4. Retrieved 12 November 2022 – via Red de Historia de los Medios (ReHiMe) on Issuu.
• Karush, Matthew B. (2012). Culture of Class: Radio and Cinema in the Making of a Divided Argentina, 1920–1946. Duke University Press. ISBN 978-082-235-264-8. Retrieved 12 November 2022 – via Google Books.
• Mafud, Lucio (2016). La imagen ausente. El cine mudo argentino en publicaciones gráficas. Catálogo. El cine de ficción (1914-1923). Investigaciones de la Biblioteca Nacional (in Spanish). Buenos Aires: Biblioteca Nacional; Editorial Teseo. ISBN 978-987-723-096-3.
• Mahieu, José Agustín (1966). Breve historia del cine argentino (in Spanish). Buenos Aires: Editorial Universitaria de Buenos Aires.
• Manetti, Ricardo; Rodríguez Riva, Lucía, eds. (2014). 30-50-70. Conformación, crisis y renovación del cine industrial argentino y latinoamericano (PDF) (in Spanish). Buenos Aires: Editorial de la Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Universidad de Buenos Aires. ISBN 978-987-361-714-0. Retrieved 6 November 2022.
• Maranghello, César (2005). Breve historia del cine argentino (in Spanish). Buenos Aires: Laertes. ISBN 978-847-584-532-6.
• Peña, Fernando Martín (2012). Cien años de cine argentino (eBook) (in Spanish). Buenos Aires: Editorial Biblos. ISBN 978-987-691-098-9.
• Rist, Peter H. (2014). Historical Dictionary of South American Cinema. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-081-088-036-8. Retrieved 6 November 2022 – via Google Books.
• Schumann, Peter B. (1987). Historia del cine latinoamericano (in Spanish). Buenos Aires: Legasa. ISBN 978-950-600-099-8.

Further reading

• Berardi, Mario (2006). La vida imaginada: vida cotidiana y cine argentino (in Spanish). Buenos Aires: Ediciones del Jilguero. ISBN 987-9416-09-0. Retrieved 18 December 2022 – via the Internet Archive.
• España, Claudio, ed. (2000). Cine argentino: industria y clasicismo, 1933-1956 (in Spanish). Vol. 1. Buenos Aires: Fondo Nacional de las Artes. ISBN 978-950-980-759-4.
• España, Claudio, ed. (2005). Cine argentino: modernidad y vanguardias, 1957-1983 (in Spanish). Vol. 1. Buenos Aires: Fondo Nacional de las Artes. ISBN 978-950-980-788-4.
• Fabbro, Gabriela (2024). Lumiton. El sello que marcó el rumbo del cine nacional (in Spanish). Vicente López: Archivo Lumiton. ISBN 978-987-261-511-6. Retrieved 9 February 2025.
• Kriger, Clara, ed. (2018). Imágenes y públicos del cine argentino clásico (PDF) (in Spanish). Tandil: Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. ISBN 978-950-658-454-2. Retrieved 26 December 2022.
• Lescano, Victoria (2021). Prueba de vestuario: diseñadores y vestuaristas en el cine argentino (in Spanish). Buenos Aires: Ampersand. ISBN 978-987-416-162-8.
• Lusnich, Ana Laura (2007). El drama social folclórico. El universo rural en el cine argentino (in Spanish). Prologue by Claudio España. Buenos Aires: Editorial Biblos. ISBN 978-950-786-613-5. Retrieved 17 November 2022 – via the Internet Archive.
• Melo, Adrián, ed. (2008). Otras historias de amor: gays, lesbianas y travestis en el cine argentino (in Spanish). Buenos Aires: Ediciones Lea. ISBN 978-987-634-052-6.
• Peña, Fernando Martín, ed. (2024). Cine argentino: hechos, gente, películas. 1896-1958 (in Spanish). Buenos Aires: Luz Fernández Ediciones. ISBN 978-631-00-4792-8.
• Peña, Fernando Martín, ed. (2024). Cine argentino: hechos, gente, películas. 1959-2024 (in Spanish). Buenos Aires: Luz Fernández Ediciones. ISBN 978-631-00-4915-1.
• Schroeder Rodríguez, Paul A. (2016). Latin American Cinema: A Comparative History. University of California Press. ISBN 978-052-096-353-5. Retrieved 18 November 2022 – via JSTOR.
• Wolf, Sergio, ed. (1994). Cine argentino. La otra historia (in Spanish). Buenos Aires: Ediciones Letra Buena. ISBN 950-777-048-8.

External links

• Media related to the cinema of Argentina at Wikimedia Commons
• INCAA (in Spanish), official website of the National Institute of Cinema and Audiovisual Arts.