Remediation in Community Colleges

edit

Remediation, or sometimes referred to as developmental education, is a format of education aimed to help open doors for students by reinforcing or re-teaching them core skills. This educational strategy is utilized so students can meet competencies in various academic arenas and further progress in their academics. Remediation is prominent in community colleges, a type of two-year colleges, as these institutions are designed to accommodate students of various levels of academic abilities. Community college students are placed into remedial coursework according to their performance on placement-based testing they take prior to beginning classes.

Assignment to Remediation

edit

The push in shifting students to enroll in remedial courses at community colleges stems from philosophical beliefs and reputations that these are the most appropriate places for instruction.[1][2] All community colleges have developmental or remedial courses of some kind.[2][3] Around 42 percent of first-year students attending two-year colleges in the United States sign up for remedial courses, twice as many as those at four-year universities or colleges.[4] In Ohio, four in ten traditional-age students at community colleges enroll in remedial English courses, whereas six in ten enroll in remedial math.[2] This state example reflects national studies that show a higher need for remedial community college students to take math courses, which also often have bigger class sizes and more levels of coursework than their remedial reading and writing counterpart courses.[5] Students start taking remedial coursework in community colleges according to their performance on college placement tests, considered by some scholars to be far from perfect in their designs.[6] Community colleges possess few admission requirements, meaning these types of institutions see a higher number of remedial students.[7] Remedial education within community colleges may exist within an academic department, in its own academic department, or in an entire academic unit of its own.[5]

Successful Approaches to Remediation

edit

Scholars recommend that community colleges can enhance their remedial education programs through utilizing a variety of methods. Community colleges are suggested to allow students to have the option of taking other courses, in addition to remedial courses, so they may feel like they are making progress with their programs.[8] The institution of learning communities at community colleges may be challenging due to the nature of these students coming to and leaving campus often, but they have been helpful for remedial students at other postsecondary educations in facilitating friendships, improved studying patterns, and higher rates of passing courses.[1][9] Technology-enhanced classrooms, complete with SmartBoards, computers and online networks, can increase the level of motivation that remedial community college students place toward their academic work[10]. Remedial students obtaining academic assistance via college writing centers can also be helpful for enhancing their skills, as well as observing the interdisciplinary nature of classroom concepts and learning strategies.[4][11]

Positives of Remediation

edit

Effective and passionate instructors can provide remedial students with social capital, leading them to services ranging from tutoring and counseling.[4] Students in remedial courses often end of performing “better than college-prepared students in terms of their grade point average, retention, and program completion.”[3] Remedial students who attend community college orientations and receive more contact with tutoring, advising and mentoring services find these options to be rewarding.[5] Those who complete remedial courses before college level courses often experience more benefits, including higher grade point averages, compared to their counterparts who do not take these remedial courses early in their college careers.[12]

Negatives and Criticisms of Remediation

edit

Some students are placed into remedial courses, even when they only have minor issues, leading them to need to pass and complete remedial courses before being able to enroll in a basic course for that subject area.[2][1] Likewise, some students are restricted from taking classes in other disciplines, such as physical sciences, until they complete developmental sequences.[13] Students who take remedial courses may not have these count as college credits, and these students may be more likely to complete fewer college credits overall or stop out of college.[2][8] Many community college instructors of remedial courses are part-time faculty members, which can prove challenging to students who require more assistance and contact.[7][5] While some scholars debate whether money should be allocated toward remedial education, opponents argue that withholding these opportunities also has a direct impact on the quality of employees in the workforce if they continue to lack essential skills.[3]

  1. ^ a b c Tinto, Vincent. "Learning communities and the reconstruction of remedial education in higher education" (PDF). Paper presented at the Conference of Replacing Remediation in Higher Education at Stanford University.
  2. ^ a b c d e Bettinger, Eric; Long, Bridget (2005). "Remediation at the community college: Student participation and outcomes". New Directions for Community Colleges. 129.
  3. ^ a b c McMillan, Virginia; Parke, Scott; Lanning, Carol (1997). "Remedial/developmental education approaches for the current community college environment". New Directions for Community Colleges. 100.
  4. ^ a b c Callahan, M. Kate; Chumney, Donalda (2009). ""Write like college": How remedial writing courses at a community college and a research university position "at- risk" students in the field of higher education" (PDF). Teachers College Record. 111 (7).
  5. ^ a b c d Shults, Christopher. "Remedial education: Practices and policies in community colleges (Research brief)". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  6. ^ Southard, Anne; Clay, Jennifer (2004). "Measuring the effectiveness of developmental writing courses". Community College Review. 32 (2).
  7. ^ a b Cohen, Arthur; Brawer, Florence; Kisker, Carrie (2013). The American community college (Sixth edition. ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. ISBN 9781118449813.
  8. ^ a b Zeitlin, Arthur N.; Markus, Theodore C. (1996). "Should remediation be mandatory in the community college?". Community Review. 14. {{cite journal}}: line feed character in |title= at position 40 (help)
  9. ^ McArthur, Ronald C. (2005). "Faculty -- based advising: An important factor in community college retention". Community College Review. 32 (4). {{cite journal}}: line feed character in |title= at position 61 (help)
  10. ^ David, Denise L.; Keaton, Rebekah; Morris, Robert; Murphy, James G.; Stapley, Ian (2008). "A space for writing: Developmental writing instruction in a technology-enhanced classroom". Research & Teaching in Developmental Education. 24 (2).
  11. ^ Boquet, Elizabeth H. (1999). ""Our little secret": A history of writing centers, pre- to post-open admissions". College Composition and Communication. 50 (3).
  12. ^ Crews, Denise M.; Aragon, Steven R. (2004). "Influence of a community college developmental education writing course on academic performance". Community College Review. 32 (2).
  13. ^ VanOra, Jason (2012). "The experience of community college for developmental students: challenges and motivations". Community College Enterprise.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)