The quantum electrodynamic vacuum or QED vacuum is the field-theoretic vacuum of quantum electrodynamics. It is the lowest energy state (the ground state) of the electromagnetic field when the fields are quantized.[1] When Planck's constant is hypothetically allowed to approach zero, QED vacuum is converted to classical vacuum, which is to say, the vacuum of classical electromagnetism.[2][3]
Another field-theoretic vacuum is the QCD vacuum of the Standard Model.
Fluctutations
editThe QED vacuum is subject to fluctuations about a dormant zero average-field condition:[4] Here is a description of the quantum vacuum:[5]
“The quantum theory asserts that a vacuum, even the most perfect vacuum devoid of any matter, is not really empty. Rather the quantum vacuum can be depicted as a sea of continuously appearing and disappearing [pairs of] particles that manifest themselves in the apparent jostling of particles that is quite distinct form their thermal motions. These particles are ‘virtual’, as opposed to real, particles. ...At any given instant, the vacuum is full of such virtual pairs, which leave their signature behind, by affecting the energy levels of atoms.”
-Joseph Silk On the shores of the unknown, p. 62
Virtual particles
editIt is sometimes attempted to provide an intuitive picture of virtual particles based upon the Heisenberg energy-time uncertainty principle:
(with ΔE and Δt energy and time variations, and ℏ the Planck constant divided by 2π) arguing along the lines that the short lifetime of virtual particles allows the "borrowing" of large energies from the vacuum and thus permits particle generation for short times.[6]
This interpretation of the energy-time uncertainty relation is not universally accepted, however.[7][8] One issue is the use of an uncertainty relation limiting measurement accuracy as though a time uncertainty Δt determines a "budget" for borrowing energy ΔE. Another issue is the meaning of "time" in this relation, because energy and time (unlike position q and momentum p, for example) do not satisfy a canonical commutation relation (such as [q, p ] = iℏ) .[9] Various schemes have been advanced to construct an observable that has some kind of time interpretation, and yet does satisfy a canonical commutation relation with energy.[10][11] The very many approaches to the energy-time uncertainty principle are a long and continuing subject.[11]
Quantization of the fields
editThe Heisenberg uncertainty principle does not allow a particle to exist in a state in which the particle is simultaneously at a fixed location, say the origin of coordinates, and has also zero momentum. Instead the particle has a range of momentum and spread in location attributable to quantum fluctuations; if confined, it has a zero-point energy.[12]
An uncertainty principle applies to all quantum mechanical operators that do not commute.[13] In particular, it applies also to the electromagnetic field. A digression follows to flesh out the role of commutators for the electromagnetic field.[14]
| The standard approach to the quantization of the electromagnetic field begins by introducing a vector potential A and a scalar potential V to represent the basic electromagnetic electric field E and magnetic field B using the relations:[14]
The vector potential is not completely determined by these relations, leaving open a so-called gauge freedom. Resolving this ambiguity using the Coulomb gauge leads to a description of the electromagnetic fields in the absence of charges in terms of the vector potential and the momentum field Π, given by: where ε0 is the electric constant of the SI units. Quantization is achieved by insisting that the momentum field and the vector potential do not commute. |
Because of the non-commutation of field variables, the variances of the fields cannot be zero, although their averages are zero.[15] The electromagnetic field has therefore a zero-point energy, and a lowest quantum state. The interaction of an excited atom with this lowest quantum state of the electromagnetic field is what leads to spontaneous emission, the transition of an excited atom to a state of lower energy by emission of a photon even when no external perturbation of the atom is present.[16]
Electromagnetic properties
editAs a result of quantization, the quantum electrodynamic vacuum can be considered as a dielectric medium, and is capable of vacuum polarization.[17] In particular, the force law between charged particles is affected.[18] The electrical permittivity of quantum electrodynamic vacuum can be calculated, and it differs slightly from the simple ε0 of the classical vacuum. Likewise, its permeability can be calculated and differs slightly from μ0. This medium is a dielectric with relative dielectric constant > 1, and is diamagnetic, with relative magnetic permeability < 1.[19] Under some extreme circumstances (for example, in the very high fields found in the exterior regions of pulsars[20]), the quantum electrodynamic vacuum is thought to exhibit nonlinearity in the fields.[21] Calculations also indicate birefringence and dichroism at high fields.[22]
Attainability
editA perfect vacuum is itself only attainable in principle.[23][24] It is an idealization, like absolute zero for temperature, that can be approached, but never actually realized:[23]
“One reason [a vacuum is not empty] is that the walls of a vacuum chamber emit light in the form of black-body radiation...If this soup of photons is in thermodynamic equilibrium with the walls, it can be said to have a particular temperature, as well as a pressure. Another reason that perfect vacuum is impossible is the Heisenberg uncertainty principle which states that no particles can ever have an exact position ...Each atom exists as a probability function of space, which has a certain nonzero value everywhere in a given volume. ...More fundamentally, quantum mechanics predicts ...a correction to the energy called the zero-point energy [that] consists of energies of virtual particles that have a brief existence. This is called vacuum fluctuation.”
|
The inability to obtain a perfect vacuum leaves open the question of attainability of a quantum electrodynamic vacuum or QED vacuum. Predictions of QED vacuum such as spontaneous emission, the Casimir effect and the Lamb shift have been experimentally verified, suggesting QED vacuum is a good model for realizable vacuum. There are competing theoretical models for vacuum, however. For example, quantum chromodynamic vacuum includes many virtual particles not treated in quantum electrodynamics. The vacuum of quantum gravity treats gravitational effects not included in the Standard Model. It remains an open question whether further refinements in experimental technique ultimately will support another model for realizable vacuum.
References
edit- ^
Tian Yu Cao (2004). Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Field Theory. Cambridge University Press. p. 179. ISBN 0521602726.
For each stationary classical background field there is a ground state of the associated quantized field. This is the vacuum for that background.
- ^ Tom G. Mackay, Akhlesh Lakhtakia (2010). Electromagnetic anisotropy and bianisotropy: a field guide. World Scientific. p. 201. ISBN 9814289612.
- ^ Classical vacuum is not a material medium, but a reference state used to define the SI units. Its permittivity is the electric constant and its permeability is the magnetic constant, both of which are exactly known by definition, and are not measured properties. See Mackay, p. 20, footnote 6.
- ^
Ramamurti Shankar (1994). Principles of quantum mechanics (2nd ed. ed.). Springer. p. 507. ISBN 0306447908.
{{cite book}}:|edition=has extra text (help) - ^ Joseph Silk (2005). On the shores of the unknown: a short history of the universe. Cambridge University Press. p. 62. ISBN 0521836271.
- ^ For an example, see P. C. W. Davies (1982). The accidental universe. Cambridge University Press. p. 106. ISBN 0521286921.
- ^
A vaguer description is provided by Jonathan Allday (2002). Quarks, leptons and the big bang (2nd ed ed.). CRC Press. pp. 224 ff. ISBN 0750308060.
The interaction will last for a certain duration Δt. This implies that the amplitude for the total energy involved in the interaction is spread over a range of energies ΔE.
{{cite book}}:|edition=has extra text (help) - ^ This "borrowing" idea has led to proposals for using the zero-point energy of vacuum as an infinite reservoir and a variety of "camps" about this interpretation. See, for example, Moray B. King (2001). Quest for zero point energy: engineering principles for 'free energy' inventions. Adventures Unlimited Press. pp. 124 ff. ISBN 0932813941.
- ^
Quantities satisfying a canonical commutation rule are said to be noncompatible observables, by which is meant that they can both be measured simultaneously only with limited precision. See Kiyosi Itô (1993). "§ 351 (XX.23) C: Canonical commutation relations". Encyclopedic dictionary of mathematics (2nd ed ed.). MIT Press. p. 1303. ISBN 0262590204.
{{cite book}}:|edition=has extra text (help) - ^
Paul Busch, Marian Grabowski, Pekka J. Lahti (1995). "§III.4: Energy and time". Operational quantum physics. Springer. pp. 77 ff. ISBN 3540593586.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ a b
For a review, see Paul Busch (2008). "Chapter 3: The Time–Energy Uncertainty Relation". In J.G. Muga, R. Sala Mayato and Í.L. Egusquiza, editors (ed.). Time in Quantum Mechanics (2nd ed ed.). Springer. pp. 73 ff. ISBN 3540734724.
{{cite book}}:|edition=has extra text (help);|editor=has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list (link) - ^
Franz Schwabl (2007). "§ 3.1.3: The zero-point energy". Quantum mechanics (4rth ed. ed.). Springer. p. 54. ISBN 3540719326.
{{cite book}}:|edition=has extra text (help) - ^ Peter Lambropoulos, David Petrosyan (2007). Fundamentals of quantum optics and quantum information. Springer. p. 30. ISBN 354034571X.
- ^ a b
Werner Vogel, Dirk-Gunnar Welsch (2006). "Chapter 2: Elements of quantum electrodynamics". Quantum optics (3rd ed. ed.). Wiley-VCH. pp. 18 ff. ISBN 3527405070.
{{cite book}}:|edition=has extra text (help) - ^
Gilbert Grynberg, Alain Aspect, Claude Fabre (2010). Introduction to Quantum Optics: From the Semi-classical Approach to Quantized Light. Cambridge University Press. pp. 351 ff. ISBN 0521551129.
{{cite book}}: Text "§5.2.2 Vacuum fluctuations and their physical consequences" ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Ian Parker (2003). Biophotonics, Volume 360, Part 1. Academic Press. p. 516. ISBN 012182263X.
- ^ Kurt Gottfried, Victor Frederick Weisskopf (1986). Concepts of particle physics, Volume 2. Oxford University Press. pp. 259 ff. ISBN 0195033930.
- ^ Michael Edward Peskin, Daniel V. Schroeder (1995). "§7.5 Renormalization of the electric charge". An introduction to quantum field theory. Westview Press. pp. 244 ff. ISBN 0201503972.
- ^
John F. Donoghue, Eugene Golowich, Barry R. Holstein (1994). Dynamics of the standard model. p. 47. ISBN 0521476526.
{{cite book}}: Text "Cambridge University Press" ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Peter Mészáros (1992). "§2.6 Quantum electrodynamics in strong fields". High-energy radiation from magnetized neutron stars. University of Chicago Press. pp. 56 ff. ISBN 0226520943.
- ^ Frederic V. Hartemann (2002). High-field electrodynamics. CRC Press. p. 428. ISBN 0849323789.
- ^ Jeremy S. Heyl, Lars Hernquist (1997). "Birefringence and Dichroism of the QED Vacuum". J Phys. A30: 6485–6492. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/30/18/022.
- ^ a b
Luciano Boi (2009). "Creating the physical world ex nihilo? On the quantum vacuum and its fluctuations". In Ernesto Carafoli, Gian Antonio Danieli, Giuseppe O. Longo, editors (ed.). The Two Cultures: Shared Problems. Springer. p. 55. ISBN 8847008689.
{{cite book}}:|editor=has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list (link) - ^
PAM Dirac (2001). Jong-Ping Hsu, Yuanzhong Zhang, editors (ed.). Lorentz and Poincaré invariance: 100 years of relativity. World Scientific. p. 440. ISBN 9810247214.
{{cite book}}:|editor=has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list (link)