Bitten, but not chewed

edit
From T J Hughes talk page

Chaosdruid

edit

(editprotected request answered=yes)

It seems that the user "Chaosdruid" has no knowledge of this article he claims to know about, if he was to actually read some more news articles around the internet, he would see that the administration section is absolutely correct. Instead it seems he wants to start an edit war. Instead of making edits on the users talk page, maybe he should concentrate on improving the article its-self. 86.160.129.215 (talk) 23:27, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

The page is not protected, so the edit request is unnecessary. Besides, you should be aware that you are not allowed to use wording that is too close to the source: see WP:Copyright violations and WP:Close paraphrasing. Ucucha 00:02, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Down Admin, Down

edit
Bitey admins

Dr Kiernan

edit
Own talk page

Constructive editing

edit

In regard to your deletion of material from Vandalia (colony)[1] and Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz[2]: "As long as any of the facts or ideas added to the article would belong in a 'finished' article, they should be retained and the writing cleaned up on the spot, or tagged if necessary." In these cases, the information presented was reasonable and easily sourced online. See WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM for additional tips on how to constructively deal with unsourced information. Thanks. —  AjaxSmack  23:03, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Fuck off. DrKiernan (talk) 06:22, 31 July 2011 (UTC)