Chella123

Dear Chellappa.M

Thank you for your reponse. Can you help provide me with the e-mail id of the person you take instructions from. I would like to open a dialogue with them as my posts are accurate, and supported by the records of the company and the final ruling from the American Arbitration Association.

Because my posts are accurate, and there is no contention on their accuracy, they cannot and should not be removed.

Thank you for letting me know the e-mail id of who is giving you these instructions so I can have further dialogue.

I do look forward to your reply to this post.

Most Sincerely,

Steve Ross

Stevejross 20:20, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

=================================================================================

Dear Chella123,

I would like to open up a discussion with you. Would you prefer to have the discussion on your user talk page (this page), or would you prefer to have it on my user talk page?

I have copied below from Wikipedia the first recommended step towards resolving editing differences, and would like to discuss with you.

Thank you for your reply to this quick note. I do ask that you would communicate with me please.

Sincerely,

Stephen Ross Stevejross 12:54, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

=================================================================================

Hi Steve,

I am part of UST Global and take care of UST Wikipedia page. It is my responsibility to update and edit the UST Global page as per the instruction given to me. The contents in the Wikipedia page are information’s that we like to highlight regarding our company. Hope you understand our requirement.

Thank you, Chellappa.M

=================================================================================

First Step Recommended from article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Resolving_disputes

First step: Talk to the other parties involved

The first resort in resolving almost any conflict is to discuss the issue on a talk page, you may even post the proposed content on the talk page. Either contact the other party on that user's talk page, or use the talk page associated with the article in question. Never carry on a dispute on the article page itself. When discussing an issue, stay cool and do not mount personal attacks. Take the other person's perspective into account and try to reach a compromise. Assume that the other person is acting in good faith unless you have clear evidence to the contrary.

Both at this stage and throughout the dispute resolution process, talking to other parties is not simply a formality to be satisfied before moving on to the next forum. Failure to pursue discussion in good faith shows that you are trying to escalate the dispute instead of resolving it. This will make people less sympathetic to your position and may prevent you from effectively using later stages in dispute resolution. In contrast, sustained discussion and serious negotiation between the parties, even if not immediately successful, shows that you are interested in finding a solution that fits within Wikipedia policies.