This article needs additional citations for verification. (July 2010) |
Part of a series on |
Apartheid |
---|
In South Africa, the term township and location usually refers to the (often underdeveloped) urban living areas that, from the late 19th century until the end of Apartheid, were reserved for non-whites (black Africans, Coloureds and Indians). Townships were usually built on the periphery of towns and cities.[1][2] The term township also has a distinct legal meaning, in South Africa's system of land title, that carries no racial connotations.
Apartheid
editDuring the Apartheid Era blacks were evicted from properties that were in areas designated as "white only" and forced to move into segregated townships. Separate townships were established for each of the three designated non-white race groups (blacks, coloureds and Indians). Legislation that enabled the Apartheid government to do this included the Group Areas Act.
Townships for non-whites were also called locations or lokasie (Afrikaans translation), and are often still referred to by that name in smaller towns. The slang term "Kasie", a popular short version of "Lokasie" is also used sometimes to refer to townships.
Townships sometimes have large informal settlements nearby.
Despite their origins in apartheid South Africa, today the terms township, location and informal settlements are not used pejoratively. However policy makers are, as in the 1950s, once again using the term 'slums' in a highly pejorative way.[citation needed]
Most South African towns and cities will have at least one township associated with them. Today they are often viewed as just one of the many suburbs that an urban area might have. Some old townships have seen rapid development since 1994, with, for instance, wealthy, and middle-income areas growing up in parts of Soweto, Chatsworth, etc.
Post-apartheid
editForced removal from city centres to townships has continued in post-apartheid South Africa. The difference is that under apartheid all black people faced forced removals to townships while now it is only the poor living in shack settlements that face eviction to townships on the peripheries of cities. In Cape Town and Durban this has given rise to mass resistance.[citation needed]
The new townships being built to house people forcibly removed from shack settlements have much smaller houses than those built under apartheid and are often, but not always, even further from city centres than apartheid era townships.[citation needed]
Problems Within the Townships
editWithin the townships, the communities face many troubling issues. Most often the homes are built on lands that are not owned by the occupier so it is there illegally. [3] Since the houses are not there with the government’s permission they most likely do not have the proper services needed. With out the proper services, such as sewage, electricity, roads, and clean water, life becomes very difficult for them. [4] The many South African townships are run uniquely, but they also face similar problems.
Rehabilitation of Infrastructure
editThere are three infrastructures within the townships that are in need of repair, which are the sewerage, water, and electrical. The problems that each of these infrastructures cause for the residents is mainly due to the lack of sanitation, accessibility, and availability. The government does not help out the people that are not actually residents so they are forced to use the resources of the residents, which end up causing more problems for the whole community. Matters are made worse because each of these infrastructures are serviced by different department so the efficiency goes down unless there is substantial co-ordination at all stages of the project planning, budgeting, and implementation cycle. [5]
Sewerage
editThe sewerage system within the townships is very poorly planned and constructed. With the populations continually growing the sewerage was not built for a growing population so it is not able to deal with it causing an overload on the system. The overload then causes problems such as frequent blockages, surcharges, as well as spilling over and causing the roads to flood. [6] Most areas within the townships have a limited number of public toilets that are so over used, abused, and quickly become health hazards for the community. One problem that was not foreseen, when building the houses so close together and so densely packed in one area, is the poor access for maintenance of the sewerage system. Having so many houses in one area and very little room in between each house make it very difficult for someone to be able to go in and fix the pipes. Whether it is a local plumber or a government plumber the job is very difficult to accomplish and when they finally do come around to fixing the pipes it could potentially end up causing more issues such as more flooding, traffic around the area of construction, and a long wait for the resident to go with out water. [7] Some of the areas on the outside of the townships or near riverbanks and tributaries do not have access to facilities because they are not connected to the formal waterborne sewerage system.
Water
editThe water is a very challenging situation to deal with. With the mass numbers of residents the pressure of the pumps become very low because they it is being used so much at the same time. With low pressure the water becomes difficult to get and sparse amounts are already available to each household. With each section of the townships is normally one pump per section. The water is used for everything from cleaning clothes, cooking, drinking, bathing, and cleaning the house. Having very little water accessible to each section makes it very hard to get enough water for a day per household. [8] One way that this could be improved is to make some improvements to the main water supply and to add more pumps in each region in the township but have it coming from a different water system allowing more water in each area but without dealing with lower pressure.
Electricity
editAs you drive through the narrow streets in is very hard to miss the overload of electrical wires strung from the trees leading to the only power box in the area. Hundreds of wires come off of the power box because the residents of the area were not given access to the electricity they need so they decided they would take it. This is of course illegal and not to mention very dangerous but every house in the area has a wire coming out of it and every wire is known by their owner in order to fix problems as soon as they arise. [9] Most of the sub-stations are very unsecured to begin with so having so many additional wires coming off of it is very dangerous for the people near by and the kids playing in the area. The government not like that the people using the sub-stations are not actual residents so they refuse to give them electricity but if they were to install more sub-stations then the problem would be solved. [10]
Tributaries and River Banks
editSome of the townships, such as Alexandra and Diepsloot, are built along or by a tributary or river bank. This causes problems with the high density of people, poor access, and services. These areas are extremely dense with only tortuous, narrow access, few communal water points and banks of chemical toilets on the peripheries of the settlements. The settlements are beginning to be built in the old tributaries due to the continuing growth of the townships. With the houses in the dried up tributaries is a potential problem when a large storm comes and the tributary starts to fill up with water again or if there is a backup of sewerage coming into the tributary. The houses built in that area are all in danger of being destroyed by natural occurrences. As the area grew the tributaries were piped and a number of concrete aprons and gullies were constructed over the tributary to which the communal water points drain. The gullies were then chocked with garbage and the tributaries appear to be substantially blocked but this will not hold off the water for very long if a flood came through. [11] Flooding is also an issue in the river bank areas where houses were built. These houses should be relocated but most places are running out of space to expand which is how those houses ended up in the area below the flood lines. Some people think it could be a good thing to live next to s river in order to be able to use the water to do laundry and clean but most of the time the water in that area is so polluted and trashed that it is unsanitary for them to use due to all the local pollutant of nearby factories or plants.
Backyard Shacks
editBackyard shacks are additional units on a plot of land that is rented out by the land owner as a significant income to the main householder. A plot of land designed for a house big enough for one family has turned into a plot of land that holds on average six families instead of one. [12] These structures are indeed illegal by the government and built without compliance with planning and building code norms and have made servicing and maintenance very difficult for the whole community. Having the excess amount of people on one plot of land has created inevitable strains on the infrastructure and services causing capacity and blockage problems. The government refuses to make the backyard shacks legal but it would unethical to make that large a number of people move so a compromise is needed in order to satisfy both parties. In the township called Diepsloot near Johannesburg a study was done in 2001 and it shows that 24% of the residents lived in brick structures, 43% were in shack areas, and 27% were in backyard shacks. [13]
Education
editChanges have been attempted within the last few years to make the education system better but one of the biggest problems facing African youths is the lack of education.[14] The education system in South Africa is set up differently than the rest of the world. School life spans 13 years or grades, from grade 0, other wise known as grade R or “reception year”, through to grade 12 or “matic”. All South Africans have the right to a basic education but most of the kids in the poor areas end up dropping out around 9th grade.[15] The Bill of Rights of the country’s Constitution states that they have the obligation, through reasonable measures, to progressively make education available and accessible. Then in the South African Schools Act of 1996 education became compulsory for all South Africans from the age of seven to age 15, or the completion of 9th grade. .[16] In order to target the education of the poorest of the poor the government created two notable programs. One is the fee-free schools, institutions that receive all their required funding from the state and so do not have to charge school fees. These schools were carefully identified in the country’s most poverty-stricken areas, and will made up 40% of all school in 2007. .[17] The other is the National Schools Nutrition Program, which feeds about 7 million schoolchildren every day. The government is targeting improvements in the infrastructure for poorer school including libraries, laboratory, and sports fields as well as improvements in math and science scores. Other strategies include learner transport, crime campaigns to address violence, sexual abuse and gangsterism, the “Drop-all-and-read” campaign that focuses on basic literacy and numeracy skills.[18] After the implementation of these programs the national budget has increased as well as the matric pass rate and total number of students. .[19] Even with all these increases and positive transformations they have not been accompanied by a better distribution of education. This skewed distribution is mainly attributable to higher and more rapid drop out rates among the poor, rather than to a lack of initial access to schooling.[20] The formerly white Model-C schools uniformly produce better results and their governing bodies are able to raise substantial private funds used to get resources that are then unreachable by the rural and township schools which survive on the commitment of their teachers. .[21]
Gangs and Violence
editKids as early as age 12 or 13 will begin the initiation into a local gang. Kids that begin that young have a role model that is a gang, which is the reason for their own induction. Some see violence and gangs as a way of life and a culture. So if their role model is seen doing something wrong they do not see it as a crime but idolized. Without a conviction of the wrongdoers the kids sense of mortality becomes distorted. Some blame the apartheid for leaving a bitter legacy of poverty, inequality, and the nobility of violence. The weapon of choice for most is a gun and with easy accessibility anyone is able to get one. It is estimated that out of the 14 million guns in circulation, in South Africa, only four million are registered and licensed to legal gun owners.[22]
List of townships
editWell-known townships include:
- Alexandra, Gauteng
- Atteridgeville
- Azaadville
- Bekkersdal
- Boipatong
- Bophelong
- Botleng
- Chatsworth
- Dainfern
- Daveyton
- Diepmeadow (Diepkloof and Meadowlands)
- Diepsloot
- Dobsonville
- Duduza
- Eersterust
- Evaton
- Galeshewe
- Guguletu
- Hammanskraal
- Imizamo Yethu
- Impumelelo
- Ivory Park
- Kagiso
- Katlehong
- Khayelitsha
- Kayamandi
- Khutsong
- Kwakwatsi
- KwaMashu
- KwaThema
- Langa
- Laudium
- Lebowakgomo
- Lenasia
- Mahwelereng
- Mamelodi
- Marlboro Gardens
- Masiphumelele
- Mdantsane
- Metsimaholo
- Mfuleni
- Mitchell's Plain
- Moakeng
- Matwabeng
- Mohlakeng
- Mokwallo
- Munsieville
- Nyanga
- Orange Farm
- Phoenix
- Ratanda
- Refengkgotso
- Refilwe
- Reiger Park
- Roshnee
- Sebokeng
- Seshego
- Sharpeville
- Soshanguve
- Soweto
- Tembisa
- Thokoza
- Tsakane
- Tumahole
- Umlazi
- Vosloorus
- Wattville
- Westlake
- Zamdela
- Zithobeni
- Zwide
See also
edit- Bantustan
- Ghetto
- Racial segregation
- Township tourism
- Old Location, a township of Windhoek, Namibia
References
edit- ^ Pettman, Charles (1913). Africanderisms; a glossary of South African colloquial words and phrases and of place and other names. Longmans, Green and Co. p. 298.
- ^ [[International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences]] (PDF). p. 406.
{{cite book}}
: URL–wikilink conflict (help) - ^ Interactive Planning Workshop for Johannesburg. Greater Johannesburg Metropolitan Council. Johannesburg, South Africa. September 27-30, 2000. Web. 8 Oct. 2011. <http://web.mit.edu/urbanupgrading/upgrading/case-examples/overview-africa/alexandra-township.html>
- ^ Interactive Planning Workshop for Johannesburg. Greater Johannesburg Metropolitan Council. Johannesburg, South Africa. September 27-30, 2000. Web. 8 Oct. 2011. <http://web.mit.edu/urbanupgrading/upgrading/case-examples/overview-africa/alexandra-township.html>
- ^ Interactive Planning Workshop for Johannesburg. Greater Johannesburg Metropolitan Council. Johannesburg, South Africa. September 27-30, 2000. Web. 8 Oct. 2011. <http://web.mit.edu/urbanupgrading/upgrading/case-examples/overview-africa/alexandra-township.html>
- ^ Harber, Anton. Diepsloot. Jeppestown: Jonathan Ball Publishers LTD, 2011. 2011. 1-226. Print.
- ^ Harber, Anton. Diepsloot. Jeppestown: Jonathan Ball Publishers LTD, 2011. 2011. 1-226. Print.
- ^ Interactive Planning Workshop for Johannesburg. Greater Johannesburg Metropolitan Council. Johannesburg, South Africa. September 27-30, 2000. Web. 8 Oct. 2011. <http://web.mit.edu/urbanupgrading/upgrading/case-examples/overview-africa/alexandra-township.html>
- ^ Harber, Anton. Diepsloot. Jeppestown: Jonathan Ball Publishers LTD, 2011. 2011. 1-226. Print.
- ^ Interactive Planning Workshop for Johannesburg. Greater Johannesburg Metropolitan Council. Johannesburg, South Africa. September 27-30, 2000. Web. 8 Oct. 2011. <http://web.mit.edu/urbanupgrading/upgrading/case-examples/overview-africa/alexandra-township.html>
- ^ Interactive Planning Workshop for Johannesburg. Greater Johannesburg Metropolitan Council. Johannesburg, South Africa. September 27-30, 2000. Web. 8 Oct. 2011. <http://web.mit.edu/urbanupgrading/upgrading/case-examples/overview-africa/alexandra-township.html>
- ^ Interactive Planning Workshop for Johannesburg. Greater Johannesburg Metropolitan Council. Johannesburg, South Africa. September 27-30, 2000. Web. 8 Oct. 2011. <http://web.mit.edu/urbanupgrading/upgrading/case-examples/overview-africa/alexandra-township.html>
- ^ Harber, Anton. Diepsloot. Jeppestown: Jonathan Ball Publishers LTD, 2011. 2011. 1-226. Print.
- ^ Mvunganyl, Jackson. "US NGO Teams with South African Schools to Enhance Education in Townships." Voice of America. (2011): n. page. Web. 8 Oct. 2011. <http://www.voanews.com/english/news/africa/US-NGO-Teams-with-South-African-Schools-to-Enhance-Education-in-Townships020411-115306769.html>
- ^ >"Education in South Africa." SouthAfrica.info. N.p., n.d. Web. 8 Oct 2011. <http://www.southafrica.info/about/education/education.htm>
- ^ >"Education in South Africa." SouthAfrica.info. N.p., n.d. Web. 8 Oct 2011. <http://www.southafrica.info/about/education/education.htm>
- ^ >"Education in South Africa." SouthAfrica.info. N.p., n.d. Web. 8 Oct 2011. <http://www.southafrica.info/about/education/education.htm>
- ^ Motloung, Hloni. "Township and Rural Schools continue to be marginalized as inequality in the education system persists commented Graeme Bloch, Education Specialist, Development Bank of Southern Africa at the Knowledge Week." n.d. n. page. Print.
- ^ >"Education in South Africa." SouthAfrica.info. N.p., n.d. Web. 8 Oct 2011. <http://www.southafrica.info/about/education/education.htm>
- ^ Motloung, Hloni. "Township and Rural Schools continue to be marginalized as inequality in the education system persists commented Graeme Bloch, Education Specialist, Development Bank of Southern Africa at the Knowledge Week." n.d. n. page. Print.
- ^ Motloung, Hloni. "Township and Rural Schools continue to be marginalized as inequality in the education system persists commented Graeme Bloch, Education Specialist, Development Bank of Southern Africa at the Knowledge Week." n.d. n. page. Print.
- ^ >"Guns, gangs and culture of violence." BBC News. (2002): n. page. Web. 19 Oct. 2011. <http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/1919382.stm>