- Comment: This draft should not go through AfC review (or at least not creation). Choi Seung-hee already exists and has been amended and added to here. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 19:48, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Choi Seung-hee was a Korean dancer born in 1911 who performed and choreographed performances in Japan, Korea, and globally. She is regarded as one of Korea’s cultural icons for her work in dance in North and South Korea as well as internationally.[1]
Biography
editChoi was born into a yangban-class family in Seoul, Korea during the colonial period, she was also known by the Japanese pronunciation of her name, Sai Shōki.[2] Despite the Japanese policy of Sōshi-kaimei, a policy of changing Korean names to Japanese names, she retained her Korean family name of Choi. Sai is the Japanese pronunciation of the Chinese character for Choi, and was not considered Japanese. The multiple pronunciation of her names shows the existing complex cultural relations within the Japanese Empire.[1] When she was a child, her family faced financial trouble after their lands were taken away by the Japanese.[3] Their only income came from her brother Choi Seung-il's manuscripts.[4]
After graduating from Sookmyung Girl's High School[1] at the age of fifteen, she tried to become a teacher to help her family financially.[5] She passed seventh amongst 860 applicants, but was rejected due to her age.[6] She was told to return a year later.[6]
Her brother, Choi Seung-il, suggested her to join Baku Ishii (1886-1962) after a performance he observed in 1926[7]to learn the art of dance.[8] Baku Ishii was a prominent Japanese modern dance and ballet dancer (and the father of Kan Ishii who became an actor and a classical composer during the 1940s-1960s). Choi Seung-il was part of the Korea Artist Proletariat Federation (KAPF), and had many connections in both Japan and Korea to journalists and intellectuals. This made it possible for him to connect Choi with Ishii as Ishii also did work for the KAPF. At first Ishii was hesitant to admit Choi as his student, as he believed that the Korean public did not appreciate dance and thought that their performance resembled that of a traveling circus instead of a respected troupe. Ishii was reluctant to accept Choi as his student because of how they would be viewed by the Korean and Japanese public. However, in 1926, he decided to accept her because he thought her addition would encourage a better relationship between Korea and Japan[1] Choi Seung-hee became mesmerized by Baku Ishii's performance, especially at his expressions of darkness and torment.[9] Ishii accepted Choi, and even offered to teach her for free and send her to music school.[10] In early 1920s Korea, it was uncommon for a family with conservative Confucian beliefs and ideals to allow for their child to study dance.[1]After Choe gained her parents' reluctant permission, she left for Japan with Ishii, his wife, his sister, and his students on the next day on March 25, 1926.[11]
Choi was Ishii's second Korean student. The first was Kang Hong-shik who left Ishii later and became a movie star under a Japanese name.[12] (The maternal grandson of Kang Hong-shik is Choi Min-soo, who is known as one of the most acclaimed actors in South Korea now).[12] At a time of anti-Korean sentiment heightened by the Korean independence movement and a false rumor that the ethnic Koreans were taking advantage of the 1923 Great Kantō Earthquake to commit violence, which triggered the Kantō Massacre upon the Koreans, Ishii was progressive and open to the Koreans.[13][circular reference][12]
Although the dance group performed successfully and brought in a lot of income, they struggled financially because of Ishii's debts.[14] He did not have the sufficient salary to give to his dancers.[15] To pay his debts, Ishii lowered the quality of the performances in exchange for quantity.[15] Choi and two Japanese dancers decided to leave the group.[16]
Choi returned to Korea in 1929 and founded her dancing art institute in Seoul called the Choi Seung‐hee Dance Research Institute 최승희무용예술연구소.[17] She had both Korean and Japanese students.[18] Upon her return, she was placed in a spotlight because of the political implications and weight of her international work as a Korean dancer. Magazines and newspapers wrote about her Western dance, dancing abroad, and personal life in Korea. The Korean media had a large interest in her work as a dancer and as part of the "new woman" phenomenon. She was particularly subject to media gossip as an unmarried woman. Choi differentiated herself from traditionalism, but also from the new women who specifically identified breaking jeongjo (chastity) as a more modern practice. Choi was continuously a subject to the public's backlash, as there were several rumors about her committing acts of adultery. Despite Choi’s desire to be recognized for developing new dances in Korea, the Korean society only regarded her as part of the "new woman" trend, setting her against the traditional ideal of women.[1.She was seen as an entertainer in the eyes of many Koreans rather than as a modern artist. Choi did not initially intend to study Korean dance at first, as the Korean society did not hold dance to the esteem of fine art; instead, dance was seen as a lowly form of entertainment associated with the gisaeng (courtesan).[1]
During this time in Korea, her brother introduced her to his alumni, Ahn Mak (originally named Ahn Pil-seung)[19] a student of Waseda University[1] The couple married on May 10, 1931.[20] Just three months after their wedding, Ahn Mak was arrested for his connections with Communist sympathizers, and was released on October 15.[21] Ahn Mak went to Tokyo for the winter semester exam.[22] With Ahn's permission, Choi funded her institute from money earned from sending Ahn's manuscripts to the newspaper companies.[23] Funding was also gained from the sponsorship of The Dong-a Ilbo newspaper company.[24] Choi began to perform Korean folk dances during this time in Korea.[25] Ahn returned temporarily after learning of Choi's pregnancy.[19] Their daughter Ahn Seung-ja was born on July 20, 1932.[19] Choi disbanded her institute.[26] Choi became drawn to the Japanese metropolis after a cultural bloom in the 1930s, she found work and artistic opportunities by appealing to Japanese audiences by using colonial traditions.[1]
There was also controversy about Choi’s close relationship with the Japanese imperial government. For example, in 1929, the Sookmyung Girl's High School as they threatened to deem her a dishonorable alumni in response to her dancing in a Japanese dance troupe. Such a relationship with Japan made her interesting in the public sphere as only seven of her dances were traditionally Korean.[1]
Choi returned to Japan with her daughter and with a student from her disbanded institute, Kim Min-ja. Kim Min-ja wanted to follow Choi to Japan, and she offered to work as Seung-ja's nanny.[27] Choi continued to study under Ishii where she distinguished herself as a talented dancer. She developed her own modern dances inspired by Korean folk dances, which had been considered by a lot of the Koreans as lowly works. It was Ishii and Ahn who suggested her to learn the Korean folk dances[28] instead of a Western style of dance[1]. Ishii introduced Choi to Han Song-joon who taught Choi more of the Korean dances.[29] At a modern dance competition that was hosted by a monthly magazine 영녀계, Choi performed her Korean dances, one of which she was disguised as a man and artistically imitated her father's drunken dance.[30] (After the competition at the end of one of her later performances 풍랑을 헤가르고, she took off her mask of an old man's face on stage).[31]
Theater organizations in Japan supported Choi and used her image as a colonial woman. They used femininity and Asian Tradition to create a sense of sensibility and superiority of the empire. The image of femininity was anticipated to play a role in bridging the divide between perceptions of colonized individuals and colonial encounters. As well as, alleviating the Western powers' hostility towards Japanese militarism in Asia. Choi’s career trajectory and the various spaces in which she performed generated multiple and distinct identities influenced by the desires of the intended audience. The chronological shifts in Choi’s career as well as the national tensions she navigated gave insight to contradictions within the Japanese colonial empire. The portrayal of Choi's image coincided with the rapid expansion of media and entertainment during wartime, effectively utilizing Choi's fame for political gain. Her work became a tremendously popular cultural phenomenon in Japan at the time, with Japanese imperialism playing a pivotal role in shaping colonial culture.[1]
Choi and Ahn researched historical texts on the forgotten Korean dances. Choi had already seen the sword dances of the shamans and the kisaengs in Korea.[32] Choi sought an energetic style.[32] Ahn found texts of ancient Korean militaristic sword dances from a library.[33]
Choi began to work as a model. She used the money that she earned from modelling to fund her performances.[34] She also began to appear in musicals.[35] Ahn used his money that was meant for tuition fees to fund Choi's performance.[36]
Ishii continued to have financial problems in 1936.[37] In order to help him, Choi and Ishii's six students performed in Taiwan.[38] Their performances in Japan and Taiwan were all successful. Not long after her return from Taiwan, Choi bought a two-story mansion in Tokyo.[38]
A Korean marathon runner named Sohn Kee-chung won the gold medal in the 1936 Summer Olympics in Berlin. Because Korea was under Japanese rule, Son had no choice but to represent Japan. The Japanese Government-General of Korea had the CEOs of two Korean newspapers, The Joseon Joongang Ilbo (조선중앙일보) and The Dong-a Ilbo (동아일보), lose their jobs after they had the photo of the Japanese flag on Son's uniform erased on their news articles.[39] After losing their jobs, the two former CEOs organized a celebration banquet for Sohn upon his return.[39] They invited Choi who had returned temporarily to Korea.[40] Years later, when Sohn heard of accusations on Choi being a traitor for Japan, it was said that he exclaimed, "then are you going to look at me as a supporter for Japan because I ran with the Japanese flag on my chest?"[41]
She was supported by numerous Japanese intellectuals, including Yasunari Kawabata, and corresponded with both Jean Cocteau and Pablo Picasso. She was also a vocalist, and made recordings at Taepyeong Records and Kirin Records (in Manchukuo), before making her 1936 album Garden of Italy at Columbia Records Japan.
s Choi earned fame across several countries as well as in the West, several Japanese critics wrote about Choi's work. Critics They praised Choi’s work as they believed that she could represent one of the Manchuko national mottos that called for Five Races under One Union. Japanese critic, Natsuya Mitsuyoshi also acclaimed Choi's success at her recital in Shanghai in 1943. He described it as a great representation of Asian people looking to form Great Asia under Japanese Rule. Choi performed as a Japanese dancer yet it was believed she sympathized with Korea and she was esteemed by Koreans. Nevertheless she later received a great deal of criticism in North Korea for assimilating to dancing under the empire.[1]
Foreign tour
editChoi was the first female dancer in colonial Korea to perform outside of her country, even though Japan did not allow for dances to express resentment or resistance towards the Japanese Empire.[1]. In 1937 the Japanese military authorities asked Baku Ishii to provide dance performances as entertainment for the Japanese troops after the Sino-Japanese war began. This led Ishii and his dancers to travel around Taiwan, China, and Vietnam with dancers from the Ishii Dance School in Tokyo. Thanks to this tour, Ishii's students earned a grand reputation during the time of the Second Sino-Japanese War (1937-1945). During this time, dance was not only an artistic performance. Choi’s performance played with the boundaries that are limited by language and dialect. Her performances served as carriers of propaganda across the Japanese empire. Choi’s dance career mainly took place during a time of war as she danced from age 16 to her mid-30s. Because of this, her dance career took place under Japanese imperialism and that influenced the treatment she received from authorities in her country, when living both in South and North Korea. Critics debated the use of Choi’s work to spread propaganda and were concerned with how non-Koreans viewed Korea.[7] Such debate was generated as her work made a different socio-political space. She was unlike other dancers because of her identity as a Korean dancer in a Japanese troupe.[1]
On January 11, 1938, Choi, Ahn, and her pianist Lee Gwang-joon arrived in San Francisco.[42] By this time, Choi and Ahn researched many different traditional dances including the bosal dance (보살춤).[43] Choi's performances were held in San Francisco (January 22), in Los Angeles (February 2 - Ebell Theatre), and in New York City (February 19).[44][45][46] The reactions of the audiences and the reviews were good.[47] In New York City, she watched the performances of the famous Broadway musicians and dancers.[48]
In early November 1938, famous people such as Leopold Stokowski, John Steinbeck, Maurice Dekobra, and Charlie Chaplin went to the Guild Theatre (now the August Wilson Theatre) to watch her perform.[49] Because of her use of the Japanese pronunciation of her name when she performed in the United States, she was criticized as a Japanese collaborator by Koreans in the Korean independence movement, but the Japanese government saw her as working for Korean independence, as pro-independence souvenirs were sold at her American shows.
Choi and her group left the United States after the Nanjing Massacre and the second Sino-Japanese war[1], on December 17, 1938, and they arrived at Le Havre, France on December 24.[50] The performances were held in Paris (January 31, 1939), Brussels (February 6), Cannes (February 26), and Marseille (March 1).[51] They performed in Switzerland during mid-March, and in Italy during late March.[52] Starting from April 1, they performed in the smaller cities of Southern Germany.[52] In mid-April, they performed in the Netherlands.[53] All of Choi's performances in Europe received rave reviews.[54] According to Choi's letter to her student, her traditional hat (the 초립동 모자) became a fashion trend in Paris.[55] In 1939, in an international dance competition in Brussels, Belgium, Choi was appointed as one of the judges along with Rudolf von Laban, Mary Wigman, Serge Lifar, and Anton Dolin.[56] After this competition, Choi was invited to perform at an international music and dance festival in The Hague, the Netherlands.[57] Afterwards, she performed at the Théâtre national de Chaillot in Paris.[58] The audiences included Pablo Picasso, Henri Matisse, Jean Cocteau, Romain Rolland, and Michel Simon.[59] Picasso sketched a drawing of Choi and gave it to her after her performance.[59]
The people in France were used to the tense situation in Europe that they learned from the newspapers and the radio news.[60] Everyone whom Choi met in France believed that there would not be another world war.[60] Hence, Choi and her group decided to stay despite a warning from the Japanese embassy.[61] She was expecting to perform in Italy, Northern Germany, and Scandinavia.[60] When Germany invaded Poland on September 1, 1939, France declared war on Germany two days later.[61] As the war in Poland raged on, Choi and her group began to evacuate. Their original plan was to evacuate to Italy.[62] This was before Italy joined with Germany and Japan in a Tripartite Pact and before Italy declared war. An employee of the Marseille consulate general warned Choi that Italy might declare war, and that a Japanese ship called the Hakone Maru carrying about 190 Japanese evacuees would arrive the next day from Italy.[62] Choi and her group embarked the Hakone Maru and evacuated to the United States instead.[62] She continued her performing tour in the United States, Brazil, Uruguay, Argentina, Chile, and Mexico.
In 1943, Choi began a series of 130 performances with the goal of comforting soldiers (known as: tairiku imon) in Manchuria, Korea, and northern and central China. Some postcolonial critics in Korea argue that Choi was forced to serve soldiers by the Japanese colonial regime.[1] Category:Wikipedia Student Program
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o Park, Sang Mi (2006-08-01). "The Making of a Cultural Icon for the Japanese Empire: Choe Seung-Hui's U.s. Dance Tours and "New Asian Culture" In the 1930s and 1940s". positions: asia critique. 14 (3): 597–632. doi:10.1215/10679847-2006-015. ISSN 1067-9847.
- ^ Park 2006
- ^ Kang 2012, p. 21
- ^ Kang 2012, p. 22
- ^ Kang 2012, p. 11
- ^ a b Kang 2012, p. 13
- ^ a b Hoshino, Yukiyo (2016-06-30). "Use of Dance to Spread Propaganda during the Sino-Japanese War" (PDF). ATHENS JOURNAL OF HISTORY. 2 (3): 193.–198. doi:10.30958/ajhis.2-3-3.
- ^ Kang 2012, pp. 13–14
- ^ Kang 2012, p. 16
- ^ Kang 2012, p. 24
- ^ Kang 2012, p. 28
- ^ a b c Kang 2012, p. 41
- ^ "1923 Great Kantō earthquake". Wikipedia. Retrieved August 21, 2019.
- ^ Kang 2012, p. 65
- ^ a b Kang 2012, p. 66
- ^ Kang 2012, p. 69
- ^ Kang 2012, p. 74
- ^ Kang 2012, p. 75
- ^ a b c Kang 2012, pp. 82–83
- ^ Kang 2012, p. 89
- ^ Kang 2012, pp. 91–96
- ^ Kang 2012, p. 96
- ^ Kang 2012, pp. 96–97
- ^ Kang 2012, p. 97
- ^ Kang 2012, p. 113
- ^ Kang 2012, p. 103
- ^ Kang 2012, p. 103
- ^ Kang 2012, pp. 112–113
- ^ Kang 2012, p. 113
- ^ Kang 2012, p. 117
- ^ 전설의 세계적인 한국인 무용가 최승희
- ^ a b Kang 2012, p. 118
- ^ Kang 2012, p. 119
- ^ Kang 2012, p. 127
- ^ Kang 2012, p. 129
- ^ Kang 2012, p. 128
- ^ Kang 2012, p. 169
- ^ a b Kang 2012, p. 172
- ^ a b Kang 2012, p. 176
- ^ Kang 2012, pp. 176–177
- ^ Kang 2012, p. 328
- ^ Kang 2012, p. 205
- ^ Kang 2012, p. 226
- ^ Kang 2012, pp. 206–211
- ^ Los Angeles Times 1938
- ^ Martin 1938
- ^ Kang 2012, pp. 176–177
- ^ Kang 2012, p. 219
- ^ Kang 2012, p. 220
- ^ Kang 2012, pp. 223–225
- ^ Kang 2012, pp. 226–231
- ^ a b Kang 2012, p. 231
- ^ Kang 2012, pp. 231–232
- ^ Kang 2012, pp. 226–232
- ^ Kang 2012, p. 227
- ^ Kang 2012, p. 232
- ^ Kang 2012, p. 233
- ^ Kang 2012, p. 234
- ^ a b Kang 2012, p. 235
- ^ a b c Kang 2012, p. 238
- ^ a b Kang 2012, p. 239
- ^ a b c Kang 2012, p. 241