If you want to leave me a message, please use my talk page. Remember to sign your message with the ~~~~ tag. I will respond to all comments at your talk page.


I try to help out wiki as much as I can. Usually just small edits and vandalism reverts. I really enjoy finding, reverting and reporting vandalism. My edits and contributions may seem random because I LOVE the "Random article" button, but I make sure to research every article I edit. When I see a cite request I try my best to find one, when I see a POV statement I make sure to request a cite or remove it. Information you might think "everyone knows" still needs a cite, if anything it helps prevent hoaxes and they make an article more respectable. In my opinion a article for the most part can NOT have too many cites or inline links, and EVERY article needs at least a few references and cites to prevent original work being published on wiki. My personal goal is to try to make wikipedia as accurate, easy to use, and non-POV as possible.

I have a Serious Wikipediholism Problem, especially when it comes to tracking down vandalism, non-encyclopedic articles, and tagging pages with templates. I also try to keep an eye out for ideas to start new articles, but that's pretty damn hard since wikipedia has a article on just about everything you can think of.

I am always on the lookout for vandalism or other articles and statements that are not encyclopedic, Wikipedia is NOT a database for information on everything and everything that happens in the world, it needs to fit the notability guidelines for inclusion in wikipedia, or users like Me will tag and/or remove it.

-CrazyRob926 (talk · contribs · count)

This user has been awarded the Userbox Star Award for creating a particularly notable userbox.




Articles Started by Me

edit

Articles I have contributed significantly to

edit







 
The three-revert rule

Many people know that if someone reverts an article more than three times in 24 hours (3RR), they may be blocked to prevent edit warring. But did you know that:

  • Although reverts on different articles do not count towards the limit, different reverts on the same article do count. So if you revert Paragraph A twice and Paragraph B twice in 24 hours, you have made four reverts and may be blocked.
  • If you revert three times, wait for 24 hours and start reverting again, you may be blocked for 'gaming' the rule. The three-revert rule is an electric fence, not an entitlement.
  • Although you cannot be blocked for repeatedly reverting vandalism, many Wikipedians mistake edits for vandalism when they are not. For example, edits that do not respect the neutral point of view policy are not vandalism.

The easiest way to avoid being blocked for reverting is to revert as little as possible and discuss with your fellow editors instead. Some editors limit themselves to one or no reverts a day. Select categories on Wikipedia are limited to 1RR (one revert rule). Those articles will have an edit notice to apprise you of their special status. For 1RR you may only revert one edit in the entire category per 24-hours.

To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}