 | This is an alternative account of CyclePat. |
FAQ
editQ #1:Why you making the page a mess with things like "citation required" or "synthesised", t looks like you are kinda being disruptive judging by your edits there, as well as getting blocked over some talk page comments. It seems that a lot of edits you made were disruptive. And what was that "According to XXX" all about? I?
- A:I'm not here to be your teacher and I will most likely not answer your questions. But since I seem to get a bunch of people asking me questions more or less on my mannerisms towards requesting a properly sourced here is my answer. Please try and maintain respect by commenting on content not mannerisms per WP:CIV. To try and answer your question though, if you are wondering what the heck I'm doing, why isn't this disruptive.,,Here it is: If it's not sourced, not properly cited, then I will most likely remove it as per Wikipedia's rules WP:OR, WP:VER, WP:CITE. If you ask questions like... Isn't it better to have something that is not sourced, I will probably concede (as a reasonable person) but I will also point you towards the Wiki rules and the counter argument that wikipedia is not a place for Original Research. Next thing you know we'll have people saying the stupidest things which we would then have to let be. (Mind you, we could have the stupidest things anyway, so long as it is properly cited.) Anyways, my response would probably be something like "I am challenging the information that is written in this article and request that prior to putting the information which I removed back into the article that you please provide proper sources and citations as per WP:VER." That means if you want to keep the information go to WP:CITE and use a bibliography maker (such as easybib.com) and a reference section to properly cite. Another way of citing and to avoid WP:POV is to state, "According to "so and so"," and state the fact and place the name of "so and so" in a bibliography. Good luck! Adieu.