User:Cyclonenim/Admin coaching

purge the cache ·  edit count · my statistics · edit summary usage · 1 FA · 6 GAs · 3 DYKs

account creator, rollbacker and autoreviewer · admin coaching · leave a message · email me

This page is best viewed in Mozilla Firefox or Opera

Awards · Sandbox · Email Me · Guestbook · Admin coaching · Vandalism levels · Random Article · Main Page

Cyclonenim (talk · message · contribs · global contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · user creation · block user · block log · count · total · logs · summary · email | lu · rfas · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · checkuser · spi · socks | rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp | current rights · rights log (local) · rights log (global/meta) | rights · renames · blocks · protects · deletions · rollback · admin · logs | UHx · AfD · UtHx · UtE)

Archive 1

Still alive

Hey guys, I'm archiving all the above for future reference should we need it, but I suspect it'll still be a while. I plan to start phasing myself back into a lot of areas over coming weeks as I've found spare time to start editing again properly, and to start working in administrative areas again. Thanks for your patience over the past month, I've found it very demanding with starting university and everything, but hopefully we can start on track again soon. Hope all is well with you two, let me know if you want to collaborate on anything. Regards, --—Cyclonenim | Chat  03:00, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

AFDs

Per my previous post, I'd like it if one of you could review some AfDs I've recently participated in if you're not too busy.

• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edwin Curry
  • I'll have to disagree with your argument here, but it shows that you've thought through your answer which is what we look for. BLP is a pretty hot place to be working at the moment...
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khalid Usman
  • Good, concise argument.
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ion Davidov
  • Good call striking when a counter-argument was proposed that you agreed with. Never be afraid to do this, it shows good temperament if you can be persuaded by a good argument.
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Steam titles (2nd nomination)
  • I agree with your reasoning here, but it would have been helpful to mention the relevant guideline, even though many others had already done so.
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spank jazz
  • Another good, concise argument.
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ADL (artist)
  • Gut instinct is good (that was my instinct upon a brief look at the article too), but again, outlining the relevant guideline/notability criteria and then explaining why the artist didn't meet them is probably the better way to go.
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delia Gonzalez
  • Good work with the comment there - if you're not sure either way, providing additional information for others who are more familiar with the topic can be helpful.
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Leip
  • Good reasoning, a link to WP:BIO would not have hurt either. Also, I'm not really sure what the point of {{ec}} is, especially in this case.

Thanks :) I'll post at your talks as well, since I'm not sure if you saw the last message I left here. Regards, --—Cyclonenim | Chat  17:53, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

I've done some at-a-glance review above, if I have missed anything obvious it's surely because it's late =). Great to see you getting active again, and if you have any questions please don't hesitate to email me again or post at my talkpage. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:17, 1 February 2010 (UTC).

Thanks for the review, good to know I'm on the right track! Regards, --—Cyclonenim | Chat  17:47, 16 February 2010 (UTC)