All three papers are open for anyone to comment.
The New Scientist: What Has (Not) Changed So Far and What Will Change in the Near Future?
edit
“
|
Digitization opens up new opportunities to provide content, such as through semantic and multimedia enrichment. The scientific journal of the future adheres to open Web standards and creates a framework in which the technological possibilities of the digital media can be exploited by authors, readers and machines alike, and content remains continuously linkable.
|
”
|
Developing scientific software
edit
- One of the reasons why doing things in the open (incl. research) makes sense.
- Key issues, again:
- integration of tools with workflows
- (public) version history
- having the code public prevents reinventions of the wheel
- Hackathons: Etherpads*Some of ongoing software development projects I am currently involved with:
- What did the interviewees say about how they chose programming languages, code libraries or the structures of their software?
- "Release when done" or "release on schedule"?
Video in electronic dissertations
edit
“
|
Authors would self-publish their works, but the reviewer networks would provide a page for each book that acknowledged that it was a work recognized by a community of scholars and the peer-reviews of the book would be published online so that scholars could compare the finished product to the original reviews.
|
”
|
- multimedia in PDF
On embedding 3D / Video / Audio see [[Portable Document Format - version 1.7 (2008) was the first to fully support embedded (as opposed to linked) video and audio --Beursken (talk) 15:29, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, but things like pdfanim worked well before that - essentially embedding a loop over a series of images. -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 22:04, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Human-machine interaction
edit
- Remark about acting free chess champions being team of medium-"quality" human and bot players
- Fits with experience on Wikipedia, see Meet the 'bots' that edit Wikipedia
- And I'm Eureqa, also a robot scientist. Nice to meet you.
|