User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/Wetlands and the Wikimedia ecosystem
About
editThis page assists a talk given on 10 July 2023 at the Greifswald Mire Centre (GMC), following the NaTour event there a month earlier. Materials for the talk will be incorporated here until then.
Logistics
edit- Time and location: 13:15 CEST, Zoom
- For the abstract, see here.
- The talk's materials are accessible on-wiki via https://w.wiki/6tA4 (mobile) and https://w.wiki/6$Bo (desktop) and archived on Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8128877. You can also download the current version as a PDF via this link or explore the page in slide form or through its version history.
- Discussion is invited throughout.
Wikimedia projects
editWikipedia
editWikipedia is available in over 300 languages, together getting multiple billions of monthly page views.
Wikimedia Commons
editWikidata
editStructured data about more than 100 million entities.
Other Wikimedia projects
editAn example of how each of these projects has its own ways of sharing knowledge around a topic
The landscape around Wikimedia
edit"By 2030, Wikimedia will become the essential infrastructure of the ecosystem of free knowledge, and anyone who shares our vision will be able to join us."
Wikimedia for research
editWikimedia about research
editWikimedia resources relevant for research
editScholia provides about 30 types of scholarly profiles, all based on Wikidata (e.g. Hans Joosten and GMC)
Wikimedia for Bogs
editCategories, infoboxes, identifiers, links
Media files
editA carbon cycle diagram available in 18 languages
Articles
editTools like Citation Hunt assist in improving verifiability.
Structured data
editStructured data from different domains can be queried.
Statistics
editPageviews for the article Moor on the German Wikipedia from 2015-2023. See also cross-language stats.
Opportunities for further interactions
editMotivation
edit- Wikimedia projects are already widely used in research and many other contexts
- Reuse on Wikimedia projects is a great way to demonstrate Reusability of research in the FAIR sense
- Wikimedia contributions can be integrated with educational activities
- Five ways academics can contribute to Wikipedia
Further reading
edit- The LOTUS initiative for open knowledge management in natural products research (2022)
- Developing a scalable framework for partnerships between health agencies and the Wikimedia ecosystem (2021)
- Wikidata as a knowledge graph for the life sciences (2020)
- Geospatial data and Scholia (2018)
- Science Is Shaped by Wikipedia: Evidence from a Randomized Control Trial (2017)
- Wikipedia as a gateway to biomedical research (2017)
- Amplifying the impact of open access: Wikipedia and the diffusion of science (2016)
- Topic Pages: PLoS Computational Biology Meets Wikipedia (2012)
Basic principles of Wikimedia projects
editSome key principles that the ecosystem is built on
Five pillars of Wikipedia
edit- WP:5P1 Wikipedia is an encyclopedia
- WP:5P2 Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view
- WP:5P3 Wikipedia is free content that anyone can use, edit, and distribute
- WP:5P4 Wikipedia's editors should treat each other with respect and civility
- WP:5P5 Wikipedia has no firm rules
Core content policies
editCore content policies on the English Wikipedia; the other wikis have similar ones.
Contributing to Wikimedia projects
editListen to the edit stream:
multiple Wikipedias, Wikidata, both, recording
Contributing to Wikidata
editGeolocated Wikidata items, with highlighting of changes between October 2018 and May 2019
Contributing to Wikimedia Commons
editContributing to Wikipedia
editThere is always room for improvement, and there are initiatives like WikiProject Climate Change or #365climateedits to address that.
Issues with contributing to Wikimedia projects
editWhat I wonder is why professors don't curate [pages on] Wikipedia and add course materials and open access sections of textbooks, much of which they post online anyways. We aren't really seeing the potential that you would hope for with all of the Web 2.0 tools out there. We aren't seeing the academic community take advantage of them as much as other subsets of the community. — David Lipman (2010)
Wikifying biogeosciences
editIncrease opportunities to participate in the research process
editIn the FossiLab at the National Museum of Natural History in Washington, citizen scientists prepare fossils in an open-science fashion, with the public invited to observe.
Contextualizing invasion biology
editA Wikidata query for topics related to invasion biology
Interlinking GMC-run databases with Wikidata
editOpening up the GMC
edit- What can research institutions do to encourage open science?
- What about some pilot project run in an open-notebook science way, so that everyone can get a better feeling for how this works?
- What about the institute's ecological footprint and changes thereof?
Opening up climate communication
editUnpacking IPCC and IPBES Reports (2022) — non-open licensing and encapsulation in PDFs are an obstacle to reuse of images or citation information
Assessment on Peatlands, Biodiversity, and Climate Change
Wiki99
editWiki99 for chemistry. What about doing one for bogs?
Linking arts and sciences
editThanks
editAbstract
editBackground
editThis talk explores existing and potential interactions between wetland research and education on the one hand and the Wikimedia ecosystem on the other. This ecosystem - which includes sites like Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons, Wikidata and their respective communities and workflows - represents a sociotechnical platform providing a vast and continuously curated repository of openly accessible knowledge and reusable materials on a wide range of topics, including many that are relevant for wetland research. This resource is leveraged at the scale of billions of monthly direct pageviews and in many more indirect ways, e.g. via search engines or large language models.
Focus
editThe presentation begins by providing a general overview of the Wikimedia ecosystem, its structure, and its interactions with and impact on scientific communication. We will then explore how wetlands and wetland research are represented and how wetland-related communities can engage with the Wikimedia ecosystem, including reviewing Wikipedia articles, uploading scientific images or media files to Wikimedia Commons, utilizing Wikidata to connect and visualize reference data across knowledge domains or exploring open-science workflows taking place on Wikimedia infrastructures.
Pros and cons
editWe will also discuss the benefits of engaging with the Wikimedia ecosystem, including increasing the visibility and impact of wetland research, improving public understanding of scientific concepts, scientific contributions to societal discourse, and promoting collaboration and networking among scientists as well as between them and others. Additionally, we will cover some of the challenges and potential pitfalls of engaging with the Wikimedia ecosystem, such as the different writing styles and attribution mechanisms and the potential for conflicts of interest, bias and misinformation, along with mechanisms for addressing such issues.
See also
editRelated talks
edit- Biogeosciences and the Wikimedia ecosystem (2023)
- Impact-oriented Citizen Science: The role of Wikipedia, Wikidata and OpenStreetMap (2023)
- Climate knowledge and the Wikimedia ecosystem (2022)
- Unpacking IPCC and IPBES Reports (2022)
- Multilingual Structured Climate Research Data in Wikidata - The Community and Data Perspectives (2020)
- Bridging Science, Art, and Community in the New Arctic through Wikimedia projects (2019)
- Visualizing the research ecosystem of ecosystem research via Wikidata (2018)
- Wikimedia as a platform for scientific information — given at the neighbouring MPI for Chemical Ecology (2012)