Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
General info
edit- Whose work are you reviewing?
Dkilleen
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
Evaluate the drafted changes
editLead
edit- The lead gives a brief introduction of the restaurant including its locations, headquarters location, and how long it has been around.
- Darby has updated the lead with virtually all of the information in it and has improved its quality substantially.
- The lead does not include a brief description that clearly states of the article's major sections, this would potentially help with the flow of the article.
Content
edit- The content added is extremely relevant to the topic. I also think that its order in the article creates a nice flow of information.
- There could potentially be a section that describes how Piatti has evolved since its start, but nothing is missing that is obvious or that seems absolutely necessary.
- Yes, the content in the sections are up to date.
- Within the menu section, it would be helpful and interesting for the reader to go over any dishes they are known for in particular. Additionally, it could be included of where they source their ingredients from and any other information like if they make pasta in house.
Tone and Balance
edit- The general vibe of the article is neutral. There are some words like "extensive" that do give off a bias sounding tone that could be changed to ensure the article is neutral.
- There are no heavily biased claims.
Sources and References
edit- Yes, all of the information is factual and sourced.
- I think it would be helpful to get information that is not from Piatti itself so we know that it is not biased. Other information could be from local journals or other non biased sources.
- All of the links work and are cited properly.
Organization
edit- Yes, the content added is very clear and easy to read.
- It might be helpful to create multiple smaller paragraphs by breaking up the information already included so the organization is very clear.