Backup of MJD article
editOther stuff
editFlooney, Fred. "Article". [[Science (journal)|]]. 3 (17).
Stuff
editA Discourse Concerning the Beauty of Providence (1649) took an unfashionable line, namely that divine providence was more inscrutable than current interpreters were saying. It added to the reputation of Wilkins, when the Stuarts returned to the throne, to have warned that the short term reading of events as managed by God was risky.[1]
- ^ Guyatt, Nicholas (2007). Providence and the Invention of the United States, 1607-1876. Cambridge University Press. p. 43. ISBN 9780521867887. Guyatt quotes Wilkins as saying "Bo do de do".
| This file has been temporarily uploaded from the Wikimedia Commons and protected from modification because it is currently or will soon be displayed on the Main Page. For file history and other information, please see the Commons image description. Per the protection policy, files posted on the Main Page are protected due to their high visibility. Please discuss any necessary changes on the talk page; you may use the {{Edit protected}} template to ask an administrator to make the edit if it is supported by consensus.Administrators: You must also include a copy of the source information and the licence tag from the Commons along with the image.[1] Please delete this file after it is removed from the Main Page, and restore any Wikipedia-specific edits. |
3.1415926535898
|
Mac Lane, Saunders (1998), Categories for the Working Mathematician (2nd ed.), Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-98403-2
Second line
Second paragraph
{{citation}}
(Left →)
Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "http://localhost:6011/en.wikipedia.org/v1/":): {\displaystyle \input prooftree}
B|-b a|-a ------------------ Left \rarr ('G = b, 'S = {}) g |- g b,b\rarr a |- a ----------------------------------- Left \rarr ('G = g, S = b\rarr a) g,b\rarr a,g\rarr b |- a ----------------- Right \rarr b\rarr a,g\rarr b |- g\rarr a ---------------------- Right \rarr b\rarr a |- (g\rarr b) \rarr g\rarr a --------------------------- Right \rarr |- (b\rarr a) \rarr (g\rarr b) \rarr g\rarr a
—Dominus 17:01, 4 November 2008 (UTC) —Dominus (talk) 15:15, 15 December 2008 (UTC)