I read up “Center for Neighborhood Technology” on Wikipedia and found that it was the only page that talked about this organization.. This is something we have briefly talked about in class, but not too in-depth on this specific organization. More like non-profits that are similar in their cause. The way the article is laid out is almost as if it was pulled form a textbook. There are no real world examples of how this organization has helped better the community. When we talked about non-profits that are comparable in class, the conversation was centered on a real like example.

The page could be taken as a credible source for the organization, mainly because there are citations, linked news articles about the organizations progress and photos. There is one article referenced at the very bottom of the page under references, but is not cited anywhere on the page. There are various grammatical errors, but that can be easily fixed.. The viewpoints on this page are very underrepresented, and can be further expanded. Overall, the tone of the page is neutral, because it is meant to be more scholarly as opposed to being opinionated.

Center for Neighborhood Technology