I would like to have oversight capabilities because I'm trying to take over Wikipedia. My first, to become an administrator, was successful. My second, to become a bureaucrat, has failed twice. I like the oversight bit so that I can hide any evidence of those RfBs and use the resultant "but didn't he..."-type confusion to ride a third first attempted RfB to completion.

Cue maniacal laughter. EVula // talk // // 15:29, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Support - I like coups. Wisdom89 (T / C) 15:33, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Beat-the-cabal support GracenotesT § 15:34, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Die in hell The cabal declares you a terrorist and will soon quietly remove all evidence of your existance. -- Escape Artist Swyer Talk to me Articles touched by my noodly appendage 15:43, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
    ...something I could help with if I had oversight abilities. See, this could be a win-win! EVula // talk // // 15:48, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Maybe you should run for Jimboship. Useight (talk) 15:49, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Hiding your RfBs sounds like a great idea. Would you mind removing my three whilst your at it? Thanks! :) Majorly (talk) 15:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete, non-notable. Anthøny 16:02, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  • I support this evil reptilian kitten-eater from another planet. Kingturtle (talk) 16:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Great choice for oversightship. Acalamari Bellatrix! 17:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  •  
    Thank you very MUCH for this opportunity to use an image I'd even use in my sig if I could even though I normally do nothing pointless or trollish (and not an atheist either; point?) and couldn't think of a damned darned thing to do for A[g]F day. Athaenara 17:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  1. Merge and redirect - per above. Tiptoety talk 18:58, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  2. ÜβЄЯ ŞÛρρʘŖ† per nom. LaraLove 19:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Promote to featured article and then delete as per normal policy. Mazca (talk) 21:33, 1 April 2008 (UTC)