Talk:Bernhard Moritz Carl Ludwig Riedel#Sections
Featured Article: 'Bone Wars' - Use of objective and factual terms and phrases; no bias towards either Cope or Marsh in relation to who 'won' the wars, discussion of personal disputes is objective - Images have good explanatory caption, spread out evenly across the article to assist with textual understanding - In depth discussion (while also being concise) - Titles were chronologically ordered (appropriate for a historical piece) - Full historical account of the Bone Wars (including a 'Background', 'Personal Dispute' section etc.) and not just description of the actual 'War' itself - Each section is consistent in length (no one section is much more dense than the others)
Week 6
Activity 1;
visual editing https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ahiyapur&action=history
source editing https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2019_Chicago_Cubs_season&action=history
Week 7
Featured Article; "Don't Stop the Music" (Rihanna song) Don't Stop the Music (Rihanna song)
Source: The Guardian: "Rihanna and Michael Jackson sued by African singer" https://www.theguardian.com/music/2009/feb/04/rihanna-michael-jackson-manu-dibango?INTCMP=SRCH
- The source as a newspaper article (The Guardian) hinders its reliability, however, tone is unbiased.
- The source has produced a wide array of articles, increasing its verifiability.
- Publication date of article is within two years of song release, increasing relevancy.
- Source (especially statistics) is not cited at all, impacting reliability.
- Very short and absent of any detailed information.
- This source supports the article in that it provides information regarding the lawsuit. It is only cited once (for a quote) and is therefore not a major source used in the article's construction.
Week 10: Peer Review activity
Good article: Adelaide
- Great layout, nice lead and detailed contents page
- Info box is extremely helpful and provides a great snapshot of the demographics of Adelaide
- Written in a concise and detailed manner, and presented in a factual, encyclopaedic manner
- Extensive reference list from mostly reliable sources
- Well in line with the WikiProject cities and the template layouts
- Well documented, supported by factual information and reflects expert knowledge
- To a large extent stable, however, in regards to education, values, arts, entertainment and media, information is subject to regular changes
Bad article: Aalten
- Great info box in line with Wikiproject (demographic stats etc.)
- Decent media choices
- Information disjointed and irrelevant to the purpose of the article and WikiProject cities (not much information on the village itself)
- Lacking content for each heading
- Sufficient amount of sources, however, the relevance of each source is limited
- Links to pages that need to be created
- Writing style is unbiased and neutral
- Too specific in its coverage (as opposed to broad)