Autism assessment

Assessment criteria

edit

Assessment of autism spectrum-related articles:

  • Importance
    • Top = Core article or primary definition; central autism concept/person or necessary for basic coverage of the topic (e.g.; autism spectrum disorder, Hans Asperger)
    • High = Core daughter article (per WP:MEDMOS sections) or significant related definition/person, hard to write the article comprehensively and NPOV without this article, enjoys widespread notability and consensus (e.g.; Causes of autism, Uta Frith)
    • Mid = Daughter article or broad/basic definition, important for comprehensive coverage of the top issues, but not an integral definition or WP:MEDMOS component (e.g.; EQ SQ theory, Simon Baron-Cohen)
    • Low = Non-core, the topic could be covered without this article
  • Quality
    • Has attained FA
    • A-class or could attain with a bit of work
    • GA-class or could attain GA with a bit of work
    • B-equivalent, mostly cited and accurate, but has some issues, could be citations, OR, POV, or incomprehensive. Not too much work needed to bring to decent standard, but may still be a stub or start.
    • Some cleanup/work needed, below B-class, has some issues like lack of citations, OR, POV, incomprehensive. Sustained attention needed to bring to standard.
    • More work needed, multiple issues such as uncited, essay, POV, dubious accuracy or questionable notability. Lots of attention needed.

Assessment table

edit
Autism
articles
Importance
Top High Mid Low
Quality
FA A B C D
almost
ready for A
E F G H
almost
ready for GA
I J K L
B-equiv. M N O P
Some

cleanup
needed

Q R S T
More work

needed:
Uncited,
essay,
notability,
or POV

U V W X

Templates, categories, and portals

edit