User:Franamax/Ucontribs-2009

Guide to interpretation

First of all, beware of editcountitis! Number of edits is not the same as quality of edits. However, the distribution of edits can give some clues as to where the editor's interests lie.
Edits to a space and its associated talkspace are deliberately mashed together. This follows my theory that discussion is just as important as action, especially in the mainspace and also in many parts of the project (WP) space. Userspace is quite different, most uspace edits will be to the editor's own page(s) but user talk edits may be informative.
"Career" edits are reported, as are "recent" edits (last 300 days here). This gives a look at how the editor has participated since they joined the project and what they have been doing recently. Key points to look for here are shifts in focus (from article writing to projectspace contributions say) and slowdowns (or speedups) in participation in general.
"Page family" reports can give an idea of where the editor concentrates their attention. Many other edit-listing tools will highlight "most-edited" pages, but this is the only one I know of which can group together participation in various project areas. Two examples which spring to mind are WP:AFD and WP:MILHIST, but if you examine each editor you will find a wide variety of interests.
New to this version of the tool is a line at the bottom of each listing showing the percentage of edits and pages represented in the data. This gives an idea of how concentrated the editor has been in their work.
And finally, remember that on-wiki edits do not represent the sum total of any editor's contributions to the project. Much work is conducted off-line, such as formal mediation, admin actions and ArbCom work for the arbs. Don't take this as the full picture! Franamax (talk) 03:31, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Implementation notes

This page contains output from version 0.3c of the uContribs program. Some notes for interpretation:

Beware of editcountitis! Counting number of edits gives no insight into whether the editor has actually made a contribution. Counting edits can however give some insight into where the editors interests lie in general terms.
The mainspace summaries here show the current status of the article (FA/GA/etc.) - but just because the editor has made many edits to the article does not mean that they were responsible for getting the article to its current rating.
Data is listed two different ways here:
- The Career summary counts every contribution this editor has made (deleted edits excluded) and sorts by the combined total of article and talk edits. The career listing includes the "recent" edit count.
- The "Recent" summary sorts the listing by recent edits, but still shows the career total edits. Recent is usually defined as 300 days-worth of edits.
- Recent can be used to look at the editor's current interests. Career gives a look at everything they've been interested in since they started editing.
Wikipedia- and user-space summaries have an additional section for "page families". A page family is defined as the summation of any page and all of its sub-pages (if there is a "/" in the pagename, the family name is the text before the first "/"). The page family summary shows (in brackets) the total number of pages within the family. Not all of these will be shown in the detail display if a detail cutoff is reached.
History scans for highly active editors can cause internal table overflows, which are noted either in the "small print" or within detail tables. In the case of an overflow, the most recent pages will be listed, and all edits to that page will be listed. The current limits are 8,000 pages, 800 page families, and 2,000 pages within a family. Thanks to various editors for consistently breaking the previously set limits!
Start date and total edits come from soxred93 and do not include deleted edits.
This program is in intermittent development - if you spot any discrepancies in the data or presentation, please bring them to my attention! (Of course my software is always perfect the first time I write it, so I'm sure it's someone else's fault - but I'd still like to know ;) Franamax (talk) 07:47, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom 2009 Candidates

ArbCom candidate listings use a uniform 300-day cutoff as the "recent" parameter and start counting back from 01 November 2009. This is to prevent the "recent" summaries from being affected by the current election and any possible aftermath from the previous one.

First	GT Eds	Candidate	Mainspc Career	Mainspc Recent	WPspc Career	WPspc Recent	Uspc Career	Uspc Recent
2006-02	19451	AGK	2765	269	7933	1013	7306	925
2006-01	27539	Cla68	20264	5599	3892	888	2755	762
2003-05	11195	Coren	1656	86	4311	964	4899	504
2002-11	23541	Fred Bauder	6293	1012	12640	61	4107	932
2007-04	12237	Fritzpoll	3746	675	2821	1505	4630	964
2006-12	24865	Hersfold	4413	563	6984	1320	11807	3590
2005-03	26007	Jehochman	5936	889	10913	2077	8306	1434
2005-06	59957	Kirill Lokshin	16060	384	25472	3777	6488	388
2004-05	6364	Kmweber	3464	5	1227	0	1227	3
2006-03	11780	KnightLago	5807	642	1978	513	3620	611
2004-11	48509	Mailer diablo	14904	729	26557	629	6006	534
2007-07	52610	MBK004	35137	11220	3790	1906	11545	3754
2006-02	14312	RMHED	10196	994	2321	183	1307	140
2006-03	18930	Ruslik0	12007	4608	3445	1800	1536	815
2005-08	27443	Secret *	14575	223	8763	265	3410	69
2006-11	5512	Seddon	1902	182	1488	415	1943	350
2005-06	27179	Shell Kinney	13649	794	5266	457	7340	561
2006-02	7385	SirFozzie	1796	144	2410	241	3081	217
2007-02	17607	Steve Smith	10093	2198	3304	811	3153	739
2009-03	1326	Unomi	499	499	410	410	224	224
2005-09	28937	Wehwalt	20013	7063	5335	3171	2339	1627
2003-02	36517	William M. Connolley	20411	2298	5380	1507	10240	3019
2007-09	6543	Xavexgoem	2694	788	2170	733	1379	282

User:Secret includes figures for User:Jaranda

Sitting Arbitrators

Arbitrator listings use a uniform 300-day cutoff as the "recent" parameter and start counting back from 01 November 2009.

Tranches are shown as best I can read this, corrections are welcome. Tranche Gamma is currently being replaced. Tranche Beta was elected last year (other tranches were topped up last year too). Tranche Alpha will be replaced next year. The latest state of play can be seen at the AC History page. Tranches may be eliminated as of this election.

First	GT Eds	Candidate	Mainspc Career	Mainspc Recent	WPspc Career	WPspc Recent	Uspc Career	Uspc Recent	Tranche
2005-01	48986	Carcharoth	16817	747	19435	2851	9714	654	Alpha
2004-02	13615	Cool Hand Luke *	7212	526	3728	994	1905	431	Beta
2003-05	11195	Coren	1660	88	4311	964	4898	504	Gamma
2005-04	41092	FayssalF *	26479	1706	5770	1063	7019	465	Alpha
2005-10	13230	FloNight	3625	289	5812	1425	3572	302	Gamma
2004-09	40580	John Vandenberg	19591	4496	12997	1608	6698	1770	Beta**
2006-02	23516	Newyorkbrad	3169	232	12605	1806	7280	495	Alpha
2005-12	12833	Risker	5056	373	3424	1210	4161	649	Beta
2005-11	75009	Rlevse	31891	5941	15527	2339	21004	3902	Beta
2005-09	23669	Roger Davies	8682	498	8033	2640	6186	1089	Beta
2004-08	11966	Stephen Bain	5868	330	3589	256	2018	94	Gamma
2005-10	13277	Vassyana	4766	482	4634	1134	3658	453	Alpha
2006-03	78286	Wizardman	42173	18773	12769	3599	4494	583	Alpha

* Currently marked as inactive (18Nov2009).
** Self-limited to a 2-year term.

Other Listings

These listings will have various different parameters. My own listing (User:Franamax) for example, uses a 120-day recent cutoff due to my pitiful overall history. The day-cutoff is shown in the "Rec Days" column.

Generally, none of these listings will have a "best-before" date, they start counting back from the second they are run.

If you'd like to see your own stellar record dissected for all to see, drop a note on the talk page.

First	GT Edits	Editor	Mainspc Career	Mainspc Recent	Uspc Career	Uspc Recent	WPspc Career	WPspc Recent	Rec Days	Run Date
2006-05	60560	Casliber	39741	7785	7908	1992	10292	3271	300	24Nov09
2007-08	11695	Franamax	5318	1876	2671	769	3365	1059	300	24Nov09
2008-01	14041	MichaelQSchmidt	3715	2629	4288	2722	5539	3368	300	20Nov09
2008-01	--	MichaelQSchmidt	--	--	--	--	--	--	200	10Mar10