Just starting this. Don't criticize. I'm only 17, but I have a right to correct any mistakes that I have noticed. I will (I promise) only make minor corrections, since the entire formatting is still a mystery to me. I will not, therefore, try to make any major changes, whether it be formatting or major information on the article itself. However, since I am a bit nitpicky, I'll most likely correct something if it is spelled wrong or is calculated incorrectly or has the wrong dates. I am writing this to promise that I will maintain my humility as a "newbie" and refrain from screwing up your articles. Thank you for your wonderful contributions that have taught me so much. I will try to repay the favor.
I've suddenly found myself completely engrossed in information on the Tudor dynasty and how it got its start. I seem to be most interested in the family lineage. Just the other day, I had about 15 tabs open trying to figure out family relationships in that dynasty. It seemed that any part of English history that I immersed myself in wound up right back at the Tudors. I wished to find out more about this dynasty, so I continued my search. During this search, I've glanced over the discussion pages. Most of the discussions there are absolute nonsense, yet some have pointed out several errors that I have noticed, as well. I'm going to continue my research on the Tudor dynasty, but I figured that while I'm looking, I might as well correct any errors that I see, just for the sake of later readers. I've created this profile to put a name with the comments. Hopefully, I won't be a nuisance.
--GeorgiaWillow (talk) 06:40, 29 December 2009 (UTC) Merv ♥