 | The Wikimedia Foundation's book rendering service has been withdrawn. Please upload your Wikipedia book to one of the external rendering services. |
 | You can still create and edit a book design using the Book Creator and upload it to an external rendering service:
|
| This user book is a user-generated collection of Wikipedia articles that can be easily saved, rendered electronically, and ordered as a printed book. If you are the creator of this book and need help, see Help:Books (general tips) and WikiProject Wikipedia-Books (questions and assistance). Edit this book: Book Creator · Wikitext Order a printed copy from: PediaPress [ About ] [ Advanced ] [ FAQ ] [ Feedback ] [ Help ] [ WikiProject ] [ Recent Changes ] | ||||||||
| WildBot has found potential problems with this book. Please check the talk page for a detailed explanation of what these might be and how to fix them. When these are resolved, you can remove |wildbot=yes from this template. |
Contract Law
edit- Adams v Lindsell
- Assignment (law)
- Audi alteram partem
- Baird Textile Holdings Ltd v Marks & Spencer plc
- Balfour v Balfour
- Banque Bruxelles Lambert SA v Eagle Star Insurance Co Ltd
- Bell v Lever Brothers Ltd
- Blackpool & Fylde Aero Club v Blackpool Borough Council
- Breach of contract
- Butler Machine Tool Co Ltd v Ex-Cell-O Corp Ltd
- Capacity (law)
- Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company
- Carter v Boehm
- Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd
- Collateral contract
- Common law
- Consideration
- Consideration under English law
- Consumer Protection (Distance Selling) Regulations 2000
- Contra proferentem
- Contract
- Contractual term
- Contractual terms in English law
- Da Costa v Jones
- Donoghue v Stevenson
- Duress (contract law)
- Duress in English law
- English contract law
- Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corporation
- Equity (law)
- Estoppel
- Felthouse v Bindley
- Fisher v Bell
- Foakes v Beer
- Frustration of purpose
- Hadley v Baxendale
- Harvey v. Facey
- Henthorn v Fraser
- Hillas and Co Ltd v Arcos Ltd
- Hochster v De La Tour
- Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co Ltd v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd
- Hughes v Metropolitan Railway Co
- Hyde v Wrench
- Impossibility
- Invitation to treat
- Johnson v Agnew
- Jones v Padavatton
- Krell v Henry
- L'Estrange v F Graucob Ltd
- Misrepresentation
- Mistake (contract law)
- Mistake in English law
- Offer and acceptance
- Parol evidence rule
- Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd
- Pillans v Van Mierop
- Pinnel's Case
- Postal rule
- Privity of contract
- Quasi-contract
- Raffles v Wichelhaus
- Rearden Smith Lines Ltd v Yngvar Hansen Tangan
- Royal Prerogative
- Sale of Goods Act 1979
- Smith v Hughes
- Specific performance
- Spencer v Harding
- Statute of frauds
- Statutory law
- Stevenson, Jacques & Co v McLean
- Suisse Atlantique Societe d'Armament SA v NV Rotterdamsche Kolen Centrale
- Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982
- Taylor v Caldwell
- The Moorcock
- Tweddle v Atkinson
- Ultra vires
- Unconscionability
- Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977
- Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999
- Void (law)
- Williams v Roffey Bros & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd