User:Hawa-Ave/Holographic Concept of Reality

Holographic Concept of Reality

The holographic model [or: concept] of reality is a theory which states that all the objects we can observe are three-dimensional images formed of standing and moving waves by electromagnetic and nuclear processes. Thus, it theorizes that all the objects of our world are three-dimensional images formed electro-magnetically, i.e., holograms.

The Holographic Concept of Reality theory is of interest because this concept, and the models of human information processing based on the hologram, throw interesting light on the philosophical tradition which holds that the world of objects is an illusion.

The Holographic Concept of Reality theory gains importance because, with the triumph of relativity and quantum physics, the interpenetration of the philosophical and the scientific is possible. In particular, the holographic model of reality emerging from this principle may provide a scientific explanation of psychoenergetic phenomena.

One of the earliest statements about the Holographic Concept of Reality is this: The pattern or organization of any biological system is established by a complex electrodynamic field, which is in part determined by its atomic physiochemical components and which in part determines the behavior and orientation of those components. This field is electrical in the physical sense, and by its properties it relates the entities of the biological system in a characteristic pattern and is itself in part a result of the existence of those entities. It determines and is determined by the components. More than establishing pattern it must maintain pattern in the midst of physiochemical flux; therefore it must regulate and control living things. It must be the mechanism, the outcome of whose activity is wholeness, organization and continuity. The electrodynamic field then, is comparable to the entelecy of Driesh, the embryonic field of Spehmann, and the biological field of Weiss. [Burr, H.S., and Northrop, F.S.C. The electrodynamic theory of life. Quarterly Review of Biology, 1935, 10, 322-333.]

Explanation and Discussion

“Something” appears to emerge from virtually “nothing” which physicists have come to describe as a sea of infinite potential. They call it quantum foam, vacuum potential, or zero-point energy – we can call it the vacuum substructure. Subatomic particles wink in and out of existence on a continuous basis, like some subatomic froth. This “something” appears paradoxically in wave/particle form. This world is not transcendent to matter, but underlies it as a coherent unity, much like ecology underlies biology.

Within this context, some physicists (Miller, 1975; Bohm, 1980) have strongly suggested that the nature of reality is fundamentally analogous to that of a holographic projection. Holograms contain many dimensions of information in far less, like a compressed file. They hold that information in a subtle network of interacting frequencies. Thus, shining a coherent light (reference beam) or laser through the fuzzy-looking overlapping waves of a 2-dimensional hologram can create a virtual image of a 3-dimensional figure.

The optical process called holography uses interference patterns. Holography describes transformations of light and optical information mathematically in wave mechanical terms. The superposition of a split beam of laser light led to the laboratory development of holograms, or recordable holographic images demonstrated by Dennis Gabor beginning in 1949. In 1971, Karl Pribram applied this metaphor to neuropsychology, suggesting it was more than analogy, that the brain actually encodes information as holograms. The pattern holds the form.

The gist of the holographic paradigm is that there is a more fundamental reality. There is an invisible flux not comprised of parts, but an inseparable interconnectedness. The holographic paradigm is one of reciprocal enfolding and unfolding of patterns of information. All potential information about the universe is holographically encoded in the spectrum of frequency patterns constantly bombarding us.

In this dynamic model there are no “things”, just energetic events. This “holoflux” includes the ultimately flowing nature of what is, and all possible forms. All the objects of our world are three-dimensional images formed of standing and moving waves by electromagnetic and nuclear processes. This is the guiding matrix for self-assembly, and manipulating and organizing physical reality.

Criss-crossing patterns occur when two or more waves ripple through each other. In the transactional interpretation of quantum physics, waves of probability originate in the past, present, and future. Events manifest when waves from past and future interfere with each other in the present. That pattern creates matter and energy. The universe emerges from the rippling effects of immense numbers of criss-crossing interference waves. The geometry of the fields is more fundamental than the fields or emergent particles themselves.

Our brains mathematically construct ‘concrete’ reality by interpreting frequencies from another dimension. This information realm of meaningful, patterned primary reality transcends time and space. Thus, the brain is an embedded hologram, interpreting a holographic universe. All existence consists of embedded holograms within holograms and their interrelatedness somehow gives rise to our existence and sensory images.

Interference patterns of waves can be visualized interacting like ripples on a pond. At the quantum level they create matter and energy as we perceive them – lifelike 3-dimenional effects. Consciousness and matter share the same essence, differing by degrees of subtlety or density. There is a strong correlation between modulations of the brain’s EM field and consciousness (Persinger,1987; McFadden, 2002). The universe is a continuously evolving, interactively dynamic hologram.

This “Holographic Concept of Reality” was first suggested by Miller, Webb, and Dickson in 1973, and later touted by David Bohm (1980), Ken Wilber (1982), Karl Pribram (1991), Michael Talbot (1991), and others. In this holistic theory, the Universe is considered as one dynamic holomovement – a grand Unity.

The part is not only contained within the whole, the whole is contained in every part, only in lower resolution. So, following the axiom of “As Above; So Below” we can expect biology to be based on the same physical foundation of creation. Miller and Webb hypothesized precisely this in “Embryonic Holography,” also in 1973. At the time, of course, such notions were untestable. But, with continuing revolutions in technology, now we are closer to modeling and demonstrating this creative process. [The above is excerpted from: FROM HELIX TO HOLOGRAM (50 Years of DNA Research), Nexus Magazine, April 2003.]

Possible Applications in Biophysics

It has been proposed that humans are more fundamentally electromagnetic, rather than chemical beings. DNA is not the driver of evolution but even more fundamental quantum mechanical symmetry-breaking forces [King, 2003].

It has also been proposed that the DNA of living beings is actually a holographic projector, or a biocomputer [The Gariaev group (1994)], wherein the code is transformed into physical matter guided by light and sound signals.

References

• Berezin, A.A., Gariaev, P.P., et al (1996), "Is it possible to create laser based on information biomacromolecules?", Laser Physics, v.6, N6, pp. 1211-1213.
• Bohm, David (1980) Wholeness and the Implicate Order, Routledge, London.
• Copley, Jon (2003). “Proof of Life”. New Scientist. Vol. 177, No. 2383, pp. 28-31, Feb. 22, 2003.
• Gariaev, Peter, Boris Birshtein, Alexander Iarochenko, et al, “The DNA-wave Biocomputer,”
• Gariaev, P.P. (1994), Wave Genome, Public Profit, Moscow, 279 pages [in Russian].
• Gariaev, P.P. (1993) Wave based genome, Depp. VINITI 15:12. 1993, N 3092?93, 278pp. [in Russian].
• Gariaev, P., Tertinshny, G., and Leonova, K. (2001), "The Wave, Probabilistic and Linguistic Representations of Cancer and HIV," JNLRMI, v.1, No.2.
• Hoyle, F., (1981). The relation of biology to astronomy (University College Cardiff Press).
• Hoyle, F. and Wickramasinghe, N.C., (1981). In Comets and the Origin of Life (ed. C. Ponnamperuma) pp 227-239 (D. Reidel)
• Hoyle, F. and Wickramasinghe, N.C., (1985). Living Comets (University College, Cardiff Press)
• Hoyle, F. & Wickramasinghe, N.C., (2000). Astronomical Origins of Life: Steps towards Panspermia. Kluwer Academic Press.
• Kelleher, Colm A. (1999), “Retrotransposons as Engines of Human Bodily Transformation,” Journal of Scientific Exploration, 13, no 1, Spring 1999, pp. 9-24.
• King, Chris (1999). “Fractal Neurodynamics and Quantum Chaos: Resolving the Mind-Brain Paradox Though Novel Biophysics,” Fractals of Brain; Fractals of Mind, Advances in Consciousness Research 7. HYPERLINK "http://www.dhushara.com/book/paps/consc/brcons1.htm#anchor217145" http://www.dhushara.com/book/paps/consc/brcons1.htm#anchor217145

• King, Chris (2003). “Biocosmology” . http://www.dhushara.com/book/biocos/biocos.pdf
• Lawton, Graham (2003). “Live Wire,” New Scientist. Vol. 117, No. 2386., March 15, 2003, pp.38-39.
• Marcer, P. and Schempp, W. (1996). “A Mathematically Specified Template for DNA and the Genetic Code, in Terms of the Physically Realizable Processes of Quantum Holography” Proceedings of the Greenwich Symposium on Living Computers, editors Fedorec, A. and Marcer, P., 45-62.
• Marcer, P. and Schempp, W. (1997a), The Model of the Prokaryote Cell as an Anticipatory System Working by Quantum Holography, Proceedings of CASYS 97, 11-15, August, HEC-Liege, Belgium, International Journal of Computing Anticipatory Systems, v2, 307-315.
• Maslov, M.U. and Gariaev, P.P. (1994), Fractal Presentation of Natural Language Texts and Genetic Code, 2nd Intl Conference on Quantitative Linguistics, Sept. 20-24, Moscow State University, Philological Faculty, pp. 193-194.
• McFadden, Johnjoe (2002), “Synchronous Firing and Its Influence on the Brain’s Electromagnetic Field: Evidence for an Electromagnetic Field Theory of Consciousness,” (CEMI Theory), Journal of Consciousness Studies (2002) 9: 23-50.
• Miller, R.A., Webb, B. Dickson, D. (1975), “A Holographic Concept of Reality,” Psychoenergetic Systems Journal Vol. 1, 1975. 55-62. Gordon & Breach Science Publishers Ltd., Great Britain; reprinted in the hardback book Psychoenergetic Systems, Stanley Krippner, editor. 1979. 231-237. Gordon & Breach, New York, London, Paris; again in the journal Psychedelic Monographs and Essays, Vol. 5, 1992. 93-111. Boynton Beach, FL, Tom Lyttle, Editor. Also in JNLRMI 2002 at emergentmind.org
• Miller, R. A., Webb. B., “Embryonic Holography,” Psychoenergetic Systems, Stanley Krippner, Ed. Presented at the Omniversal Symposium, California State College at Sonoma, Saturday, September 29, 1973. Reprinted in Lyttle's journal Psychedelic Monographs and Essays, Vol. 6, 1993. 137-156. Also in JNLRMI 2003 at emergentmind.org
• Miller, R.A. (1974), "Bioluminescence, Kirlian Photography and Medical Diagnostics"; Mankind Research Unlimited, a formerly unpublished, proprietary paper.
• Miller, R. A. and Iona Miller (2002). Quantum Bioholography: A Review of the Field from 1973-2002. JNLRMI, Oct. 2002.
• Miller, Iona (1993), “The Holographic Paradigm and the Consciousness Restructuring Process,” Chaosophy ‘93, O.A.K., Grants Pass.
• Miller, S.L., and Robertson, M.P. (1995). “An efficient prebiotic synthesis of cytosine and uracil,” Nature, 375, 772.
• Patel, A. (2000), Quantum Algorithms and the Genetic Code, Proceedings of the Winter Institute of Quantum Theory and Quantum Optics, 1-13 January, S.N. Bose National Centre for Basic Sciences, Calcutta, India.
• Persinger, Michael A (1987), Neuropsychological Bases of God Beliefs, Praeger Publishers, New York.
• Poole, A.M., Jeffares, D.C. and Penny, D. (1998). “The path from the RNA world,” Journal of Molecular Evolution, 46, 1.
• Poponin, Vladimir, “The DNA Phantom Effect: Direct Measurement of A New Field in the Vacuum Substructure.”
• Presman (1970), Electromagnetic Fields and Life. New York: Plenum.
• Pribram, Karl (1971), Languages of the Brain, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs: New Jersey.
• Pribram, Karl (1991), Brain and Perception: Holonomy and Structure in Figural Processing, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Hilldale: New Jersey.
• Pullman and Pullman (1963), Quantum Biochemistry, New York: Interscience, 1963. .
• Rossi, E. (2000-2002), “Exploring Gene Expression in Sleep, Dreams & Hypnosis with the New DNA Microarray Technology.”
• Rossi, E. and Lippincott, B.M., “The Wave Nature of Being: Ultradian Rhythms and Mind-Body Communication.
• Rossi, E., “Psyche, Soma and Gene Expression”
• Rossi, E. (2002). The Psychobiology of Gene Expression: Neuroscience and Neurogenesis in Hypnosis and the Healing Arts. New York: W.W. Norton Professional Books.
• Schempp, W. (1992), "Quantum Holography and Neurocomputer Architectures", Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 2, 279-326.
• Schempp, W. (1993) "Bohr’s Indeterminacy Principle in Quantum Holography, Self-Adaptive Neural Network Architectures, Cortical Self-organization, Molecular Computers, Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Solitonic Nanotechnology", Nanobiology 2, 109-164.
• Shcheglov, V.A., Gariaev, P.P. (1996) Lazer-lazer interactions and phantom effects in genetic structures. “Science on the threshold XXI age – New Paradigms” [in Russian].
• Sidorov, L. (2002), The Journal of Non-Locality and Remote Mental Interactions, online at http://www.emergentmind.org.
• Szent-Gyorgyi (1957), Bioenergetics. New York: Academic Press.
• Szent-Gyorgyi (1960), Introduction to a Submolecular Biology. New York: Academic Press.
• Talbot, Michael (1991), The Holographic Universe, Harper Collins Publishers, New York.
• Wilber, Ken (1982), The Holographic Paradigm, Boulder: Shambhalla.

External links

• Holographic Paradigm
• Touchable Holograms, a recent application of this theory
• Video explaining the Holographic Concept of Reality
• Holographic Concept of Reality explained in video