User:IntelligentComputer article drafts
Reason for supporting seed documents on Stored Purpose machine intelligence
edit- To ensure there is at least one encyclopedic reference that provides broad coverage in a neutral tone to the broader community.
- There are many scientific, social, philosophical considerations with regard to new machine science technology that need proper debate. Papers describing the scientific details will not be widely read and it is extremely unlikely that government, citizens and businesses will effectively and proactively discover and address significant regulatory and societal issues without access to an OPEN encyclopedic reference that exposes the public to all potential topics of concern.
The traditional means for communicating new technology is Marketing. While Marketing is important to any company, it will provide only a well crafted and filtered message.
It is important that all information of merit be published in an encyclopedic format not controlled by any one person or company.
Publishing Guidelines
edit- We will focus on the science and related issues, supporting encyclopedic coverage of objective topics of public and scientific interest related to stored purpose machine intelligence
- We will support discussion on all sides of each issue, our goal is safe intelligent systems
- We will not publish articles that describe "products" sold by the company or it's partners. There is not and never will be a "Stored Purpose" computer product any more than there was a "stored program" computer. Stored purpose is a design, as is the existence model architecture, multilevel intelligent cellular architecture, platonic form, purpose hypergraph, general intelligence algorithm.
- if you are disappointed by an inability to read a product description, or think Wikipedia is not widely used as a forum for publishing product information, try these articles ... ipod, iphone, ipad, imac, macbook, wii, Ginsu_knife, Mister Coffee, Sharpie (marker), chia pet, bud light
Full Articles
editBig edits with multiple Contributors
edit- Insert User:IntelligentComputer/Metaknowledge in metaknowledge replacing main body text
- Note this is a full re-write with contributor content preserved.
- Current content has no citations and should be fixed or removed but will leave pending discussion.
Reason for Edits
- terrible stub, no citations, poorly written ... i.e. "Put simpler, metaknowledge may be linked to..."
- current article reflects poorly on all encyclopedic coverage of knowledge
Small edits to Articles
edit- User:IntelligentComputer/Existence at position
- insert before Dharmic "Middle way"
- Insert User:IntelligentComputer/Knowledge in knowledge at position
- after section Defining knowledge (philosophy)