Useful links: Mbox, Userbox, Web colors, Icons (gallery), UBX, MOS, EDIT, Magic words, Parser functions Image map (tool).
User:Ipatrol/Allegations of admin abuse
edit | The status of this task is writing. |
Every week, thousands of accounts are blocked and along with them, many hundreds of unblock requests are created. Some are coherent, others are plainly rediculous. A common theme among both types is that the admin was acting improperly. Good unblock requests often say something like "admin X was not uninvolved and therefore had no right to block me." Bad ones say things like "admin X is a rogue admin that ought to be banned forever." The latter complaints are discounted, but they create a larger problem on Wikipedia. Because so many allagations of admin abuse are unfounded, almost all admin complaints are discredited. Now, there is even a whole organization dedicated to mocking admin abuse allegations. Administrators must walk a tight balance of having immunity from frivolous complaints and hostilities, and having to enact the will of the community. Things change on Wikipedia so fast, somethimes things must be done that have never been done or discussed before (under the auspices of IAR) in order to prevent harm to Wikipedia. This ability to use the tools in ways never exactly discussed is called "admin discretion." The problem that can arise here lies in the simple question: how much discretion should admins have?