User:IvoShandor/Black Hawk War

Welcome. You have found the user collaboration page for the Black Hawk War of 1832. However you got here please feel free to contribute to the discussion on the talk page and to the ongoing work on this collaboration page. You can contact User:IvoShandor or User:Kranar drogin if you have any questions about where you can help out or you can just start by taking a look at the content below. (Hint: the two templates to the right are pretty useful if you're looking for something to do.)

Consider nominating any new articles you create that are over 1,500 characters in length at Did You Know?. You can read over the rules and process of nominating an article there if you are not familiar with them, or just ask Ivo. Categories important to the collaboration include Category:Black Hawk War and its subcategories. The collaboration's main article is Black Hawk War. Watch for a work space link on the template to the right.

WikiProjects related to this collaboration include:

These projects may be helpful resources for information and/or assistance.

Goals and tasks

edit
  • Goals
  1. Create and expand articles relating to the Black Hawk War of 1832.
  2. Raise all battle, massacre, skirmish, ambush etc. articles affiliated with the war to GA class.
  3. Raise the article Black Hawk War to FA class.
  4. Raise the topic Black Hawk War (main article along with battle articles) to the status of Featured topic.
  • Tasks
  • Current
  • Most wanted articles
Feel like creating something, try these. Creating an article listed here would fill out red links in several war related articles. Some of these have references compiled on the creations needed page, where you will also find other red links to choose from.

Participants

edit

If you are participating in the collaboration (even in small ways) feel free to list yourself in this section, in fact feel free to add to the page as you see fit. This list of participants will help facilitate communication.

  1. IvoShandor 20:09, 7 August 2007 (UTC): Main author, editor and sorter outer of historical discrepancies, photographer, (also disregarder of obviously exaggerated early history's claims)
  2. Kranar drogin 11:14, 8 August 2007 (UTC): Copyeditor, researcher, and rater of articles. I will work mostly on obscure villages, and people.
  3. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 12:25, 8 August 2007 (UTC) Maker of a map for the main article
  4. Rattis_irrittis User Talk =>> Rattis 13:58 16 August 2007 (UTC): Photographic on site research

Helpful people and places

edit

This is a listing of projects and people who aren't listed above or in the intro to the page who have been vastly helpful to the collaboration. Just a little note of recoginition. : )

  1. WikiProject Ships: information assistance for Warrior (steamship)
  2. Stevenj: has provided continuing outside perspective on main article
  3. Cricketgirl: has been stunningly meticulous on-call copy editor for the collaboration. Please note, she does not openly accept copy editing requests.

Free use image sources

edit

Major articles

edit
  • See the work space page for this article for further information about ongoing work.
  • Major issues
  • Not a single source.
  • Currently being worked on.
  • Sources
  • Completed
  1. Article Written
  2. DYK nom
  • Completed
  1. Created
  2. DYK nom
  3. Cricketgirl copy edit
  4. GA nom
  5. Failed GA
  • Completed
  1. Created
  2. Initial expansion
  3. Secondary expansion
  4. Nominated for GA
  5. Major revision/copy edit by outside editor.
  6. GA on hold, addressed issues
  7. GA passed.

Major issues

Sources

  • More sources-second expansion
  • Like this, purportedly at Buffalo Grove: An attempt was made on the 24 of June, by a considerable body of warriors, to surprise the fort at Buffalo Grove, ou Rock Hiver, only about 1ÍÍ miles to the northward of Dixon's Ferry. It was guarded by 150 militia, who were prepared to meet them, and a considerably sharp contest ensued. Sixteen of the Indians were killed before they retreated. But few of the whites were wounded. The garrison was in great fear of being cut off, having expended all their ammunition before a reinforcement arrived, which had been sent for while the attack was going on.
  • Completed
  1. Complete rewrite and referencing
  2. DYK nom and image added
  3. Secondary expansion/tweaks
  4. Nominated for GA
  5. Major revision/copy edit by outside editor
  6. Minor copy edits by GA reviewer
  7. Passed GA
  • Sources
  • Completed
  1. Created
  2. Secondary expansion
  3. Minor expansion
  4. Pre GA tweaks and copy edit
  5. Nominated for GA
  6. GA on hold, addressed review concerns
  7. Passed GA
  • Sources
  • Completed
  1. Initial expansion from stub.
  2. Second expansion.
  3. Tweaks and copy edit prior to GAC.
  4. Nominated for GA.
  5. Passed GA.
  • Sources
  • Related articles
  • Major issues
  • Copy edit.
  • Completed
  1. Initial referencing.
  2. Initial expansion.
  3. Finished referencing.
  4. Second expansion.
  5. Final tweaks prior to GAC.
  6. Nominated for GA.
  7. Passed GA.
  • Sources
  • Completed
  1. Created
  2. Initial expansion from stub
  3. Major tweaks prior to GA
  4. Nominated for GA
  5. Passed GA
  • Major issues
  • Sources
  • Completed
  1. Initial expansion
  2. Referencing
  3. Continuing expansion
  4. Two outside copy edits.
  5. Additions and tweaks by me per cedits.
  6. Nominated for GA.
  • Completed
  1. Initial referencing
  2. Expansion
  3. Copy edit and lead expansion
  4. Major issue resolved
  5. Nominated for GA
  6. Well illustrated
  • Sources
  • Hagan, William T. "General Henry Atkinson and the Militia," Military Affairs, Vol. 23, No. 4. (Winter, 1959-1960), pp. 194-197.
  • Dyar, Scott D. "Stillman's Run: Militia's Foulest Hour," Military History, March 2006, pp. 38-44, 72.
  • Lincoln at Stillman's Run (Sources)
  • Completed
  1. Created
  2. Initial expansion and DYK nom.
  3. Final tweaks prior to GA.
  4. Nominated for GA.
  5. Passed GA
  • Sources
  • Completed
  1. Initial expansion from stub
  2. Clarifications and expansions prior to GA.
  3. Nominated for GA. Put on hold.
  4. Work on GA Review, only a copy edit for grammar/flow left.
  5. Copy edit from LOCE
  6. Passed GA
  • Sources
  • Completed
  1. Initial research
  2. Created
  3. DYK nom
  4. Minor tweaks/expansion of Background
  5. Copy edit requested
  6. Request remains unfulfilled, GA nomination
  7. Outside copy edit complete
  8. Passed GA
  • Sources
  • Completed
  1. Creation
  2. DYK nom
  3. Secondary work, needs expansion, more sources
  4. Continued secondary work, relatively major expansion
  5. Copy edit requested
  6. Request remains unfulfilled, GA nomination
  7. Two outside copy edits
  8. Passed GA
  • Sources
  • Completed
  1. Initial expansion from stub
  2. Minor secondary expansion
  3. Continued secondary expansion
  4. Pre GA tweaks and copy edit
  5. Nominated for GA
  6. Passed GA
  • Sources
  • Completed
  1. Initial expansion from stub
  2. Subsequent expansion
  3. Major tweaks prior to GA
  4. GA nomination
  5. GA Pass
  • Major issues
  • The Little Bear incident described in several older histories may or may not have happened.
  • Issue resolved.
  • Sources

Other stuff

edit