User:Jackson Peebles/Adoption/PantherLeapord Exam 6
 | This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q2. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Western Michigan University/Wikipedia (2013 Q2)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
I thought that to test this section, I would ask a few broader, more basic questions, and then create a few pages as hypothetical scenarios. For the hypothetical scenarios, simply state what you'd do if you came across this article in mainspace.
- Broad questions
1.) Q- Explain a scenario in which you'd use PROD instead of sending an article to AfD.
- A- I come across an article that I am almost certain will not survive a deletion discussion yet does not unquestionably meet the speedy deletion criteria
- 4/5 A bit vague, but fair enough.
2.) Q- You tag an article for speedy deletion under criterion A7. The creator of the page then blanks it without an edit summary. What do you do?
- A- Tag it with Template:db-self due to the creator blanking the page.
- Yes
3.) Q- Why should you wait 10-15 minutes before tagging an article for CSD under criteria A1 or A3?
- A- To allow time for the article to be worked on
- Yes.
- Hypothetical scenarios
1.) Scenario I
- A- Tag with Template:db-a7
- That's the ideal option.
2.) Scenario II
- A- Obvious case for Template:db-a1
- Whatever works, I guess. I'd have used G1, but yours works perfectly well.
3.) Scenario III
- A- Try to find references or if that fails PROD it
- Either this or a nomination for deletion. Correct.
4.) Scenario IV
- A- No deletion is required for this article.
- Correct, this is notable and has sources. It could stand to be tagged and fixed, but its existence is acceptable.
Once you have finished, please notify me on my talk page, then proceed to Lesson 7: Copyright.
34/35 Good work! --Jackson Peebles (talk) 00:18, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
