Wikipedia has too many ignorant & intolerant half-wit editors whose personal views are more important than simple facts.
Previous problems revolved around Ignorant Edit Bullies. Now it's all completely political. Extremist nutjobs are taking over.
It seems that there's no way to fight it either. They Manipulate Wikipedia's Rules, say "No, I didn't", get one of their co-crybabies to agree, and that's the end of that.
I suggest you read wikipedia for the references only and completely disregard the articles because they are carefully tailored and censored to meet the author's point of view. See Emma Weyant revision history and the braindamage done. And just as important, don't consider the references complete. Lots of information/facts are censored and removed after a page is updated with valid/correct information -- so go through the revision history of pages as well.
Seriously, Look at the user pages of (check Emma's revision history) and then contemplate the real reason they are censoring certain content.
Edit: apparently there are rules against calling out bad editors. My webpage is below.
So there's my opinion. I'm not sure if my own talk page will be censored. but in case it is-- here's a link to what was written, content set in stone, that will be available on the internet forever (coming soon).
About
|
|
|
This user has a website, which can be found here.
|
|
Dad | This user is a father and proud of it! |
|
|
Operating Systems
|
|
| This user contributes using Solaris |
| This user contributes using Ubuntu. |
|
Code
|
vi_ | This user contributes using vi. |
|
Social
G | This user will use Google before asking dumb questions. |
|
| This user enjoys playing poker. |
|
TV
BrBa | This user is the one who knocks! |
|
BCS | This user likes wearing trendy-colored suits. |
|
|
M.D. | This user watches House. |
|
ST:TNG | This user knows Picard is better than Kirk, and has a list to prove it! |
|