A collection of phylogenetic trees for the caniform carnivores. The cladograms were copied from Wikipedia mainspace articles and used to test the Lua module version of the {{clade}} using the test template {{cladeN}}.
Note: "Recently, however, Schmidt-Kittler (1976; Chen & Schmidt-Kittler 1983) has demonstrated, on the basis of the structure of the deciduous dentition, that percrocutoids are likely to be phylogenetically quite distant from hyaenids sensu stricto, and instead share a common ancestry with
'stenoplesictines' (Chen & Schmidt-Kittler 1983, p. 168)." (Werdelin & Solounias, 1991, p5)
Werdelin , Lars & Solounias, Nikos 1991 05 31: The Hyaenidae: taxonomy, systematics and
evolution. Fossils and Strata, No. 30, pp. 1-104. Oslo. ISSN 0300-9491 . ISBN82-00-37481-5 .
From: Caniformia#Phylogeny Note redundancy with main carnivore scheme. Transcluded templates would be an improvement. I've added the canine subfamilies.
Cladogram showing the results of the recent molecular studies.[9][10][11] Genus Nasuella was not included in these studies, but in a separate study was found to nest within Nasua.[12]
^Wang, Xiaoming; Richard Tedford; Beryl Taylor (1999-11-17). "Phylogenetic systematics of the borophaginae". Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. 243. hdl:2246/1588.
^ abcWang, Xiaoming; Tedford, Richard H.; Dogs: Their Fossil Relatives and Evolutionary History. New York: Columbia University Press, 2008.
^ abR.M. Nowak (2003). "Chapter 9 - Wolf evolution and taxonomy". In Mech, L. David; Boitani, Luigi (eds.). Wolves: Behaviour, Ecology and Conservation. University of Chicago Press. pp. 239–258. ISBN978-0-226-51696-7.
^K.-P. Koepfli; M. E. Gompper; E. Eizirik; C.-C. Ho; L. Linden; J. E. Maldonado; R. K. Wayne (2007). "Phylogeny of the Procyonidae (Mammalia: Carvnivora): Molecules, morphology and the Great American Interchange". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 43 (3): 1076–1095. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2006.10.003. PMID17174109.
^Berta, A.; Churchill, M. (2012). "Pinniped taxonomy: Review of currently recognized species and subspecies, and evidence used for their description". Mammal Review. 42 (3): 207–34. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2907.2011.00193.x.