Initial drafts and queued sources of Rescuecom_Corp._v._Google_Inc. will appear here.
Notes
edit- Initial discussion of Rescuecom's case will require reference to the Lanham Act. [1]
- The article will, of course, include discussion of the district court's opinion [2], and the second circuit's vacation [3] of the district court ruling.
- The courts disagree as to the applicability of 1-800 CONTACTS, INC. v. WhenU. com, Inc. [4]. Exploring the second circuit's opinion requires brief discussion of this case.
- A number of blogs and news articles discuss the Rescuecom cases.[5][6][7][8] I expect their articles to inform the article, particularly with reference to the circuit court decision. In each instance I link here to a representative article discussing the case.
- Complete discussion of arguments made in this case will draw on the various briefs filed by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, AOL, Yahoo!, EBay, Public Citizen, various law professors and the original briefs filed by Google and Rescuecom.[5]
Sources
edit- ^ Title 15, Chapter 22 - Trademarks - United States Code
- ^ Rescuecom Corp. v. Google, Inc., 456 F. Supp. 2d 393 - United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, 2006
- ^ Rescuecom Corp. v. Google Inc., 562 F. 3d 123 - United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 2009
- ^ 1-800 CONTACTS, INC. v. WhenU. com, Inc., 414 F. 3d 400 - United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 2005
- ^ a b Eric Goldman's case brief on Rescuecom v. Google
- ^ Second Circuit Reverses Dismissal of Trademark Infringement Suit Against Google - Harvard Journal of Law and Technology
- ^ Google loses on appeal, will face AdWords trademark suit - Ars Technica
- ^ Bad Results for Google in Recent 2nd Circuit Ruling Over Keywords - The Wall Street Journal Law Blog