This is not a Wikipedia article: It is an individual user's work-in-progress page, and may be incomplete and/or unreliable. For guidance on developing this draft, see Wikipedia:So you made a userspace draft. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Rydberg atoms have at least one electron in an excited state with a very high principle quantum number [1]. Due to the high quantum numbers of the electrons, Rydberg atoms have some very remarkable properties. Perhaps the most important is the physical size of the resulting atom, due to the vast distance between the electron and atomic nucleus. This distance, which can be on the order of microns, creates a large dipole moment.[1]. These large dipole moments increase the sensitivity of the atom to outside electric fields, making them ideal candidates for a multitude of problems in physics and quantum information science. As a downside, this increased sensitivity makes the atoms responsive to stray electromagnetic fields in the lab[2]. It has been shown that Rydberg atoms have strong electrostatic interactions at longer ranges than are normally associated with neutral atoms, leading to advances in neutral atom quantum computing [2] [3][4][5][6][7].
When Rydberg atoms lay spatially close to each other, the electric dipole-dipole interaction can shift the energy levels of nearby atoms [2] The excitation of a single atom to a Rydberg state can “block” the excitation of large numbers of atoms surrounding it from absorbing radiation at the frequency of the incoming laser. This effect is known as the Rydberg Blockade.
Dipole Interaction
editThe dipole moment of a Rydberg atom can be written as
- ,
where is the elementary charge and r is its vector displacement with respect to the nucleus. Due to the very large distance between the valence electrons and the atomic nucleus, the dipole moment is an important characteristic of high quantum number Rydberg atoms[2]. For the case of two close-lying, but non-overlapping atoms, the resulting dipole-dipole interaction that will shift the energy of the system by
where R is the the interatomic distance, r1 is the component of r along the interatomic axis[2], and (1) and (2) indicate atom number 1 and 2[2]. We can see that the function is a function of the interatomic distance, so producing Rydberg atoms at the precise interatomic distance will be of utmost importance.
The total Hamiltonian of this two-atom system, omitting the fine and hyperfine structure, is
or, written in the quantum number basis,
Where is equal to and is known as the "quantum defect."[8]The quantum defect takes into account the fact that Rydberg electrons with small angular momenta have highly elliptical orbits that allow penetration into the core.[8]
The Blockade
editLets look at an atom with a ground state and a Rydberg state and an energy separation as shown in Figure 1 [6]. When atoms 1 and 2 do not interact, we get two transitions at the frequency . In other words, the state can go to or and eventually to . This allows excitation of both atoms to simultaneously [6]. However, if the two atoms interact, the energy level is shifted by an amount as described above, and the laser excitation can not bring the two atoms to state .
Let us now look at this interaction in more detail. Lets say that we have a neutral atom in the rotating frame coupled to a ryberg state, , by a laser with Rabi frequency from two possible ground states or and detuning [2]. After setting , let the Hamiltonian for this atom be
where is the hyperfine energy splitting[2]. Now, we want to write a total Hamiltonian for a system of two atoms. We know that the total hamiltonian can be written as a sum of the bare atom hamiltonian plus the interaction term. So, the total hamiltonian for this state can be written as
.
However, we know that the energy shift, , from the interaction between the two atoms interacts with the Rydberg state , and thus the total hamiltonian can be rewritten as
or in the expanded form
However, we know that an atom in states and doesn't feel the interaction term, and we will only need to deal with interactions involving
, and . In order to rewrite the total hamiltonian, we can assume a subspace where the atoms are in one of these states. [2] The total hamiltonian becomes
where is the hermetian conjugate.[2] As is common when talking about Electromagnetically Induced Transparency (EIT), we will introduce Bright and Dark states, and then rewrite the total hamiltonian to be in terms of the new Dark and Bright state basis.[9] While in a Dark state, atoms do not interact with the field, and thus do not absorb radiation at a typically expected frequency. A Bright state is the orthogonal counterpart to the Dark state.[9] Bright states , , and Dark states, are states for a typical 3-level atom configuration[9]. For our case, we can rewrite this in terms of our and basis states as and . Finally, we can write our total hamiltonian as
As we can see from this hamiltonian, the state is coupled to the Bright state and the Dark states can be ignored. However, we need to have a dark state somewhere or we couldn't get the Blockade effect. Also, notice how the Rabi frequency is enhanced by a factor of . Since this is a simplified Hamiltonian, there are some additional terms that would need to be added to get an entirely accurate picture. The Dark states are actually found in the errors of this Hamiltonian.[2]
If we make the assumption that the interaction term, , is much greater than , the transition from from the state to the state will be much more likely than the transition from the bright state, , to [2]. This process is conceptually shown in Figure 2.
Conceptually, when the first atom absorbs a photon it keeps the other atom from absorbing radiation at that same wavelength.
If one wanted to look at interactions involving more than two atoms, our analysis can be readily extended to include atomic ensembles of N atoms. Instead of two bare atom hamiltonians, out total hamiltonian will now include N "copies" of it, as well as a correction to the Rabi frequency that scales as .[2]
Applications
editMultiple Demonstrations of Rydberg Blockades and their applications have materialized over the years.
Some of the earlier demonstrations were in clouds of atomic gasses. [10][11][12] .
The Rydberg Blockade has been shown to have a significant importance to the field of quantum information processing. The dipole blockade was predicted by Lukin, et al In the year 2001 to be a good candidate for QIP.[7]In the year 2010, Isenhower et al. experimentally demonstrated that two individual neutral atoms could be used to create a Controlled-Not gate.
In 2009, a group at the University of Wisconsin Madison demonstrated experimentally that a single Rb atom excited to the energy level resulted in a blockade on the second atom with a separation distance of .[3] The authors of the paper say their experiment is an important step in demonstrating "scalable neutral atom quantum logic devices"[3].
In a 2017 paper published in PRL, a group demonstrated the entanglement of two different isotopes using a Rydberg Blockade.[5] They succeeded in entangling and isotopes confined in separate single atom traps by . They claim that their experiment "can be used for simulating any many--body system with multi-species interactions" [5]
The effect has also been experimentally demonstrated in a BEC.[13] A group at the Universität Stuttgart reported on a Blockade in BEC for multiple "excitation times" and "condensation temperatures."[13]
References
edit- ^ a b Gallagher, Thomas F. (1994). Rydberg Atoms. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-02166-9.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Keating, Tyler Emerson. "Quantum Information in Rydberg-Dressed Atoms." (2016) Dissertation Cite error: The named reference "Keating" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ a b c E. Urban, et al. "Observation of Rydberg blockade between two atoms". Nature Physics 5, 110–114 (2009) https://www.nature.com/articles/nphys1178
- ^ Y.-Y. Jau, et al. "Entangling atomic spins with a Rydberg-dressed spin-flip blockade" . Nature Physics 12, 71–74 (2016)https://www.nature.com/articles/nphys3487
- ^ a b c Yong Zeng, et al. "Entangling Two Individual Atoms of Different Isotopes via Rydberg Blockade"Rev. Lett. 119, 160502 – Published 18 October 2017https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.160502
- ^ a b c Gaëtan, Alpha; et al. (2009). "Observation of collective excitation of two individual atoms in the Rydberg blockade regime". Nature Physics. 5 (2): 115–118. doi:10.1038/nphys1183. ISSN 1745-2481.
{{cite journal}}
: Explicit use of et al. in:|last2=
(help) - ^ a b M. D. Lukin et al."Dipole Blockade and Quantum Information Processing in Mesoscopic Atomic Ensembles" Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 037901 ( 2001)
- ^ a b Samboy, Nolan. "Long-range Interactions Between Ultracold Rydberg Atoms and the Formation Properties of Long-range Rydberg Molecules." (2011) Dissertation
- ^ a b c Joseph Scholle "Electromagnetically Induced Transparency" (2014) Dissertation
- ^ Suppression of Excitation and Spectral Broadening Induced by Interactions in a Cold Gas of Rydberg Atoms Kilian Singer, et al. "Suppression of Excitation and Spectral Broadening Induced by Interactions in a Cold Gas of Rydberg Atoms" Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 163001 (2004)https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.163001
- ^ D. Tong, et al. "Local Blockade of Rydberg Excitation in an Ultracold Gas" Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 063001 "2004" https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.063001
- ^ K. Afrousheh, et al. "Spectroscopic Observation of Resonant Electric Dipole-Dipole Interactions between Cold Rydberg Atoms" Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 233001 (2004) https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.233001
- ^ a b Rolf Heidemann, et al. "Rydberg Excitation of Bose-Einstein Condensates" Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 033601(2008) https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.033601