"Politics_(essay)"
Politics is an essay written by Ralph Waldo Emerson. It is part of his Essays: Second Series, published in 1844. A premier philosopher, poet and leader of American transcendentalism, he used this essay to belie his feelings on government, specifically American government. His impact on New England thought and his views on pragmatism influenced the likes of Henry David Thoreau, Orestes Brownson, and Frederich Nietzsche, among others.
Summary
editAlthough not viewed as his most important essay in the second series, Emerson’s views on politics championed democracy and individualism, two ideas that are viewed today as undboutedly American. By 1844, Emerson, then 41, had moved into a pragmatic balance of skepticism and idealism, happily providing him with “a way to dream as well as a way to live”.[1] A quintessential American voice, Emerson projects a fundamental belief that the individual is more powerful than the state, and that the state cannot be an almighty, unchanging figure, as it was created by man.(CITE) This alone is not a reason to blindly follow the footsteps before us. Remember, he says, “The law is just a memorandum.” This gives rise to the most popular quote in Politics: “The less government we have the better.”
Emerson believed that an ideal government, aside from a nonexistent one dissolved when improvements in human character through love and wisdom could abolish the state, [2] was one that advocated for the growth of the individual, and be able to protect one’s individual rights. The individual would only ready for democracy when they had become completely independent and self-reliant. Then the abolishment of government could be achieved. The intelligence needed from each individual would triumph over business interests and politics, because the mind is the richest asset you can have.[3]
Emerson also questioned property rights in Politics, noting that they are built not built on democracy, instead on owning. Believing that “property will always follow persons”, Emerson believed personal rights were much more important that property rights.
The State
editEmerson’s overwhelming faith in the individual is completely opposite to his views on nations: “Every actual state is corrupt.” Political parties are “made out of necessity” of the time period and not out of any underlying theory. Emerson is very critical of both major parties in his essay.[4] “From neither party, when in power, has the world any benefit to expect in science, art or humanity, at all commensurate with the resources of the nation.” Neither party is satisfactory for Emerson, and his essay he hints at the natural inequality this system adheres to, and its effects. “All forms of government symbolize an immortal government, common to all dynasties and independent of numbers, perfect where two men exist, imperfect where there is only one man.” Government, he believes, is inherently based on exploitation, as well as for the ability to stay in power. (CITE?)
Party politics are not the only organization Emerson has his eye on in his essay, however. Emerson also distrusts the pulpit and the press because they are conventional roles that require organizational persuasion. [5]
References
edit- ^ Spiller, Robert E., J. Lyndon Shanley, Floyd Stovall, Leon Howard. Four Makers of the American Mind: Emerson, Thoreau, Whitman, and Melville. Durham, S.C. Duke University Press, 1976: 19
- ^ Padover, Saul K. The Genius of America: Men Whose Ideas Shaped Our Civilization. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1960. 191-93.
- ^ Leverenz, David. The Politics of Emerson’s Man-Making Words. PLMA, Vol. 101, No. 1 (Jan 1986) 38-56. http://www.jstor.org/stable/462534
- ^ Arnold, Samuel. Discourses in America. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1906: 169.
- ^ Leverenz, David. The Politics of Emerson’s Man-Making Words. PLMA, Vol. 101, No. 1 (Jan 1986) 38-56. http://www.jstor.org/stable/462534
External links
editRalph Waldo Emerson's Politics Speech
Category:Transcendentalism
Category:Ralph Waldo Emerson
Category:Essays