Article Evaluation
edit-Aztec Society
- Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
- The information is a little all over the place. There is an outline but the information does not connect very well and is out of order.
- Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
- There is some bias in this article, but for the most part is is neutral.
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- The culture aspect is underrepresented, the education of the aztecs has a lot of information though.
- Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
- There are many citations that are needed and some citations are incomplete. There are not any links to the sources.
- Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
- Most of the references are from university article websites. I am not sure if these are appropriate sources or not, but majority of the sources all come from one place so the information is not cross referenced.
- Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
- Several of the edits have been made this year, but there is information that could be added to each section.
- Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
- The article has been marked as needing immediate attention and of high importance. Many points have been taken out of the article because they were not cited.
- How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
- This article has been rater B-Class and is supported by WikiProject Aztec as high-importance
- How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
- We have not talked much about this topic in class yet.