{flagicon|USA}
The Capital and strategy
editThe War Department, and particularly Lincoln, consistently required its field commanders to defend the Capital at all times. These commanders had to take this into consideration in their planning, and not doing so (in the eyes of their civilian leadership) always had consequences. Among some of the best examples of the government's sensitivity to the protection of Washington and its effects are visible during the Peninsula Campaign of 1862 and the Gettysburg Campaign of 1863.
{subst:Clear}
Unref
editUnreferenced|date=June 2007
Harry T. Hays
Done
Not done
Misuse may cause it to be withdrawn.
Misuse may cause it to be withdrawn.
Misuse may cause it to be withdrawn.
Or even smallcaps? ("Kingdom Animalia · Phylum Chordata · ...")
FairCopyAudioRecording
editSummary
edit- CD cover art for **** by ****
- Copyright held by ****
Description |
CD cover art for **** by **** |
---|---|
Source |
digital capture |
Article |
No article specified. Please edit this file description and add the name of the article the file is used in. (get help with syntax) |
Portion used |
cover |
Low resolution? |
yes |
Purpose of use |
to identify CD in article only |
Replaceable? |
no |
Other information |
no |
Fair useFair use of copyrighted material in the context of [[]]//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kresock/Sandboxtrue |
Spacing
editwords
-
Caption1
-
Caption2
words{-}
Licensing
editNon-free album cover
Fair use in article ****
editAlthough this image is subject to copyright, its use is covered by the United States fair use laws because:
- It's a low resolution copy of the original CD's cover.
- Use of the image doesn't limit the copyright owner's rights to sell the CD in any way, but in fact may encourage sales.
- Because of its low resolution copies of it could not be used to make any illegal copies of the image.
- Its sole use is to identify the CD in question within the article.
- The image is significant because it was, and is, used to promoted the CD.
Image Source
edit- The image was derived from digital capture (photo/scan) of the CD's cover art. The creator of this digital version is irrelevant as copyright in all equivalent images is still held by the same party. Copyright is held by the record label, ****. Claimed as fair use regardless.
DVD
editSummary
edit- DVD cover image
Description |
DVD cover art for **** |
---|---|
Source |
digital capture |
Article |
No article specified. Please edit this file description and add the name of the article the file is used in. (get help with syntax) |
Portion used |
cover |
Low resolution? |
yes |
Purpose of use |
to identify DVD in article only |
Replaceable? |
no |
Other information |
no |
Fair useFair use of copyrighted material in the context of [[]]//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kresock/Sandboxtrue |
Licensing
editNon-free DVD cover
Fair use in ****
editThough this image is subject to copyright, its use is covered by the U.S. fair use laws because:
- It's a low resolution copy of a DVD Cover.
- It doesn't limit the copyright owner's rights to sell the film in any way, in fact, it may encourage sales.
- Because of the low resolution, copies could not be used to make illegal copies of the artwork/image.
- The image is itself a subject of discussion in the article or used in the infobox thereof.
- The image is significant because it was, and is, used to promoted a notable film.
Source
edit- Derived from a digital capture (photo/scan) of the DVD cover. The creator of this digital version is irrelevant as the copyright in all equivalent images is still held by the same party. Copyright held by the film company or the artist. Claimed as fair use regardless.
MusicVideoScreenshot
editSummary
edit- digital capture from original music video '*** by ****
Description |
screenshot from music video for **** |
---|---|
Source |
digital capture |
Article |
No article specified. Please edit this file description and add the name of the article the file is used in. (get help with syntax) |
Portion used |
cover |
Low resolution? |
yes |
Purpose of use |
to identify music video in article only |
Replaceable? |
no |
Other information |
no |
Fair useFair use of copyrighted material in the context of [[]]//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kresock/Sandboxtrue |
Licensing
editNon-free music video screenshot
Fair use rationale for article ****
edit- No free equivalent is available or could be created that would adequately give the same information.
- The image does not replace the original market role of the video or of the song.
- The image is low resolution.
- The video has previously been published.
- The image contributes significantly to the article by illustrating discussion of the music video.
Short sections
edit{sect-stub}
- (quote here)|(whomever said it here)|~ ~ ~
{album|class=|importance=|attention=|needs-infobox=}
{Refimprove|date=} additional cites needed
{citations missing|article|date=}
- SMALL ENTIRE LINENote: This. [[User:]][[User_talk:]]
Status code
edit{User:StatusBot/Status/Kresock}}
| online = Online | offline = Offline | unknown
}
Ruby references
editSalt Peter
edit- Nude As The News link
- review summary:
The album shows promise but fails to break new ground in the synth-pop genre... lyrics are almost frightening, with references to blood, meat, leeches and fire cropping up in numerous songs... often less-than-stellar musical accompaniment...hits the mark on a few songs, but Salt Peter as a whole falls short of the techno-pop mastery... "Tiny Meat," the album's best track, wonderfully fuses an upbeat guitar riff with Rankine's drum loops of choice...Ruby's first effort is surprisingly original. Though Salt Peter leaves the aural palate dissatisfied, it brushes with greatness.[1]
- Allmusic link
- review summary:
...Ruby's music is a dark, eerie fusion of trip-hop and industrial, with quietly menacing beats and droning synths... Not all of the album works, but Salt Peter remains a promising debut.[2]
- Section 3 link
- review summary:
Musically this album is very solid. Lesley and co-author Mark Walk lace together an incredible network of beats and sounds... The design of this album, and everything associated with Ruby is worth mentioning, because it is not only extraordinary... There is more than enough originality on this album to make Ruby stand alone in this world of commodity, sales, and hype.Cite error: The
<ref>
tag has too many names (see the help page).
- Epinions link
- review summary:
Without question, the album sounds like a mix of Garbage and Sneaker Pimps. It’s got a rock and roll edge (Garbage) with a leaning toward electronic music (Sneaker Pimps). In addition, Salt Peter is also mildly industrial... this nearly brilliant yet sorely overlooked album... Rankine and Walk assembled eleven mostly co-written tracks and in doing so put together an album absolutely worth the effort and money it takes to enjoy... And then there is Rankine’s voice, the centerpiece of this lovely album. Once again, it is perfectly timed precisely arranged and perfectly placed... Bravo to Rankine and Walk... Salt Peter is a wonderful album, and serves as a great bridge from the electronically enhanced rock of Garbage to more adventurous contemporary trip-hop acts.[3]
Short-Staffed at the Gene Pool
edit- Choler Magazine link
- review summary:
...Almost impossibly, Ruby has rebounded from 6 years of silence to deliver Short-staffed at the Gene Pool, a shimmering, irresistibly buoyant piece of electronic pop... It's a seductive album, which represents something of an evolution for the duo... Short-staffed does cut itself short in a few spots. It occasionally sounds assembled - the Protools seams show through a bit... Overall though, the album is a stunner...[4]
Stroking the Full Length
edit- Allmusic link
- Section 3 link
- review summary:
If you like packaging, videos, computer CD-ROMs, great industrial/electrical music, sexy lyrics, and a fully-interactive multimedia computer program, then this album is definitely for you... Ruby does this remix album justice, however. This is an awesome CD. Lesley Rankine and Mark Walk flex their electronic muscles on this album...[5]
Revenge, The Sweetest Fruit
edit- ____________ link
- review summary:
Altered and Proud, the Short Staffed Remixes
edit- Allmusic link
- review summary:
Only one or two mixes fail to add new interest to the original song (unfortunately, one of the least interesting is the album' s opening track). Overall, this is an excellent companion to a very fine album.[6]
- ^ ""Nude As The News: Ruby: Salt Peter"". www.nudeasthenews.com. Retrieved 2008-03-23.
{{cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|publisher=
(help) - ^ ""Allmusic Salt Peter Overview"". www.allmusic.com. Retrieved 2008-03-24.
{{cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|publisher=
(help) - ^ ""Salt Peter by Ruby (rock)"". www.epinions.com. Retrieved 2008-03-30.
{{cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|publisher=
(help) - ^ ""Choler Magazine Album Review: Ruby--Short-staffed at the Gene Pool"". www.cholermagazine.com. Retrieved 2008-03-23.
{{cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|publisher=
(help) - ^ ""Section 3-Ruby/Stroking the Full Length"". www.section3.com. Retrieved 2008-03-31.
{{cite web}}
: Check|url=
value (help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|publisher=
(help) - ^ ""Allmusic Altered and Proud: the Short Staffed Remixes Overview"". www.allmusic.com. Retrieved 2008-03-24.
{{cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|publisher=
(help)