Peer review
editThis is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.
General info
edit- Whose work are you reviewing? Lizrileymga
- Link to draft you're reviewing: Bibb Manufacturing Company
Lead evaluation
editThe lead states the topic clearly, and does a good job describing the article's major sections.
Content evaluation
editThe content is all relevant to the topic, and up to date.
Tone and Balance evaluation
editIt looks fairly neutral and unbiased, and does not attempt to persuade in any way.
Sources and References evaluation
editThere are a multitude of sources, almost every sentence in the article features a citation. The ones I clicked on worked, and seemed to be decently related to the topics.
Organization evaluation
editThe article is organized very well, and is easy to read. I did not notice any blatant grammatical or spelling errors.
Images and Media evaluation
editThere were three images, I think the placement is good and the images do a good job representing the context of the article. They had good captions.
New Article Evaluation
editThe article is notable, there is a large list of qualifying sources. The article is laid out well, and has numerous other embedded wiki subject links.
Overall impressions
editGuiding questions:
- Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
- What are the strengths of the content added?
- How can the content added be improved?
Overall evaluation
editThe article is fairly complete, and had good sources. One small possible improvement I noticed could be the Plants/locations header, it might possibly look better by removing the / and replacing it with text, something like "Plants and Locations".