Wikipedia

User:Lvhis/for WP:RM/CM

< User:Lvhis

Requested move

edit

Should use WP:RM/CM template|{subst:move-multi

| current1 = Senkaku Islands

| new1 = Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands

| current2 = Senkaku Islands dispute

| new2 = Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands dispute

| current3 = 2010 Senkaku boat collision incident

| new3 = 2010 Diaoyu/Senkaku boat collision incident

| reason = The name/title "Senkaku Islands" currently used for this article and its related articles has been disputed for quite a long time even after the previous RfC. A number of editors have raised the concern and recently have basically reached a consensus in light of great and increasing numbers of reliable sources published in English lanuage, as discussed in the talk page sections [18][19][20][21][22] , that a dual (hybrid) name such as "Diaoyu/Senkaku" or "Senkaku/Diaoyu" should be applied for the name/title of this articles and its related articles. According to reliable sources, for the name of the islands, "Senkaku" is Romanized Japanese name and "Diaoyu" is Romanized Chinese name (or described like "called Diaoyu in China and Senkaku in Japan"), and "Pinnacle Islands" is the name from English language but less used in the moden time.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Many reliable sources in English language directly use a dual (hybrid) form "Diaoyu/Senkaku" or "Senkaku/Diaoyu" making the two local names equally together and brief, and to keep these sources on independent neutral stand for this ownership disputed islands [8][10][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Using current single "Senkaku" for the name of this article and its related article has deviated far away from the main stream of reliable sources published in English language and is much less neutral than any independent English publications, so as to have damaged the merit and reliability of Wikipedia. According to Wikipedia:Five pillars particular WP:NPOV and WP:NOR, and other relevant policies including WP:V and WP:NCGN (in particular Multiple local names), now I request to move this article and its related articles under name "Diaoyu/Senkaku" as indicated above as soon as possible. Whether using "Diaoyu/Senkaku" or using "Senkaku/Diaoyu" should not become a critical issue preventing this move, as both of them have been used in many reliable sources published in English language, and both are relatively neutral. I tried to search them on Google Books or Google News Archive but it is almost impossible to clearly or completely separate them, i.e. one dual (hybrid) name search will always contain the other dual (hybrid) one, and the result of Google Books search gave an almost equal results for the two forms searches. After all we have to choose one from these two to request move, and I choose "Diaoyu/Senkaku" based on simple reasons: 1) the alphabetical order of English language, and 2 ) the historical order of names generated: "Diaoyu" generated as early as 1403[1] while "Senkaku" was generated around 1900[1].

Reliable Sources used in this request:

  1. ^ a b c Suganuma, Unryu (菅沼雲龍) (2001). Sovereign Rights and Territorial Space in Sino-Japanese Relations: Irredentism and the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands. Hawaii, USA: University of Hawaii Press. pp. 89–96. particularly p96 ISBN 978-0824821593.
  2. ^ Ogura, Junko (10-14-2010). "Japanese party urges Google to drop Chinese name for disputed islands". CNN World. CNN (US).
  3. ^ Hara, Kimie (原貴美恵)(2007). Cold War frontiers in the Asia-Pacific: divided territories in the San Francisco system. New York, USA: Routledge, c/o Taylor & Francis. p. 51.ISBN 9780415412087.
  4. ^ Kiyoshi Inoue (井上清). Senkaku Letto /Diaoyu Islands The Historical Treatise. (English synopsis [1])
  5. ^ Daniel J. Dzurek, "The Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands Dispute" at the International Boundary Research Unit web site, University of Durham, UK, October 1996 [2]
  6. ^ Jeffrey Hays.SENKAKU-DIAOYU ISLANDS DISPUTE BETWEEN JAPAN AND CHINA. [3] Facts and Details
  7. ^ Koji Taira. The China-Japan Clash Over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands [4] This is an article that originally appeared in "The Ryukyuanist", spring 2004.
  8. ^ a b Joyman Lee. Senkaku/Diaoyu: Islands of Conflict Published in History Today Volume: 61 Issue: 5 2011
  9. ^ Jean-Marc F. Blanchard. The U. S. Role in the Sino-Japanese Dispute over the Diaoyu (Senkaku) Islands, 1945-1971.[5]The China Quarterly No. 161 (Mar, 2000), pp. 95-123.Cambridge University Press
  10. ^ a b Martin Lohmeyer (2008). The Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands Dispute University of Canterbury
  11. ^ Encyclopedia Britannica [6]
  12. ^ National Geographic Atlas [7]
  13. ^ UNISCI Discussion Papers, Nº 32 (Mayo / May 2013) [8]
  14. ^ Chinese and Japanese ships cluster around disputed islands. CNN.[9]
  15. ^ Why China's new air zone incensed Japan, U.S. CNN.[10]
  16. ^ China Extends Air Defense over Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands in East China Sea Dispute with Japan. The Brookings Institution.[11]
  17. ^ The Diaoyu/Senkaku Dispute as an Identity-Based Conflict: Toward Sino-Japan Reconciliation. GMU-SCAR.[12]
  18. ^ Chinese pilots patrol controversial air zone over the disputed Senkaku/Diaoyu islands. The Telegraph.[13]
  19. ^ Q&A: China-Japan islands row. BBC. [14]
  20. ^ The Senkaku/Diaoyu Island Controversy. Naval War Colloge Review. Spring 2013, Vol 66, No. 2. [15][16]
  21. ^ U.S. bombers defy disputed Chinese air space. PBS Newshour.[17]
  22. ^ Katrin Katz. Name GamesThe Foreign Policy Group.

}}

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Lvhis/for_WP:RM/CM&oldid=585619322"