Notes
edit(items are approximately in order or priority/severitry)
Current
editblp rulescruft; esp misuse of source rules to block content
ani board: consistent enforcement of policy, or lack thereof; lack of coherent "procedure" & focus in "cases"/complaints; lack of suitable (& easily-located) alternative procedures for user problems. either the process needs to be fixed, or responsibility for handling user-problems needs to go elsewhere.
mis-use of source rules to block content
"spam filter" being used as a de facto "blacklist" of reference-sources, w/o community discussion/decision on blocked sources
dab hatnote inconsistency/absences
rulescruft, (& the resulting rulespew/rulespuke) in general; esp. rules-creep. you know it's bad, when we need an encyclopedia, (just) for the operating rules of the encyclopedia...
mos: inflexibility, obsolescence (of regulations), overkill
...
General
editorganization of information, information-organizing shortcomings of media-wiki (search/sort/etc.; cross-indexing!; multiple-parameter search/sort; &c., &c., &c.... ), lack of tools, ease of use, etc.
rulescruft
lack of consideration/priority of end-user convenience/functionality
declining editor community/loss of editors
funding & expenditures; complete dependence on donations X wmf budget-growth = troubles ahead
...