Wikipedia does not care about you or me being qualified scholars. Wikipedia is not a scholarly site, but a summary of sources that speak for themselves. We all have the right to edit, but there are rules to make sure that proper sources are used for appropriate articles and editors are civil. -- In other words: duh only book-lurnin we likes 's frum books, not school-folk wit deir fancy-shmancy deeplomas. Ye ain't gots to be unschooled to edit, but ya bettah bring yer damn sauces like uh chef at tha Italian resteeraunt.
I am not an administrator or moderator. I realize I am nobody special. I do not care what religion or worldview you do or do not believe. I have made my religious and philosophical beliefs open because if I was trying to enforce any sort of secondary agenda (which I am not), I would be smart enough to hide the reasons behind that agenda; and also so that other users may know what sort of articles I may have an interest in helping with. I am more concerned with keeping the articles I view within the guidelines than I am with bullying anyone. Thinking that I am an admin or mod, pointing out I am neither those nor someone special, pointing out that Wikipedia is not a reliable source, or accusing me of religious zealotry or any other sort of bullying will not:
- convince me to not enforce rules (just ask about them!),
- somehow turn any negative edits by you into good ones (just ask for help!),
- undo any reports I have made,
- somehow turn any postive enforcement of the rules by me into bullying.
|
|
