Dermatology-related content progress
editThanks again for your help in the past with the dermatology-related content on Wikipedia. We have continued to make significant progress with the Bolognia push. Also, the most recent project popular page statistics are out, and the list of cutaneous conditions continues to rise, now #49, up from #65 last month. Thanks again for your support! ---kilbad (talk) 01:12, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi! I've started Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis; you may be interested in this as a medical student. Happy 2010 and cheers, --CopperKettle 18:12, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Requesting you for Adminship
editMinimac94 (talk) 11:08, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
- Hi, thank you for the nomination, i appreciate it, and i will accept it, actually i was waiting for it, thank you again and am so grateful to you :-) MaenK.A.Talk 16:59, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
- I would urge you to reconsider running for now unless you can assure us that the two Huggle errors you made today are unlikely to happen again; I would not be willing to support an admin who seems liable to make judgement errors like that. Also I note your edit count seems rather low lately; though that won't cause me to oppose, it may make others wonder if you're really here this time. -- Soap Talk/Contributions 19:19, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
- Hi, I thank you for your concern, and I assure you i will be more careful and more active, for now, the closed the RFA, per WP:SNOW, but I will rerun soon, with better contributions and less huggle mistakes, and I ll be more prepared for this, thank you again Done MaenK.A.Talk 12:28, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- I would urge you to reconsider running for now unless you can assure us that the two Huggle errors you made today are unlikely to happen again; I would not be willing to support an admin who seems liable to make judgement errors like that. Also I note your edit count seems rather low lately; though that won't cause me to oppose, it may make others wonder if you're really here this time. -- Soap Talk/Contributions 19:19, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Please stop reverting my edits
editI am deleting someone's text because they wrote "LOLOLOLOLOLOL......" all over it. I keep seeing it being reinstated and am wondering why you would put all of the vandalism back. Please warn P90god for vandalising the page. 24.16.96.51 (talk) 17:50, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
- sorry for bothering and i reverted every thing, and removed you warnings, take care and welcome Done MaenK.A.Talk 17:55, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Incorrect Huggle reverts
editHi there. You reverted an edit by Clockbox (talk · contribs) on Alyssa martinez in which the user blanked the page and replaced it with a G10 (attack page) speedy deletion tag. Policy specifies that users are supposed to blank the page when tagging under that criteria. Nevertheless, you reverted the edit as vandalism and restored the obviously libelous, attacking content to the page. I have once again tagged it appropriately and hopefully it will soon be deleted. Please be more careful in reviewing an edit before you hit the revert button, especially when dealing with issues as tender as attack pages. Thanks, Nick—Contact/Contribs 18:25, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
- I ll make sure to be more careful next time, thank you for correcting my mistake :-) DoneMaenK.A.Talk 18:28, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
RFA
editI have closed your RFA per WP:SNOW. If you have any questions concerning this closure, please feel free to ask. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 06:57, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks
editHi Madhero88, thank you for the warm welcome to Wikipedia you placed on my Talk page. I didn't know for sure if I should answer it there or here so I did both :) Thanks again. ILuvLilG (talk) 21:15, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- You are most welcome, and dont worry about that, you can answer on my page, or on your but notify me with a talkback message just like the one that appears at the bottom, take care, and feel free to ask any question, I ll be glad to help Done MaenK.A.Talk 15:58, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks ...
edit... for restoring my User page. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 18:05, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
regarding valentines day article
editi changed the article because i edited the wrong info. i put it back into where it should be and the change should not have been reverted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.184.220.67 (talk) 19:20, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Tugan-Baranowsky
editThanks for the greetings. User-account: well, always too much to do, and I edit too rarely (and in too many Wiki languages) to keep track of my own tracks. Just fell across the Tugan article (I am interested in the fellow) and got annoyed by the confusion between an MA (magister in Russian) and a "magistrate" (with link to latter). But the art. also badly needed some englishing (Slavs have no articles, hence never know where to put "the" or "a"); did some of that - more could be done. On the article in general too - strange that the Ukrainian author omitted the touching fact (according to Wiki-RU) that Tugan-B died in 1919 (of the swine-flu of that period?) on the train that took a Ukrainian delegation to Versailles to be heard about their claim to autonomy (they weren't heard - changing the national frontiers of a victor country was not on the agenda, only for the losers).
C. Wittich (claus.wittich@swissonline.ch), Geneva 92.107.132.212 (talk) 15:14, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- Hi, thank you for your contributions, and be sure that if you join you will have a global account on all the wikipedias in all the languages, and remember you would lose nothin if you join, but you will help to get things more clear and organised DoneMaenK.A.Talk 15:17, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Eh?
editDid you even read my edit summaries before reverting my edits??? 86.159.221.187 (talk) 15:28, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- So sorry i missed the quotes, i thought its a part of the article MaenK.A.Talk 15:31, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- But that doesn't explain why you reverted my edits without reading my edit summaries. You can't ignore someone's edit summaries (which clearly explained what I was doing), then accuse them of making "unconstructive edits" and say that their edits are "not allowed". The really insulting thing is that in your reprimand on my talk page, you advised me to use edit summaries. I DID AND YOU DIDN'T BOTHER READING THEM BEFORE TREATING ME LIKE A VANDAL. I thought Wikipedia editors were supposed to treat other editors with respect, not contempt. 86.159.221.187 (talk) 15:38, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- Also, you only addressed one of my edits that you reverted. What about the other one?? 86.159.221.187 (talk) 15:39, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- I am so sorry again, and i didn't mean any disrespect, i red the summery, but the thing i missed that the word bullshit was inside the quotes marks, am sorry again, and please consider joining and reading that edit, thank you MaenK.A.Talk 15:44, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- "Please consider... reading that edit"? I don't understand. What edit do you want me to read? 86.159.221.187 (talk) 15:45, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- I am so sorry again, and i didn't mean any disrespect, i red the summery, but the thing i missed that the word bullshit was inside the quotes marks, am sorry again, and please consider joining and reading that edit, thank you MaenK.A.Talk 15:44, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- Also, you only addressed one of my edits that you reverted. What about the other one?? 86.159.221.187 (talk) 15:39, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- But that doesn't explain why you reverted my edits without reading my edit summaries. You can't ignore someone's edit summaries (which clearly explained what I was doing), then accuse them of making "unconstructive edits" and say that their edits are "not allowed". The really insulting thing is that in your reprimand on my talk page, you advised me to use edit summaries. I DID AND YOU DIDN'T BOTHER READING THEM BEFORE TREATING ME LIKE A VANDAL. I thought Wikipedia editors were supposed to treat other editors with respect, not contempt. 86.159.221.187 (talk) 15:38, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Please slow down while reverting
editAt Ministro Pistarini International Airport 186.136.134.12 (talk · contribs) made this edit making a mess of the page, please scroll down and look at it. 189.135.88.222 (talk · contribs) then restored the correct/standard version which Clubot reverted. 189.135.88.222 then fixed the page three more times with edit summaries only to be reverted by three different editors. While I realise that there is a lot of vandalism going on there still needs to be time to stop and see what a person is doing before you revert them. Thanks. something lame from CBW 09:14, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Please espect user space and inuse tags
edit[1] Giano 12:13, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks
editThanks for the warm welcome. Much appreciated :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Overeasy456 (talk • contribs) 11:31, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Help with table position
editHi there - You kindly offered your help, so I have a question for you :-) I have placed a (discography) table in the page I'm constructing, however when not in edit mode it appears in the wrong location. Within my code it is positioned directly under the 'Partial Discography' / 'Albums' headings, however on the actual page it shows up at the bottom (i.e. below 'References' and 'External Links'). Am I missing something obvious here? ;-) Your help would be appreciated, thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Overeasy456 (talk • contribs) 13:19, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
- Hi, yea am here for help, And its corrected now, the only thing you were missing is the |} at the end of the table, that was the problem and it is corrected now, and a general note dont forget signing your messages with ~~~~ MaenK.A.Talk 13:27, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Deleted postings
editHi. I'm new to Wikipedia and after 3 posts you are already accusing me of vandalism! I just don't understand what I have done wrong. I was attempting to give some facts about the history of contaminated blood in the uk, using information which I have helped put together as secretary of another group - how can it be copyrighted if I helped produce it? I removed all links and re-wrote it in other words and you still took it off. Please explain what I am doing wrong because I am now scared to post again as many others are ready to add things to this site which we hoped would be a valuable source of information. I use Wikipedia all the time but this has really made me hesitant about contributing. I don't want a campaign site - I've got that - just a source of information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Contamblood (talk • contribs) 17:45, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
- I think this message was intended for me, and I've replied here [2]. 99.153.141.240 (talk) 20:32, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks
editHi, thank's a lot for the welcome, it's really nice of you! Thanks for the cookies too obviously.... Fixcef (talk) 18:34, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
- you are very welcome, enjoy editing, and feel free to ask for anything Done MaenK.A.Talk 17:31, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks!
editThank you for the vandalism reversions. Cheers Gillyweed (talk) 23:44, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Regarding Silent Hill Characters.
editHi! You reverted an edit made by me in which I removed some paragraphs on one of the characters, Alessa Gillespie. I have moved them into her own article, as they all just sit there messily and just... ugly. When you reverted it, you turned the article back into the "block-of-text" version. I'm not quite sure why, when I was cleaning it up? As my edit is not vandalism, do you mind reverting it? Thanks, Markaz (talk) 18:52, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
- I have only welcomed you, I didnt revert any of your edits, as you can see here Cluebot was the one who reverted your edits, and warned you Done MaenK.A.Talk 18:54, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
- The revision page itself which is located here says you're the one who reverted it, though. Markaz (talk) 19:06, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
I'm new, need help!
editThanks for the welcome. I am very busy with many things and do not have time to research Wikipedia proceedures as much as I would like before contributing. I will try to learn ASAP.
I have my doctoral degree in Sufism, really Tasqia, and understand the subject of Sufism as well as most, perhaps more.
I made a small but very important contribution under IN MOVIES section of the Sufism page and am meeting with some real confusing arguments that Sufi Films is not Sufi but somehow Madonna warrents honorable mention under IN MUSIC. I really do not have time to argue and continue undoing what a person who refuses to offer any credentials on the subject insists on destroying. There is no constructive changes, just total destruction of the entry.
I wonder if you might be able to intervene? I have heard this complaint about Wikipedia and now understand it more. I love the open source, but it is so frustrating to see someone with no expertise have such a major disruptive presence on a subject they seem to know little or nothing about.
Please advice and thank you again.
BeUnknown —Preceding unsigned comment added by BeUnknown (talk • contribs) 08:20, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry I am unable to help you in this, but i ll be glad to help in other things :-) Done MaenK.A.Talk 15:16, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
dignity album
editother articles of albums have tracklkist on the top, the tracklisting should be above critical recep. commercial succes, ect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eddiep803b (talk • contribs) 22:08, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi!
edithey madhero88! I have just created my first article Manasvi Mamgai. It would be of great help if you could review my article and give some feedbacks. Thanks for the welcome, especially the cookies! (Pochaontas (talk) 08:27, 17 February 2010 (UTC))
- Hi, I reviewed your article, and added some internal links, and added templates to talk page, because this is the way the talk page should be, and finally I marked it as reviewed and removed the template, have fun editing, and please ask me for anything you want, take care :-) Done MaenK.A.Talk 17:37, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Revert to chessington
editI know the edit summary was stupid, but the edits made were actually more appropriate for a wikipedia article. Regards, Josh :)
james1906
editI'm not going to feed the trolls. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.95.216.34 (talk) 19:11, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Please check my 1st Wikipedia page, thanks
editThanks for your help so far... I think the bulk of my page is now done, and I'm ready to remove the 'Under Construction' note. Would you perhaps be kind enough to take a look and see if you feel that I've hit all the requirements for Wikipedia? Many thanks. I've tried to reference as much as possible, and all of my subject's albums listed in the discography are commercially available and verifiable. Thanks for your assistance!
Overeasy456 (talk) 14:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Heey, I am glad to help, first your doing a good job, and hope that you are enjoying editing wikipedia, second, your use of edit summery is a great thing to start with. The articles looks good and well referenced, but there is a small note about the external links in the leading paragraph, this shouldn't be there and should be moved under section titled external links, another notice, is that you add a "[" after your <ref> tags, and it appears in black and of no use as you can see, so you can remove them, after all, your doing good, keep it up, and Always remember I can help in whatever you need, whenever you need :-) MaenK.A.Talk 15:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Changes Made
editThank you very much for checking my page so quickly - I've fixed those little things you picked up on :-) Could you tell me if I'm now OK to remove the 'Under Construction' badge? Thanks again for helping a newbie like me ;-) Overeasy456 (talk) 15:39, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- I already did :-), and always remember that improvements can be done, and keep up the good work :-) MaenK.A.Talk 15:43, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- By the way, dont forget to add categories to the page and templates to the talk page, and if you cant I ll add them MaenK.A.Talk 15:44, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Many thanks, again! :-) Yes, I will keep updating the page as and when new info becomes available...
- Another quick question - You mentioned "templates to the talk page". Sorry to appear dumb, but I don't really know what you mean Could you explain a little more please? Cheers! Overeasy456 (talk) 15:53, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- I will add the templates to the article for now, and i dont know if you noticed, that every article talk page, have templates at the top of the page donating the project to which it belongs, its class and its importance if you still have any questions dont hesitate to ask DoneMaenK.A.Talk 18:35, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- By the way, dont forget to add categories to the page and templates to the talk page, and if you cant I ll add them MaenK.A.Talk 15:44, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Islam and blasphemy
editCould you please stop adding back the incorrect info that I keep trying to edit out. The things I keep editing out don't represent Islam at all. This page is about blasphemy in ISLAM not about some twisted UNislamic customs that some countries with misguided interpretations of Islam adhere to.
Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.171.219.68 (talk) 19:23, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
About your offer to mentor Chuck Marean
editHi -- I saw your generous offer to help this user, but I have to wonder if you truly know what you are getting into here. Take a look at this thread about the matter, & carefully review the discussions referenced there. To properly help him become a productive Wikipedian may require more time & experience than your edit history indicates you can give (& I don't know how much spare time a medical student truly would have for Wikiepdia); but on the other hand, if you do successfully mentor Chuck Marean -- or at least make a determined, good-faith effort & fail -- it would be something in your favor should you want to go thru the RfA gauntlet again. -- llywrch (talk) 06:04, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
- Hey, Thank you so much for the advise, You are so right, I dont have that much time, I am mostly busy during week days, so I have withdrawn my offer, I didn't notice the issues that he is in, thank you again for the advise, take care :-) MaenK.A.Talk 08:50, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
- No problem. As I said, you are very generous for making the offer, so don't take my warning as adverse criticism in any way. (It would take a very experienced & patient Wikipedian to help him -- if he truly wants to improve.) I do hope you continue to look for people to help mentor on Wikipedia & find it rewarding helping them, as well that you do continue to enjoy contributing here. Take care. -- llywrch (talk) 22:36, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks
editThanks for reverting vandalism to my userpage! Here have a cheeseburger:
Acather96 (talk) has given you a Cheeseburger! Cheeseburgers promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a Cheeseburger, whether it be someone you've had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy eating!
Spread the goodness of Cheeseburgers by adding {{subst:Cheeseburger}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
user page
editPlease leave my user page alone. James1906 (talk) 16:52, 20 February 2010 (UTC)james1906
Smack My Crack
editI created a page for the compilation album Smack My Crack featuring Tom Waits, Nick Cave, Butthole Surfers and much more.
I'm trying to figure out how to publish it or make it public, I'd also like to know how to appropriately add a picture of the album cover.
http://brainwashed.com/giorno/images/smack_my_crack.jpg
Also any input would be appreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Justron (talk • contribs) 16:53, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
- Hi, thank you for asking for help, first you did great by creating the article as a subpage under your userpage, this is the best way to create an article, moving it to the main space is easy copy and past process, after clicking this link Smack My Crack, I ve added you the infobox, and uploaded the album cover, you need to complete filling the infobox, about the cover, as you can see there must be a free rationale for use, which is usually already ready, only you need to fill the article's name, and for this cover in particular it will be ready once you create the page for the album, after all have fun editing, and please ask for help whenever you want some, take care MaenK.A.Talk 17:24, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
- Great work, but you need to add appropriate templates to the talk page MaenK.A.Talk 19:29, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
- what? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Justron (talk • contribs) 19:48, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
- First remember you need to sign your messages by adding ~~~~ at the end of our message, and about the templates as you can see, that the talk page of each article, has templates that helps in categorization and tracking, ill add templates to this article, but you need to add categories to the page it self, take care MaenK.A.Talk 19:52, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
- what? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Justron (talk • contribs) 19:48, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
- Great work, but you need to add appropriate templates to the talk page MaenK.A.Talk 19:29, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
it is very ugly
editit is very ugly —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.62.55.227 (talk) 19:51, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Thank you!
editThank you so much for the star. That was very kind of you! ---kilbad (talk) 18:07, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- Your most welcome, you deserve much more than that, keep up the good work Done MaenK.A.Talk 21:55, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
Adoption
editI think that it would be better if I went to admin coaching instead. Hamtechperson 20:10, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- No problem, and thank you for reverting the offer, take care and enjoy editing Done MaenK.A.Talk 17:19, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Szatmár-Bereg National Park
editthe article is nonsense and the park does not exist! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.208.73.130 (talk) 16:45, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- You cant blank the page for any reason before discussing that on its talk page, please consider joining us if you are interested in making this a better place MaenK.A.Talk 16:51, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- Done (talk page). thanx. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.208.73.130 (talk) 17:04, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Thomas Henry Wyatt
editOn the page there is a mention of his elder brother...particularly in comparison with his elder brother, the better known Matthew Digby Wyatt. But Matthew was born in 1820 and Thomas was born in 1807. That would make Thomas the elder brother. This is correct on Matthew Wyatt's page...Born in Rowde, Wyatt trained as an architect in the office of his elder brother, Thomas Henry Wyatt. So for Thomas, it should say younger brother. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.38.170.34 (talk) 13:50, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry but you didn't use any edit summery, and you didn't add any source so I cant keep that on, you can discuss the issue on the article's talk page Done MaenK.A.Talk 15:04, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Darlenne Susan Girard
edit{{helpme]] (Kookdownthelane 20:28, 24 February 2010 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kookdownthelane (talk • contribs)
Could I get your feedback
editPerhaps I could get your thoughts on my first feature picture nomination at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Pyogenic granuloma 1.jpg? ---kilbad (talk) 00:36, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks...
edit... for the cookies! Yum! Be seeing you :) BrashesVoucher (talk) 10:09, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
YOU THE MAN.
editI never hoped that someone would be "watching" my back, thanks a lot. Zidane tribal (talk) 21:46, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
I Zidane tribal award this star to Madhero88 for his cat-like reflexes on reverting a personal attack in my user talk. Zidane tribal (talk) 21:46, 25 February 2010 (UTC) |
- Heyy thank you soo much for the star, Keep up the good work and I ll be always watching your back :-) DoneMaenK.A.Talk 21:49, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
CSD G1
editThanks for helping out with new page patrolling. I notice that you have been tagging several "awesome/coolest/beast" articles with CSD G1/Nonsense, but these pages are not nonsense. Nonsense articles are random things or stuff you can't comprehend. The kids' "So-and-so is the awesome/coolest/beast/nicest/whatever" articles should be tagged with A7 or maybe G3 if the article is way out there (like anything mentioning Chuck Norris). -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:48, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you for the advise, its just I am kinda new to this, but I am teachable, and i learn fast, I ll make sure I ll make less mistakes in the future, Thank you again for pointing that out, enjoy editing MaenK.A.Talk 19:53, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Goethean a confirmed sockpuppt, should his user page be tagged?
editUser:Goethean is a confirmed sock see Goethean checkuser reoport I ask, this guys a sockpuppetmaster and should be tagged?76.202.235.250 (talk) 14:57, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- No he was not confirmed to be a sock, it was proved that this account is unrelated to any other account, am i mistaking?? MaenK.A.Talk 15:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- Respectful, yes... see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Goethean76.202.235.250 (talk) 15:10, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- TimZBrooks (talk+ • tag • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • spi block • block log • checkuser)
- Joeperez69 (talk+ • tag • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • spi block • block log • checkuser)
- Both of the IPs basically self-identified on behaviour.
- PLEASE READ FULLY thanks.76.202.235.250 (talk) 15:12, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- But there is no evidence that states that user:Goethean is involved in this, I red the page fully and at its end, its stated that user:Goethean account is unrelated to any of the reported user accounts MaenK.A.Talk 15:15, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- I understand now. Thank you for taking the time to look in to this.76.202.235.250 (talk) 15:19, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- But there is no evidence that states that user:Goethean is involved in this, I red the page fully and at its end, its stated that user:Goethean account is unrelated to any of the reported user accounts MaenK.A.Talk 15:15, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
sorry
edithey man sorry i was just messing around —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hawkeyed Falcon (talk • contribs) 15:51, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- Hi, your welcome to Wikipedia, but you cant mess around like this, you can easily blocked, and as you noticed you was 1 wrong edit away from an indefinite block, anyways, you can be constructive, which is what i hope, enjoy editing, and consider asking for help, I ll be around most of the time, take care Done MaenK.A.Talk 16:12, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
محسن خدادادی
editHello. Just to let you know, an article written in a foreign language is not an automatic reason for speedy deletion. This is only th case if there's a corresponding version on a foreign language Wiki. The normal procedure for tagging such articles would be using {{notenglish|<language>}} and listing it on WP:PNT.
Anyhow, I still kept a speedy deletion note on this article since I checked it with Google translations and found it to be a non-notable biography in Farsi. De728631 (talk) 16:40, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you allot for the notice, and I ll make sure that I dont do this mistake again, enjoy editing Done MaenK.A.Talk 16:58, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Adoption
editI accept your offer of adoption NickThePhotographer (talk) 18:27, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thats great, We are ready to go, Wold you recommend something we start by?? or should we start by the basics??, By the way, you can ask any question that crosses your mind MaenK.A.Talk 19:50, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- Nothing so far, but if anything pops up I'll let you know! Done --NickThePhotographer (talk) 01:29, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
No worries
editDon't worry about it. I put it back to normal.Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk | Sign 20:16, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry about that. I was trying to send a message via Huggle to a user who blanked a page by accident. You reverted their edit before I sent the message, so it went to you instead. Sorry about confusing you, I confused myself because I didn't know where the message had gone! Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk | Sign 20:24, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. You too. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk | Sign 20:28, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Editing messages
editThese are called "editnotices". For information about them and how to make one, see WP:EDITNOTICE. fetchcomms☛ 01:22, 28 February 2010 (UTC)