Ebola-article review Assessment class Has been rated a B- class article? It’s a good article Templates Editors have been protected. It has a long list of revision history Has had 2,567 minor edits, 136 site links, 9,151 total edits, 3,691 editors Stability  It is under semi-protection to protect it from vandalism. This means this article is being monitored.  It has had many recent edits therefore it is not stable.  Has 3691 editors meaning it NPOV has increased with time.  It was last edited on 9 November 2020  Has external links from the World Health Organization, Scientific American and the Food and Drug Admission Reference diversity The article has: • External links • How to videos-16 videos • Academic books • Websites with high traffic • Has reference sources from peer-reviewed journals e.g. Taylor and Francis, Centers of Disease Control of World Health Organization Breadth 1. Has a title, in-out links. It has its list of contents highlighted and hyperlinked. Has images 2. Has organized contents with brief subtopics. 3. Has two maps one for entire Africa and another one for West Africa 4. Has a graph showing cases of death Mzili (talk) 12:47, 4 January 2021 (UTC) 5. Has 16 videos 6. Has illustrations like the one describing the life cycle of Ebola

Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ebola Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).https://xtools.wmflabs.org/articleinfo/en.wikipedia.org/Ebola#top-editors Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).https://xtools.wmflabs.org/articleinfo/en.wikipedia.org/Ebola the article content is therefore reliable and useful.

suggestions to improve should be on the noted errors of grammatical mistakes,the medical confirmation on some parts of the article