scrapbook

edit

[[User:Nobody Ent/Don't Underestimate the Power of The Assume Good Faith|Don't Underestimate the Power of The Assume Good Faith]] ~~~~

Don't Underestimate the Power of The Assume Good Faith

The purpose of adminship is to help the editors edit by dealing performing certain technical tasks. As these tasks (blocking users, deleting pages, protecting pages) can damage Wikipedia if used inappropriately, we have ya'll go through an Rfa first.

Wikimedia:Terms_of_Use Wikimedia:Privacy_policy

ANI is not supposed to be Wikipedia's version of the Colosseum where we engage in the public spectacle of thumbs-up, thumbs-down block this editor! (e.g. WP:PITCHFORKS).

So apparently Napoleon and Patton -- according to people way smarter than me who understand these things -- were great battlefield generals due to their use of terrain. What I do know is that on Wikipedia the territory one wants to seize is the article talk page.

File:Statue_of_Liberty_restoration_project.jpg

[1] ARCA on DS

Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Japan-related articles/Archive 26

First WQA

https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Policies

Title

edit

[1]

[2] British "gravitational system" length force time, foot pound section [3] [2] banner [3]John Carter

[4] move page instructions [5]

[6] prev comments arbcom [7] username

In matters of truth and justice, there is no difference between large and small problems, for issues concerning the treatment of people are all the same. -einstein, widely attributed but rarely/never sourced

wqa on watchlist

edit

here

civility

edit

Wikipedia:Incivility_blocks

Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Civility_enforcement

[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility_enforcement#Inconsistencies_in_civility_enforcement]]

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility_enforcement#Inconsistencies_in_civility_enforcement

Throughout the project, breaches of the expected level of decorum are common. These violations of the community's standards of conduct are unevenly, and often ineffectively, enforced. (1,2)
— English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee

Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/Civility_enforcement [[Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/Civility_enforcement]]

WP:ADMINACCT "Administrators are expected to respond promptly and civilly to queries about their Wikipedia-related conduct and administrator actions and to justify them when needed."

In a recent principle, arbcom explained: "Administrators are expected to behave respectfully and civilly in their interactions with others. This requirement is not lessened by perceived or actual shortcomings in the conduct of others."

arbcom comment on content

edit

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/TimidGuy_ban_appeal#Focus_on_the_edits_not_the_editor

9) Per policy, "as a matter of … effective discourse, comments should not be personalized. That is, they should be directed at content and actions rather than people." Disparaging an editor or casting aspersions is a personal attack, regardless of the manner in which it is done. The usual exception to this principle is reasonably expressed concerns raised within a legitimate dispute resolution process.

Per policy, "as a matter of … effective discourse, comments should not be personalized. That is, they should be directed at content and actions rather than people." Disparaging an editor or casting aspersions is a personal attack, regardless of the manner in which it is done. The usual exception to this principle is reasonably expressed concerns raised within a legitimate dispute resolution process.

reliability problem?

edit

Does Wikipedia have an accuracy problem?

Wikipedia:No reliable sources, no verifiability, no article

invisible banner

edit

[http://www.useit.com/alertbox/fancy-formatting.html banners are invisible]

watchers

edit

watcher

informal

edit

Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2012-10-29/Recent_research#informal

ensuring participation and transparency is crucial for maintaining the stability of self-governing communities.
— Schroeder, Wagner, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology[4]

10 steps to calm angry

edit

[8]

bad speech

edit

the best answer for bad speech is more speech.
— Mike Godwin[5]

Berkman Sciences/Po

edit

http://wikimedia.7.n6.nabble.com/Regarding-Berkman-Sciences-Po-study-td1467224.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2011-12-12/News_and_notes

http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Dynamics_of_Online_Interactions_and_Behavior

Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)/Archive_95#Search_banner_Wikipedia_Research_Committee

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive731#Harvard.2FScience_Po_Adverts

AN is community

edit

Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Procedures#Reversal_of_enforcement_actions [9]

Stop

edit

The final stop for disputes in Wikipedia is the Arbitration Committee (AC).

 
Disputes have to end somewhere.

Preventative

edit

I'm not sure if you've read the blocking policy but "preventative" goes beyond "preventing immediate damage to the encyclopedia" and into "acting as a deterrent to further issues" and "encouraging a better atmosphere".
— User:Worm That Turned

[10]

As Worm That Turned once explained: I'm not sure if you've read the blocking policy but "preventative" goes beyond "preventing immediate damage to the encyclopedia" and into "acting as a deterrent to further issues" and "encouraging a better atmosphere".

[11] [12] [13] [14]

NAC RFC

edit

Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/Archive_12#Review

magic

edit

{{NUMBEROFACTIVEUSERS}} 114,194
{{NUMBEROFARTICLES}} 6,860,362
{{NUMBEROFADMINS}} 855
[http://tools.wmflabs.org/templatecount/index.php?lang=en&name=Unreferenced&namespace=10#bottom] [15]
{{#expr: {{formatnum:{{NUMBEROFARTICLES}}|R}} / {{formatnum:{{NUMBEROFACTIVEUSERS}}|R}} }} 60.076378793982
{{#expr: {{formatnum:{{NUMBEROFARTICLES}}|R}} /{{formatnum:{{NUMBEROFADMINS}}|R}} }} 8023.8152046784

{{#expr: {{formatnum:{{NUMBEROFACTIVEUSERS}}|R}} / {{formatnum:{{NUMBEROFADMINS}}|R}} }} 133.56023391813

{{#expr: 1 / {{formatnum:{{NUMBEROFACTIVEUSERS}}|R}} }} 8.7570275145805E-6

v: 0.0051929173161462 Wikipedia:List of administrators/Active


n * (n-1)/2: 6,520,077,721

Articles: 6,860,362 Active users: 114,194 Articles / user: 60.076378793982

Page Number of editors proportion of active users source
MFD 29 0.00025395379792283 [16]
Evidence 41 0.0003590381280978 [17]
this one 63 0.00055169273341857 [18]

tech review

edit

"The loose collective running the site today, estimated to be 90 percent male, operates a crushing bureaucracy with an often abrasive atmosphere that deters newcomers who might increase participation in Wikipedia and broaden its coverage."
— Tim Simonite, Technology Review [19]

early close

edit

Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Daniel_Brandt_deletion_wheel_war#Early_closure_of_discussions_based_on_WP:SNOW_is_harmful

"There is fairly universal agreement and understanding that there is an important reason why my talk page has to be handled somewhat differently from others as a traditional space to have philosophical debates about the principles of the project, and for editors with grievances to have a chance to be heard. That openness to criticism and debate is part of what has made Wikipedia successful." -Jimbo Wales

Scripts

edit

User:Ale_jrb/Scripts http://project.paragram.org/wpuser/ Interaction grapher

Grit

edit

[20]

refs

edit
  1. ^ Wurbs, Ralph A, Fort Hood Review Sessions for Professional Engineering Exam (PDF), retrieved June 10, 2011
  2. ^ Lindeburg, Michael, Civil Engineering Reference Manual for the PE Exam
  3. ^ Avallone, Eugene; Baumesiter III, Theodore (1978). Marks' Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers (Ninth ed.). p. 1-25. ISBN 0-07-004127-X. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |trans_title= and |month= (help)
  4. ^ Schroeder, A., Wagner, C. (2012). Governance of open content creation: A conceptualization and analysis of control and guiding mechanisms in the open content domain. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63(10):1947–59 DOI  
  5. ^ http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/20/technology/20link.html