New Caledonian Araucaria
edit
| New Caledonian Araucaria | |
|---|---|
| |
| Araucaria columnaris growing on calcareous substrate in south of New Caledonia | |
| Scientific classification | |
| Kingdom: | |
| Phylum: | |
| Class: | |
| Order: | |
| Family: | |
| Genus: | |
The genus Araucaria Jussieu (1789), or "Monkey puzzle", is currently distributed in Southern hemisphere. The main diversity is hosted in New Caledonia, where 14 species, all endemic, are described on a total of 20 extant species forming the genus. The name Araucaria comes from the Spanish “Araucano”, meaning from Arauco, a central Chilean province where the Araucani Indians live. Other Araucaria species are distributed in Chile, Argentina, Southern Brazil, Norfolk Island, Australia and New Guinea. This distribution is still thought to be typically Gondwanan, reflecting extinction events in the Northern hemisphere. The view that the island is a museum for plant relicts is opposed to the one implying more recent radiation consecutively to the island emersion. New Caledonia was part of the supercontinent Gondwana, and separated from Australia 80 Ma. However, geological evidences suggest that New Caledonia was submerged during Paleocene (ca. 65 Ma) and Eocene (until ca. 37 Ma) [1]. The actual New Caledonian biota may then result from a total recolonization since the Oligocene [2].
New Caledonia, considered as the smallest of the most significant biodiversity hotspot in the world [3], host a unique flora which 75.1% is endemic [4]. The different species of Araucaria trees can be found in every habitat that New Caledonia present. However, almost all of them are growing on ultramafic substrate, characterized by a low fertility (low N,P,K levels) and heavy metal richness (Nickel, Cobalt).
Phylogenic history: the rejection of a Gondwanan origin hypothesis
editThe first Araucaria species were mentionned by Guillaumin in 1948: A. balansae, A. cookie, A. montana, A. muelleri and A. rulei [5]. In 1949, J. T. Bucholz added three new species: A. bernieri, A. biramuluta and A. humboldtensis. In 1972, D. J. de Laubenfels described five other species: A. luxurians, separated from A. cookie renamed A. columnaris, A. laubenfelsii, A. nemorosa, A. scopulorum and A. schmidii [6], and divided these thirteen species in two groups [7]. The first includes species following the Massart model (plagiotropic branches, partial reiterations) while the second includes species following the Rauh model (orthotropic branches and no reiterations) with bigger leaves [8] (Kranitz, 2005). Veillon described in depth architecture of New Caledonian Araucaria, conform to these models and noticed that species following Rauh model have bigger leaves. He also designed a key to help in field identification, based on characters definitely fixed in adults, so ecological factors impacting trees morphology cannot interfere in the identification process [7].
In 1952, Wilde and Eames [9] defined four sections for the Araucaria genus: Araucaria, Bunya, Intermedia and Eutacta, using a key based on morphology (leaves, attachment of pollen cones and ovulates cones, cone scales, vascular system cone-scales complex, type of germination and seedling morphology).
New Caledonian Araucaria species belong to the Eutacta section, also including A. heterophylla from Norfolk Island, and A. cunninghamii hosted by both Australia and New Guinea.
In 1998, first genetic analyses based on RBCL gene sequence validated the recognition of the four sections within Araucaria genus [10]. Among Eutacta section, New Caledonian species formed a monophyletic group where A. cunninghamii (Papua New Guinea) was derived first, then A. heterophylla (Norfolk island). The New Caledonian species revealed a strong homology for rcbL sequences (from 99.5 to 100%), where 10 out of 13 species are identical for this gene sequence. This strong homology and A. heterophylla as a sister group of New Caledonian species (the Norfolk Island being relatively young, less than 3 million years old) are first elements suggesting a recent differentiation of Araucaria trees in New Caledonia. This hypothesis comes in opposition of an older Gondwanan origin.
Gaudeul et al. (2012) attempted to better describe the evolutionary relationships and diversification of New Caledonian species by using AFLP markers and by performing Bayesian, genetic distances and cladistics analyses [11]. Ecological, morphological and geographical parameters were also considered in the study, which ended supporting a recent diversification of the genus in New Caledonia. Moreover, another genetic group was created: coastal species. However, no evidence were shown for more environment implication in driving speciation, which may be the result of both adaptation and allopatry. The concept of cryptic species, rare among such an iconic group, is mentioned, regarding several divergent populations.
In the meantime, Escapa and Catalano (2013) published a phylogenetic analysis using parsimony [12]. For the first time in the Araucariaceae family, genetic (19 plastid, 2 nuclear and 2 mitochondrial genomic regions) and morphologic data (52 discrete and 10 continuous characters) were combined, confirming a strong monophyly for the 4 sections existing. However, relationships among New Caledonian species remain difficult to elucidate even if their relatively recent origin is confirmed by phylogeny based on combination of plastid and nuclear data, and the use of molecular clock [13]. While this study seems to corroborate with overwater dispersal consecutively to the submersion of New Caledonia, the origin of New Caledonian Araucaria species seems too old to originate from one single dispersal from Australia to Norfolk Island, and then to New Caledonia.
The complexity of species identification and delimitation in New Caledonian Araucaria is illustrated by Rusham et al. (2016) [14], underlying a cryptic diversity present between two relative species (A. rulei and A. muelleri). This work leads to the identification of a fourteenth endemic species, Araucaria goroensis [15], confirming the difficulty to distinguish species among the Monkey Puzzle genus in the territory. This new species was initially confused with A. muelleri, but it appears to be more closely related to A. rulei. Distinctions with the latter hold in larger leaves, microsporophylls without a shouldered base and shorter female cone bracts.
The origin of such a diversity among the Araucaria genus in New Caledonia still remain unclear, but appears to be relatively recent. Also speciation may be still be processed as suggested by the cryptic diversity observed among the genus [11].
| Group | Species | IUCN status | Leaf length (mm) | Leaf width (mm) | Architectural model | Substrate | Habitat | Altitude (m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coastal | A. columnaris | LC | 5-7 | 4-5 | Massart | Calcareous | Calcareous platforms | < 50 |
| A. nemorosa | CR | 6-10 | 1.5-3 | Massart | Ultramafic | Maquis | < 100 | |
| A. luxurians | EN | 5-7 | 4-5 | Massart | Ultramafic | Humid evergreen forest | < 300 | |
| Small-leaved | A. bernieri | VU | 2-3.5 | 1.5-2.5 | Massart | Ultramafic | Humid evergreen forest, deep valleys | 100 - 800 |
| A. schmidii | VU | 7-10 | 1.5-2 | Massart | Acidic | Montane cloud forest | > 1400 | |
| A. scopulorum | EN | 3-4 | 2.5-3 | Massart | Ultramafic | Maquis | 50 - 800 | |
| A. subulata | NT | 4-6 | 2-2.5 | Massart | Ultramafic | Humid evergreen forest, deep valleys | 100 - 1100 | |
| Large-leaved | A. biramulata | VU | 7-9 | 5-6 | Massart | Ultramafic | Humid evergreen forest, deep valleys | 300 - 1000 |
| A. goroensis | EN | 26-33 | 1-16 | Rauh | Ultramafic | Maquis | 150 - 550 | |
| A. humboldtensis | EN | 5-6 | 4-5 | Massart | Ultramafic | Maquis of high altitude | 600 - 1500 | |
| A. laubenfelsii | NT | 12-20 | 8-10 | Massart | Ultramafic | Evergreen forest or maquis | 700 - 1200 | |
| A. montana | VU | 11-14 | 7-8 | Massart | Ultramafic and acidic | Dense humid forest or maquis | 400 - 1200 | |
| A. muelleri | EN | 30-35 | 15-20 | Rauh | Ultramafic | Dense humid forest or maquis | 150 - 1200 | |
| A. rulei | EN | 20-25 | 11-14 | Rauh | Ultramafic | Dense humid forest or maquis | 400 - 800 |
 | This is a user sandbox of Nicolas Anger. You can use it for testing or practicing edits. This is not the sandbox where you should draft your assigned article for a dashboard.wikiedu.org course. To find the right sandbox for your assignment, visit your Dashboard course page and follow the Sandbox Draft link for your assigned article in the My Articles section. |
- ^ Pelletier B. 2006. Geology of the New Caledonia region and its implications for the study of the New Caledonian biodiversity. In C. E. Payri and B. Richer de Forges [eds.], Compendium of marine species of New Caledonia. Documents Scientifiques et Techniques, vol. II 7, 2nd ed. IRD, Nouméa, New Caledonia.
- ^ Grandcolas P., Murienne J., Robillard T., Dessuter-Grancolas L., Jourdan H., Guilbert E. and Deharveng L. 2008. New Caledonia: A very old Darwinian island? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, Biological Sciences 363: 3309-3317.
- ^ Brummitt N., Lughadha EN. 2003. Biodiversity: where's hot and where's not. Conservation Biology 17: 1442-1448.
- ^ FLORICAL vers. 22.IV.2016. Morat P., Jaffré T., Tronchet F., Munzinger J., Pillon Y., Veillon J.-M. and Chalopin M. 2012. Le référentiel taxonomique FLORICAL et les caractéristiques de la flore vasculaire indigène de la Nouvelle-Calédonie. Adansonia sér. 3 34(2): 177-219. Munzinger J., Morat P., Jaffré T., Gâteblé G., Pillon Y., Tronchet F., Veillon J.-M., and M. Chalopin. 2016. FLORICAL: Checklist of the vascular indigenous flora of New Caledonia. vers. 22.IV.2016. http://www.botanique.nc/herbier/florical
- ^ Guillaumin A. 1948. Flore analytique et synoptique de la Nouvelle Calédonie et dépendances. Office de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris.
- ^ De Laubenfels DJ. 1972. Gymnospermes. In: Aubréville, A. & Leroy, J-F. (eds) Flore de la Nouvelle-Calédonie et Dépendances, vol.4, pp. 1–167. Paris : Muséum national d’Histoire Naturelle.
- ^ a b Veillon JM. 1980. Architecture des espèces néo-Calédoniennes du genre Araucaria. Candollea 35: 609-640.
- ^ Kranitz ML. 2005. Systematics and evolution of New Caledonian Araucaria. Thesis, University of Edinburgh.
- ^ Wilde MH, AJ Eames. 1952. The ovule and “seed” of Araucaria bidwillii with discussion of the taxonomy of the genus. II. Taxonomy. Ann Bot 16: 27-47.
- ^ Setoguchi H., Osawa T.A., Pintaud J.-C., Jaffré T., and Veillon J-M. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships within Araucariaceae based on rbcL gene sequences. Am. J. Bot. 85: 1507-1516.
- ^ a b Gaudeul M., Rouhan G., Gardner MF., and Hollingsworth PM. 2012. AFLP markers provide insights into the evolutionary relationships and diversification of New Caledonian Araucaria species (Araucariaceae). American Journal of Botany 99: 68-81.
- ^ Escapa IH. and Catalano SA. 2013. Phylogenetic Analysis of Araucariaceae: Integrating Molecules, Morphology, and Fossils. International Journal of Plant Sciences 174: 1153-1170.
- ^ Kranitz ML, Biffin E, Clark A, Hollingsworth ML, Ruhsam M, Gardner MF, et al. 2014. Evolutionary Diversification of New Caledonian Araucaria. PLoS ONE 9(10)
- ^ Ruhsam M., Rai HS., Mathews S., Ross TG., Graham SW., Raubeson LA., Mei W., Thomas P.I., Gardner M.F., Ennos R.A., et al. 2015. Does complete plastid genome sequencing improve species discrimination and phylogenetic resolution in Araucaria? Molecular Ecology Resources 15: 1067-1078.
- ^ Mill RR., Ruhsam M., Thomas PI., Gardner MF., and Hollingsworth PM. 2017. Araucaria goroensis (Araucariaceae), a new Monkey Puzzle from New Caledonia, and nomenclatural notes on Araucaria muelleri. Edinburgh Journal of Botany 1–17.