This is the sandbox page where you will draft your initial Wikipedia contribution.
If you're starting a new article, you can develop it here until it's ready to go live. If you're working on improvements to an existing article, copy only one section at a time of the article to this sandbox to work on, and be sure to use an edit summary linking to the article you copied from. Do not copy over the entire article. You can find additional instructions here. Remember to save your work regularly using the "Publish page" button. (It just means 'save'; it will still be in the sandbox.) You can add bold formatting to your additions to differentiate them from existing content. |
Article Draft
editLead
editGnotobiosis (from Greek roots gnostos "known" and bios "life") refers to an engineered state of an organism in which all the forms of life (i.e., microorganisms) in or on it, including its microbiota, are known.[1] The term gnotobiotic organism, or gnotobiote, can refer to a model organism that is colonized with a specific community of known microorganisms (isobiotic or defined flora animal) or that contains no microorganisms (germ-free) often for experimental purposes.[2][3][4][5] Additionally, specific-pathogen-free (SPF) organisms are another type of gnotobiosis in which it is known that a certain pathogen is absent from the community of microorganisms in or on the host.[6] The study of gnotobiosis and the generation of various types of gnotobiotic model organisms as tools for studying interactions between host organisms and microbes is referred to as gnotobiology.[2]
Article body
editHistory
editThe concept and field of gnotobiology was born of a debate between Louis Pasteur and Marceli Nencki in the late 19th century, in which Pasteur argued that animal life needed bacteria to succeed while Nencki argued that animals would be healthier without bacteria,[2] but it wasn't until 1960 that the Association for Gnotobiotics was formed.[4] Early attempts in gnotobiology were limited by inadequate equipment and nutritional knowledge, however, advancements in nutritional sciences, animal anatomy and physiology, and immunology have allowed for the improvement of gnotobiotic organisms.[7]
Methods and technological advancements
editGuinea pigs were the first germ-free animal model described in 1896 by George Nuttall and Hans Thierfelder, establishing techniques still used today in gnotobiology.[8] Early methods for maintaining sterile environments involved sterile glass jars and gloveboxes, which developed into a conversation surrounding uniformity of the methods in the field at the 1939 symposium on Micrurgical and Germ-free Methods at the University of Notre Dame.[4] Major early (1930-1950s) accomplishments in the field of gnotobiotics came from the Univeristy of Notre Dame, the University of Lund, and Nagoya University.[8][9] The Laboratories of Bacteriology at the University of Notre Dame (known as LOBUND) was founded by John J. Cavanaugh and is cited for making some of the most notable achievements in the field of gnotobiotic research.[10][11] Under the direction of James A. Reyniers, early work at LOBUND focused on obtaining gnotobiotes from contaminated stocks and using isolators that were bulky and costly high pressure steam sterilized steel containers, however, later work at the institute shifted the focus of the field towards establishing colonies of isolator animals.[4] The first germ-free rat colony was generated and maintained using a steam sterilized isolator in 1946 by Swedish scientist Bengt Gustafsson.[7] Flexible film isolators using peracetic acid vapor began being developed in the 1950s.[4] Refined sterilization techniques and manufacturing changes from LOBUND reduced the size and cost of isolators, making gnotobiotic research more universally accessible.[10][11] Today, despite numerous advances in gnotobiotic research and technologies, the main challenges facing gnotobiotic research is cost, space, efficiency, and operational procedure requirements.[10] In 2015, the costs of maintaining gnotobiotic mice cages was greater than 4 times the cost of rearing non-gnotobiotic mice, creating a challenge for establishing facilities using typical funding source, such as federal grants from institutions like the NIH.[10]
Application of the technology
editThe early focus of the field of gnotobiology was on proving that an organism could live in the absence of microorganisms, which ultimately resulted in the development of gnotobiotic organisms as a tool for research.[5] Between the 1950s and 1970s, germ-free models were used to study the effects of the absence of bacteria on host organism metabolism and physiology, which later evolved into infecting germ-free organisms with specific microorganisms to investigate their functions and other questions relating to the biomedical field.[12] In the early 1970s, gnotobiotes were used to study the role of microorganisms in host nutrition acquisition and immune response; however, this was limited because animals reared in a gnotobiotic colony often have poorly developed immune systems, lower cardiac output, and thin intestinal walls, which make them highly susceptible to infectious pathogens.[13][14] After the early 1970s, research involving gnotobiotics decreased until the mid-1980s.[10] Within the 21st century, gnotobiotic model systems have become an important tool for investigating interactions between host organisms and their commensal microbiota, as they allow for researchers to investigate specific microbes in a highly controlled host system.[6] Historically, mouse models have been used to investigate the impacts of the microbiota composition (which microorganisms are present) on host immune system, nervous system, metabolism, and physiology; however, an increasing interest in this field has lead to the incorporation of other model organisms to address a larger variety of questions relating to these topics.[3]
Gnotobiotic animals
editA gnotobiotic animal (gnotobiote) is an animal in which all microorganism interacting with it are known and controlled.[15] Gnotobiotic animals are typically born under aseptic conditions, which may include removal from the mother by Caesarean section followed by immediate transfer of the newborn to an isolator where all incoming air, food and water is sterilized.[16] These gnotobiotes are typically raised in a sterile laboratory environment, and are only intentionally exposed to microorganisms of interest to researchers.[5] Mice and rats are common gnotobiotic animals used in research, but other examples of important gnotobiotes include Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans), Drosophila melanogaster (D. melanogaster), zebrafish, and piglets.[3] Gnotobiotes are used as a controlled environment in which to study host anatomy and physiology, the specific symbiotic interactions between a host and specific microorganisms, and the impacts of chemicals on the host and its microbiota.[12]
Examples of gnotobiotic animals
editMammals
editRodents (primarily mice and rats) are most the most common mammalian model systems used for studying gnotobiosis and are widely used to study human health relating to the gut and interactions between microorganisms and their host; however, recently there has been a rise in using gnotobiotic mice to study interactions between different microorganisms (microbe-microbe interactions) in the gut.[17][5] Humanized gnotobiotic mice, or gnotobiotic mice introduced to human intestinal microorganisms by fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) with human feces, are used in the context of studying gut microbiota and their relationship with cancer, the immune system, and nutrition.[18] Some advantages of gnotobiotic mice and rat systems include the uniformity of the organism, historical prevalence, and established system-specific methods, as well as the ability to obtain reliable gnotobiotic mice and rats commercially.[5]
Pigs
Fish
editHistorically gnotobiotic fish have been used as an important model organism for human health[3][8]; however, an increased interest in aquaculture for sustainable food production has lead to increasing prevalence of gnotobiotic studies focused on maximizing production and maintaining healthy captive populations.[19] The majority of research is still only conducted on a few species of fish, such as the zebra fish.[20][19] Some of the advantages of gnotobiotic fish systems include high numbers of offspring per reproduction event coupled with fast generation times and eggs that can be sanitized.[20][19]
Invertebrates
editflies
nematodes
Gnotobiotic Plants
editGnotobiotic plants are plants that either are grown without microorganisms present (aseptic, axenic, or sterile) or grown in the presence of one (monoxenic) or more than one (polyxenic) microorganism.[21] To obtain gnotobiotic plants, researchers sterilize seeds using chemical agents (e.g., ethanol, sodium hypochlorite (bleach), hydrogen peroxide) on the surface of the seed.[21] A wide variety of plants have been used to generate gnotobiotic systems such as Arabidopsis thaliana, peanuts, oats, corn, and many others.[21] Similar to animals, gnotobiotic plant systems have been used to study integral components of host physiology (e.g., nitrogen fixation),[5] as well as pathogenic and symbiotic interactions between plants and microorganisms.[21]
References
edit- ^ Basic, Marijana; Bleich, André (2019-06-01). "Gnotobiotics: Past, present and future". Laboratory Animals. 53 (3): 232–243. doi:10.1177/0023677219836715. ISSN 0023-6772.
- ^ a b c Basic, Marijana; Bleich, André (2018), "Gnotobiology", The Gut Microbiome in Health and Disease, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 341–356, retrieved 2021-11-02
- ^ a b c d Alper, Joe (2018). Animal models for microbiome research : advancing basic and translational science: proceedings of a workshop. Lida Anestidou, Jenna Ogilvie, Engineering, and Medicine. Division on Earth and Life Studies National Academies of Sciences, Institute for Laboratory Animal Research. Roundtable on Science and Welfare in Laboratory Animal Use, D.C.) Animal Models for Microbiome Research: Advancing Basic and Translational Science (2016 : Washington. Washington, DC. ISBN 978-0-309-46389-8. OCLC 1034579585.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ^ a b c d e Trexler, Philip C.; Orcutt, Roger P. (1999). "Chapter 16: Development of Gnotobiotics and Contamination Control in Laboratory Animal Science". 50 years of Laboratory Animal Science. Memphis, TN: American Association for Laboratory Animal Science. pp. 121–128. OCLC 42912592.
- ^ a b c d e f "The gnotobiotic animal as a tool in the study of host microbial relationships". journals.asm.org. doi:10.1128/br.35.4.390-429.1971. Retrieved 2021-11-17.
- ^ a b Tlaskalova-Hogenova, Helena; Kverka, Miloslav; Verdu, Elena F.; Wells, Jerry M. (2015), "Gnotobiology and the Study of Complex Interactions between the Intestinal Microbiota, Probiotics, and the Host", Mucosal Immunology, Elsevier, pp. 109–133, retrieved 2021-11-02
- ^ a b Qv, Lingling; Yang, Zhenggang; Yao, Mingfei; Mao, Sunbing; Li, Yongjun; Zhang, Jia; Li, Lanjuan (2020). "Methods for Establishment and Maintenance of Germ-Free Rat Models". Frontiers in Microbiology. 11: 1148. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.01148. ISSN 1664-302X.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link) - ^ a b c Gnotobiotics. Schoeb, Trenton R.,, Eaton, Kathryn A. London. 11 August 2017. ISBN 978-0-12-804583-1. OCLC 1015915010.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) CS1 maint: others (link) - ^ Vowles, Chriss J. (5 January 2016). Gnotobiotic mouse technology : an illustrated guide. Anderson, Natalie E.,, Eaton, Kathryn A. Boca Raton. ISBN 978-1-4987-3633-6. OCLC 924714283.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ^ a b c d e Gnotobiotics. Schoeb, Trenton R.,, Eaton, Kathryn A. London. 11 August 2017. ISBN 978-0-12-804583-1. OCLC 1015915010.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) CS1 maint: others (link) - ^ a b Vowles, Chriss J. (5 January 2016). Gnotobiotic mouse technology : an illustrated guide. Anderson, Natalie E.,, Eaton, Kathryn A. Boca Raton. ISBN 978-1-4987-3633-6. OCLC 924714283.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ^ a b Wostmann, Bernard S. (1996). Germfree and gnotobiotic animal models : background and applications. Boca Raton: CRC Press. ISBN 0-8493-4008-X. OCLC 34120981.
- ^ Foster, John W.; Slonczewski, Joan L. (2009). Microbiology, An Evolving Science. W. W. Norton. p. 871. ISBN 978-0-393-93447-2.
- ^ "Gnotobiotic animals in research: their uses and limitations". Laboratory Animals. 9 (4): 275–282. 1975-10-01. doi:10.1258/002367775780957296. ISSN 0023-6772.
- ^ Williams, SCP (2014). "Gnotobiotics". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 111 (5): 1661. Bibcode:2014PNAS..111.1661W. doi:10.1073/pnas.1324049111. PMC 3918800. PMID 24497491.
- ^ Foster, John W.; Slonczewski, Joan L. (2009). Microbiology, An Evolving Science. W. W. Norton. p. 871. ISBN 978-0-393-93447-2.
- ^ Martín, Rebeca; Bermúdez-Humarán, Luis G.; Langella, Philippe (2016). "Gnotobiotic Rodents: An In Vivo Model for the Study of Microbe–Microbe Interactions". Frontiers in Microbiology. 7: 409. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.00409. ISSN 1664-302X. PMC 4814450. PMID 27065973.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: PMC format (link) CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link) - ^ Park, John Chulhoon; Im, Sin-Hyeog (2020). "Of men in mice: the development and application of a humanized gnotobiotic mouse model for microbiome therapeutics". Experimental & Molecular Medicine. 52 (9): 1383–1396. doi:10.1038/s12276-020-0473-2. ISSN 2092-6413.
- ^ a b c Zhang, Meiling; Shan, Chengjie; Tan, Fang; Limbu, Samwel Mchele; Chen, Liqiao; Du, Zhen-Yu (February 2020). "Gnotobiotic models: Powerful tools for deeply understanding intestinal microbiota-host interactions in aquaculture". Aquaculture. 517: 734800. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734800. ISSN 0044-8486.
- ^ a b Gnotobiotics. Schoeb, Trenton R.,, Eaton, Kathryn A. London. 11 August 2017. ISBN 978-0-12-804583-1. OCLC 1015915010.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) CS1 maint: others (link) - ^ a b c d Hale, M. G.; Lindsey, D. L.; Hameed, K. M. (1973). "Gnotobiotic Culture of Plants and Related Research". Botanical Review. 39 (3): 261–273. ISSN 0006-8101.